Maybe that's true, if those in the dustbin of history don't count. But if they do, there is no example of a Communist country that spent less of its GDP on arms than the U.S. 'Course some of them were pretty good at cooking the books to disguise that fact, but . . .
Obviously Jensen does not know history and is a revisionist; this adage is one of the biggest lies told by the left. As for the fascist charge, the word Nazi in itself is a slang term for "National Socialism". Today animals like Jensen want to "nationalize" the economy and "socialize" the culture without the "nationalism" of feeling proud of your western and modernized country. In fact, Jensen and his new Reichists want people to feel proud of being in the "international" socialist community. So I would put forth the notion that they are INAZI's; slang for "international socialists".
Yes but a major cost of our military is payroll for a very professional military. If we adopted the communistic/third world way, of relying on very low paid, highly-expendable draftees. Then our costs would be much less.
But I think that the real test of how militaristic a society is not the GDP, but the percentage of population in the military(or having been in). For example Israel and Switzerland have a much higher percentage of their population in the military. And the authority the military has over other aspects of society. For example can Army Generals veto election results??? In many nations they can.