Now why would our F.B.I. cover up the terrorist attack at LAX on July 4th, 2002?

7/6/2002 | TLBSHOW

[TLBSHOW]

Now why would our F.B.I. cover up the terrorist attack at LAX?

I mean they tell us we will be attacked and then we are attacked and then they say this was not a terrorist attack. Now why would our F.B.I. cover up the terrorist attack at LAX?

The PEOPLE WHO WERE ATTACKED knows what it was and IT WAS a TERRORIST ATTACK.

We are either being played for fools or the terrorist just maybe are within the FBI. We know the democrats are terrorist helpers so maybe just maybe the FBI HAS BEEN SUBVERTED TOO!

Just a question for comments.

[Texasforever]

myself believe that any act that is intended to cause terror is a terrorist act. Bureaucrats, however think differently.

I personally view this as a terrorist act. It can be nothing else given the circumstances. However; many have been worried about how the government, post 911, would define a terrorist. That has been one of the greatest fears of those that oppose the Patriot Act. What difference does it make if the Feds are being overcautious in the labeling when we can make up our own minds. Nothing changes the fact that 2 innocent people are dead. They are as dead as any of the 911 victims. The shooting is being treated no differently than it would have been had it carried the label terrorism. I think many on this forum, including myself, would become very uncomfortable if the Feds started labeling every act as a terrorist act no matter what the circumstance.

[dirtboy]

You are retarded and/or quidnunc's friend, landshark.

So in other words, once again, you are reduced to insults. Where did you get the information that the guy would have blown himself up?

[harrowup]

The only other idiot that argued like you is a certified dunce.

Go back to your charge regarding what was said. If you don't find 'bomb' as your first central point then you haven't looked hard enough.

You walked yourself into the brambles....simply because you instinctively translate what other people say...and then you try to justify your arrogance and ignorance by playing tag...I'll ask again...are you just a juvenile acting the punk or are you an adult proving it?

[HoustonCurmudgeon]

Your posts are so sensible I wonder what happened to the insanity that caused you to jump out of perfectly good airplanes? ;-)

[TLBSHOW]

I will Let the victims friends and family have the last word. You terrorist cover upper.

,.,.,.
Friends of Jewish shooting victim call airport killings an act of terrorism

Sat Jul 6, 7:35 PM ET

By KATE BERRY, Associated Press Writer

LOS ANGELES - Friends of the Jewish man gunned down by an Egyptian immigrant at Los Angeles airport called the killing an act of terrorism Saturday, and some are angry that American officials won't do the same.


"He died because he was Jewish," said Eli Gabay, who remembered Yaakov Aminov as a charitable and deeply religious man. "This is a message to all Jews."

The 46-year-old father of eight belonged to a close-knit community of Orthodox Jews in an area of North Hollywood known as Valley Village.

At a service Saturday in the neighborhood, Albert Abergel said he was angry that officials did not immediately call the shooting a terrorist act.

He retold the story making the rounds of the congregation of how Aminov had driven a friend to the airport July 4. Of the small group standing in line at the El Al Airline ticket counter, only Aminov wore a yarmulke, Aberlel said.

"The gunman picked him because he had a yarmulke on his head," Abergel said.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/ne ws?tmpl=story&u=/ap/200207 06/ap_wo_en_po/us_airport_shoo ting_victim_1

Authorities have not ruled out terrorism as a motive, but are also considering the possibility that Hadayet was despondent over personal or business affairs.

Israeli officials said they would consider the attack an act of terror unless it was proven otherwise.

[TLBSHOW]

"They did not call him a terrorist, but he went into the airport with guns — that's terrorism," said Abergel. "It's going to take time, but the government will have to come up with a definition of terrorism."
http://story.news.yahoo.com/ne ws?tmpl=story&u=/ap/200207 06/ap_wo_en_po/us_airport_shoo ting_victim_1

[TLBSHOW]

Thanks for the post tf......

[CIB-173RDABN]

I was 17, that should explain it all.

[terilyn]

How'd you get so smart? :)

[Texasforever]

aah garsh. blush.

[terilyn]

Humble too? Wow!

[Mixer]

You forgot all the phone calls they allowed and/or encouraged from the plane

That is true enough.

[TLBSHOW]

The notion that an individual like Hadayet necessarily needed a direct personal order from the likes of Osama bin Laden to carry out his nefarious deed for it to be characterized as a "terror attack" rather than "isolated incident," "hate crime," or "despondent act" is a dangerously misguided one. It is misguided about the nature of terrorism in general, and about the nature of the enemy America is facing in specific. Haven't bin Laden and other Islamic terrorist leaders publicly called on individual Muslims like Hadayet to commit such acts? And when they do, isn't that terrorism, pure and simple? http://www.jpost.com/servlet/S atellite?pagename=JPost/A/JPAr ticle/Full&cid=10257877107 17

[TLBSHOW]

This was no "isolated incident." The enemies of America vowed to commit a terror strike on American soil on July 4 and they succeeded. America needs to clearly acknowledge this fact, draw the necessary conclusions, and then act on them as swiftly as possible.
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/S atellite?pagename=JPost/A/JPAr ticle/Full&cid=10257877107 17

[The_Media_never_lie]

Now why would our F.B.I. cover up the terrorist attack at LAX on July 4th, 2002?

Now how could they do that, isn't the cat out of the bag?

[TLBSHOW]

we will see if they keep up the charade or not.

[Dave S]

Obviously they did not want to do that unless they were convinced this was part of major coordinated activity. The attack was _not_ that.

Seems like they made the right decision based on the information at hand.

[ladyinred]

Wonder the same thing. What is the reason for the FBI to pretend this isn't a Terrorist attack when clearly it is, and they know it, and we know it!
Don't know if the RATS are behind this or not, most likely they want to avoid an airlines crisis, which might happen if the sheeple know this was terrorism?
Or there could be some national security involved that we are unaware of, or some throwing off the track of the terrorists at large?

[TLBSHOW]

What information on hand? Tell us what they know.

[TLBSHOW]

They did not count on Israel to keep up the fact that it was a terrorist attack. That happen on American soil on July 4th 2002.