Skip to comments.
Faults found in army's new rifle
ic Wales ^
| 3 July 2002
| staff
Posted on 07/05/2002 2:24:39 PM PDT by 45Auto
Soldiers in Afghanistan have reported three faults with the army's new SA80-A2 rifles, the Ministry of Defence say.
Defence Secretary Geoff Hoon has told troops he would investigate claims the weapon misfires badly, the same problem suffered by the gun it replaced.
Armed forces minister Adam Ingram told shadow defence secretary Bernard Jenkin that three formal equipment failure reports had been filed from Afghanistan.
He said: "The SA80-A2 is operating in a very difficult environment in Afghanistan with both dusty conditions and extremes of temperature.
"In an operational environment any concerns are treated very seriously and a specialist team on the ground is investigating these reports as a matter of urgency."
The original SA80 was suspended from the Nato Nominated Weapon List in 1997 after soldiers experienced problems such as jamming in extreme weather.
Following a £92 million modification programme, the revised weapon was declared one of the best in the world by the MOD and was introduced earlier than planned for use by troops in Afghanistan.
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: arms; banglist; britain; mmlitary; rhodesia; sa80
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-150 next last
1
posted on
07/05/2002 2:24:39 PM PDT
by
45Auto
To: 45Auto
2
posted on
07/05/2002 2:25:31 PM PDT
by
45Auto
To: 45Auto
I miss my M-14. Learned to sleep standing up with it as a prop.
3
posted on
07/05/2002 2:27:03 PM PDT
by
stumpy
To: 45Auto
Caliber = 5.56 NATO (.223rem)
Action = Gas operated, rotating bolt
Overall length = 770mm
Barrel length = 518mm
Weight = 4.13kg (w. optical sight 4X SUSAT scope)The Volunteer only with iron sights
Magazine capacity = 30 rds
4
posted on
07/05/2002 2:28:27 PM PDT
by
45Auto
To: stumpy
There are a few weapons in my collection I may, just may part with for the right price.
My M1A1 is not among them.
L
5
posted on
07/05/2002 2:29:36 PM PDT
by
Lurker
To: 45Auto
You'd think in this day and age that they'd field test a rifle before issuing it.
6
posted on
07/05/2002 2:32:32 PM PDT
by
Eagle Eye
To: 45Auto
Probably the chamber is too tight, the same fault as M16s - results in an accurate "peacetime" rifle but one that jams as deposits build up in the chamber. The AK-47 solution is the simplest - the Russians fired the weapon until it jammed under field conditions, figured out why it jammed, and changed the shape of parts, especially the chamber, until it wouldn't jam. This resulted in the infamous AK-47 lack of accuracy and extreme reliablity.
7
posted on
07/05/2002 2:33:25 PM PDT
by
Iris7
To: 45Auto
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: 45Auto
I carry my ar on the snowmachine all winter long. In many GMU's people so many wolves, you can shoot them on the fly; but much harder than you'd think. I have never experienced problems with my pre-ban A2's under pretty tough conditions. Most people carry mini-14's due to price. My folding stock will jam right up after a few clips if not cleaned.
For all the talk about reliability; I luv my ar's
10
posted on
07/05/2002 2:38:27 PM PDT
by
Eska
To: Hobey Baker
I thought our troops were still using the M-16!?!?! Sadly, they are.
These are British troops.
11
posted on
07/05/2002 2:39:55 PM PDT
by
Drew68
To: 45Auto
It *is* a sweet-looking rifle.
12
posted on
07/05/2002 2:41:01 PM PDT
by
Drew68
To: stumpy
I miss my M-14. Learned to sleep standing up with it as a prop. I was just going to mention the M-14. Why on earth they left that fine rifle, I'll never understand.
13
posted on
07/05/2002 2:41:14 PM PDT
by
meyer
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: Willie Green
Nice Pic, Mr. Green. A fine work of art.
15
posted on
07/05/2002 2:42:27 PM PDT
by
meyer
To: Willie Green
Love your mini-14 (or is it mini-30?)... it's purtier than mine, but I love my Garand!
16
posted on
07/05/2002 2:45:27 PM PDT
by
dcwusmc
To: Lurker
The Garand was a beautifully engineered precision instrument but the Lee Enfield No. 4 Mark 1 * was better able to handle mud, dust and rough handling by young men on the move.
17
posted on
07/05/2002 2:46:03 PM PDT
by
Clive
To: stumpy
I miss my M-14... Me too! I'd choose it, or an FAL any day.
18
posted on
07/05/2002 2:48:10 PM PDT
by
GingisK
To: Willie Green
See reply 17.
19
posted on
07/05/2002 2:48:36 PM PDT
by
Clive
To: dcwusmc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-150 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson