Posted on 07/02/2002 2:11:59 AM PDT by bradactor
July 02, 2002
Congress unites in fear of world 'government' From James Bone in New York
AMERICA’S conservatives see the creation of the first global criminal court as another step towards a sinister “world government” that threatens US sovereignty. They denounce the new tribunal as a “kangaroo court” set up by a deeply suspect United Nations. “The White House is bowing to conservatives who have a kneejerk reaction to any international body that has even the most remote authority to tell the United States what to do,” The New York Times commented.
But the opposition in this case extends across the political spectrum. Congress has taken the extraordinary step of passing legislation that would authorise military action to free any American taken into custody. “Even Hillary Clinton voted for it,” one congressional aide said. “The idea that it’s some right-wing paranoid fear about the International Criminal Court (ICC) is not true.
“In the US political context, the supporters of the ICC are a small minority — one fifth of the Senate. The other four fifths were ready to pile in. The court is seen as an assault on the United States and US sovereignty.”
As the world’s sole remaining superpower, the United States has the same suspicion as 19th-century Britain did of “foreign entanglements”. This longstanding isolationist tendency prevented the United States from joining the League of Nations and has left it deeply sceptical about the UN, which many conservatives see as an ungodly organisation once dominated by communists and now largely controlled by unreliable Europeans.
US negotiators tried and failed to give the UN Security Council control over which cases come before the court, which would have allowed Washington to use its UN veto to block the prosecution of Americans.
As a result, the US was not among the 120 states that endorsed the creation of the court at a 1998 conference in Rome. But President Clinton did eventually sign on as his last act in office so that the United States could remain engaged in negotiations.
Once it became clear that the court would come into existence without the changes sought by Washington, the Bush Administration told the UN it was “unsigning” the Rome Treaty.
William Pace, head of the non-governmental Coalition for the International Criminal Court, said: “What has happened is an international organisation is being established that the United States cannot control through the Security Council. This is the real ideological offence that is being taken. Even though it’s not going to be able to tell the US Government what to do, the fact that US citizens can be subject to international jurisdiction is unacceptable to the United States.”
Because the new tribunal has jurisdiction over crimes that take place on the territory of a state party, American nationals might be brought to justice even though the United States rejects the court.
While the Pentagon worries that American soldiers might be prosecuted for purely political motives — that was the reason given for the vetoing the UN mission in Bosnia — there is an equally compelling fear driving US policy.
In the wake of Britain’s arrest of Augusto Pinochet, the former Chilean dictator, the attempted legal action in Belgium against Ariel Sharon, the Israeli Prime Minister, and the renewed controversy over Henry Kissinger’s role in the Vietnam War, Washington is also concerned that former ministers might be the targets of prosecution. Donald Rumsfeld, the Defence Secretary, for instance, might be arrested while travelling abroad on spurious charges stemming from the War on Terror.
“Americans, by virtue of America’s international reach, certainly would become in due course the foremost targets,” the Dallas Morning News said.
The Red Queen doesn't seem to understand why we don't want to be judged by people who see nothing contradictory about that statement.
Off with their heads.
The rest of the world is jealous as can be of the US. They sap us dry at every opportunity. Frankly, we'd save tens of billions each year by telling those thankless a.h.s where to stick their requests for more money.
When Europe would have to start footing the lion's share of the UN fees, it would fall flat on it's ass. Then end.
If we do not do this then the world government will happen in our lifetime.
“Even Hillary Clinton voted for it, …”
Will the wonders never cease!
Of course, there could be a more personal reason. Our war against Yugoslavia was illegal under international law – and Bill and others would be liable for arrest and imprisonment by the new court.
That's good news - We can all discard our tin foil hats now.
Nuff said.
There was a civil war and Croats were killing Serbs and Muslism as well. Every nation fought some war at some time and war involves killing. Does it mean that every nation deserves to be ruined and enslaved?
The "liberal" slant of this article deserves its own thread.
Oh, how I WISH this was true!
Aren't China and Russia, two other countries powerful enough to tell everyone else to go F off, also ignoring the ICC?
Of course we defend national sovernty! Who wants other nations dictating our lives? Idiots.
What if the world court decided the press was too free? How about regulating the press from China?
“Even Hillary Clinton voted for it,”
Wasn't her idea, I'm sure. She saw the polls and Bill would be in international prison for attempting to rule the world. DUH!
which many conservatives see as an ungodly organisation once dominated by communists and now largely controlled by unreliable Europeans.
Uh....yeh! Looks who's on the human rights comissions. God, I have trouble reading articles written by stupid people!
President Clinton did eventually sign on as his last act in office so that the United States could remain engaged in negotiations.
He also sold our military technology to Communist Red China to win an election. Doesn't give him much credibility in the U.S. now does it? How much power did the UN offer the anti-Christ for signing the world court agreement?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.