Skip to comments.
AB 1058 Anti-SUV bill clone passes in CA
Hegh Hewitt
| 2002/07/01
| Hugh Hewitt
Posted on 07/01/2002 6:51:05 PM PDT by ZGuy
John Campbell (R) just announced on the Hugh Hewitt show that the democrats in Sacramento have pulled a fast one. Bill 1058 which has been written about on several posts originally failed. The democrats took a bill on Friday night which dealt with an unrelated subject and gutted out the language. They then inserted the exact language of 1058 and the senate passed it Friday. This (Monday) afternoon the house got the bill. The democrats had to hold a hearing and every office in the capital was available but they chose to hold the "hearings" in the smallest office in the building - the only one which had no TV cameras, no radio, no cameras, and no space for reporters or the public to attend. They then passed a vote making this bill exempt from the 3-day waiting period required by law for public input. The democrats just passed the bill in the last 45 minutes and it now goes to the governor's desk. No republicans voted for the bill in either chamber. One highlight - (Dennis?) Cardoza - the democrat running for Condit's seat voted for the bill in the central valley. He's toast.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: 1058; autoshop; carbondioxide; landgrab; libertarians; suvs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-331 next last
Someone please make links to the related articles on this bill which raises the costs of SUVs several thousand dollars, raises the cost of gasoline, and will in fact make it impossible to purchase some SUVs outright. This also need some major pinging.
1
posted on
07/01/2002 6:51:05 PM PDT
by
ZGuy
To: ZGuy
Here's a major PING!
2
posted on
07/01/2002 6:56:27 PM PDT
by
RedWing9
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; goldstategop; doug from upland; ElkGroveDan
(((ping))))
To: ZGuy
One idea behind this plan was that all of the ads in California said to call Sacramento to opposed 1058. Now the democrats can claim that they DID oppose 1058. (wink, wink)
The Sierra Club made this a litmus test for dems. They were told that they would be on the Sierra club hit list if they opposed this clone. One democrat house member said that he decided to vote for this bill after SIX calls to the speakers office
4
posted on
07/01/2002 6:57:41 PM PDT
by
ZGuy
To: ZGuy
Unbelievable gall -- arrogant air heads --
To: ZGuy
Sounds ok to me. But, then, SUVs are on my list of "Things that don't need to be."
6
posted on
07/01/2002 6:59:42 PM PDT
by
upchuck
To: ZGuy; COB1; Cagey; SeeRushToldU_So
A proud owner of two SUV's.......... CA Dems can kiss my bumper..........
Rush, Cagey - SUV haters in CA.....coming to a State near you? Cob - when are they coming for your truck?
To: ZGuy
It passed in the house by one vote. Grey Davis make have orchestrated this as a money-making opportunity. Now he has 12 days to say to the car makers and/or the enviros "Give me major money or I will sign/veto this bill."
8
posted on
07/01/2002 7:01:13 PM PDT
by
ZGuy
To: ZGuy
SUV's further make that division line between the "haves" and "have nots"(in a Dem's view). SUV's are totally selfish and evil in the liberal dem's eyes...however, most(of the Democrats) that are in power drive them, or have someone else drive them to their offices in CA to sneak this into the bill.
If in the market, there was a demand for a smaller car, then there would be more....simply stated.
But that would be unfair...I am so sick of hearing unfair I could puke......
To: ZGuy
So what was in the bill? What was the number on the bill? The GOP can beat the Dimwits over the head on tv ads with this one.
10
posted on
07/01/2002 7:02:15 PM PDT
by
kellynla
To: ZGuy
Let the fruits and nuts in Kaliforniastan freeze in the dark.
Vermontistan? Kalifornistan? etc.? What has happened to this Country?
11
posted on
07/01/2002 7:05:16 PM PDT
by
oldtimer
To: RedWing9
Cool! This should make them really popular come November.
To: ZGuy
Well we all know gay Davis will sign it.
To: ZGuy
They'll have to pry the steering wheel out of my cold, dead fingers...
14
posted on
07/01/2002 7:08:32 PM PDT
by
mhking
To: upchuck
"Sounds ok to me. But, then, SUVs are on my list of "Things that don't need to be.""
In a free republic, what else are things that don't need to be here?
If someone can afford a SUV, Caddy, or whatever...what difference does that make to those without them? I have yet to see any logical arguement against an individual's right to own and drive whatever they desire.
If something is legal to own and use, that is all there is needed to justify it.
To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; ZGuy
What ever happened to the great state of California? So much innovation and customizing in the auto industry got it's very life in California. It started out west and found it's way across the rest of the US eventually and now these "idiots in charge" want everyone walking. It is sickening.
16
posted on
07/01/2002 7:13:13 PM PDT
by
Cagey
To: kellynla
Sorry Kelly - I don't remember the number of this bill, though rep. Campbell stated in on the show. See all the threads on AB 1058 to see what this bill was about. All they did was gut one bill with a different number and then did a straight copy and paste of AB 1058. It is identical.
17
posted on
07/01/2002 7:14:01 PM PDT
by
ZGuy
To: upchuck
Don't worry, it's a low water volume model.
18
posted on
07/01/2002 7:14:58 PM PDT
by
Cagey
To: upchuck
Sounds ok to me. But, then, SUVs are on my list of "Things that don't need to be."So what makes you/the California legislature the arbitor of what I need or don't need???
BTW, I'm doing just fine with my wife and three children in our Urban Assault Vehicle. I'm sure you/they don't expect me to cram my large frame (6'4"/285#) and the remainder of my family into an econobox, do you?
19
posted on
07/01/2002 7:18:59 PM PDT
by
mhking
To: mhking
Yes, they do! lol!
20
posted on
07/01/2002 7:24:21 PM PDT
by
kcvl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-331 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson