Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Plane Tows Boycott Banner
The Cincinnati Enquirer ^ | Sunday, June 30,2002 | staff writer

Posted on 06/30/2002 10:03:17 AM PDT by yankeedame

Sunday, June 30, 2002

Plane tows boycott banner

At an event aimed to promote unity among blacks and whites, Cincinnati's continued racial division was evident Saturday at the Greater Cincinnati-Northern Kentucky Billy Graham Mission.

As the Rev. Mr. Graham called on the crowd to join him in prayer, a plane out of Lunken Airport flew over the stadium 10 times pulling a banner that read: “Boycott Cincinnati. www.cincyboycott.org”

“My sense is it did not create any form of distraction,” said Rick Segal, a mission spokesman.

However, Victoria Parks, an African-American woman from College Hill who attended the mission on Saturday, did notice: “I think it is appropriate. I will not be spending any money downtown. Any thinking Christian won't either.”

But she praised the diversity of Saturday night's crowd, and said the mission is what Cincinnati needs. “Nothing is going to change in this city until hearts change,” she said.

The plane's flight along the riverfront began during the Christian pop group DC Talk's performance and lasted about 30 minutes. Some in the crowd pointed at it, but the fly-over did not stir the crowd.

Some groups have called for entertainers and convention planners to boycott Cincinnati until the city deals with its racial problems. The boycott came after three days of race riots in April 2001.

Lunken Airport Manager Dan Dickten said the pilot was not in violation of no-fly zones.

“The airport and City of Cincinnati had nothing to do with the banner being towed,” he said. “We have private tenants and businesses here at the field that pay us rent. They have a right to use the airport for aviation purposes. We had no knowledge this banner was going to be flown, and we have no control over such things as that.”

The municipal airport had received several complaints about the banner.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/30/2002 10:03:17 AM PDT by yankeedame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
If those people boycott cincinnati then maybe it will be a safer place !
2 posted on 06/30/2002 10:08:00 AM PDT by anncoulteriscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Exactly how does one "fix" the ravages of black illegitimacy and criminality in their own communities expediently?
3 posted on 06/30/2002 10:20:54 AM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anncoulteriscool
You know, I can't stand the way they have hijacked the word "boycott". In a real boycott, the people doing the complaining would simply not spend money downtown...that is a real boycott. (But of course, the bulk of the people behind this thing have no jobs, so their ability to do a real boycott is limited.) This fake boycott really consists of urging Big Name Liberal Celebrities to legally void contracts they have already signed in order to put financial pressure on the city and the many businesses in the area.

What this is, is "extortion", or more correctly "protection", at least that is what the Feds called it when Al Capone did it. ("Real nice business you got here, palie...same if anything should happen to it.")

The hypocrites that put the banner in the air are only interested in seeing what kind of protection money they can shake out of the city. They don't care about racial harmony, or they would be down there with the honest hearts moving towards Christ. It's all about the Benjamins. Al Capone was an amateur compared to these guys. I hope we have the balls to go after them the same way the Feds got Al. If he had only had the sense to be black, Al would never have been sent to prison, because then, he could have just had a smarmy lawyer play the race card...Chicago would still belong to him if he was black.

4 posted on 06/30/2002 10:50:14 AM PDT by 50sDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 50sDad
What this is, is "extortion", or more correctly "protection", at least that is what the Feds called it when Al Capone did it. ("Real nice business you got here, palie...same if anything should happen to it.")

No, actually, what this is, is a third party boycott called for by a corporation, an apparant felony violation of the felony provisions of the Sherman Anti-trust Act. Though labour unions are exempted, other corporations are not, though I'll admit not knowing as to whether this group is so constituted in Ohio or any other state, nor if they hold 501c3 status.

But it's not only a felony to commit such an illegal act, but to solicit one as well. Let's see if the Ohio prosecutors and Attorney General know the law, and enforce it.

-archy-/-

5 posted on 06/30/2002 1:06:42 PM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; South40; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; ...
Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

6 posted on 06/30/2002 7:06:56 PM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: archy
There's really no problem for the average citizen visiting downtown Cincinnati. If you happen to venture north of LIberty Ave then you are in a no-man's-land, but that's painfully obvious, so who would do it anyway?

The problem is that the convention bureaus in other cities are being swayed by the lies from the Boycott group and the City Council/Mayor are failing to rebut this. A good PR campaign by the Council could likely sweep most of this problem aside.
7 posted on 06/30/2002 7:15:15 PM PDT by Chu Gary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Thanks for the ping.

The "leadership" in Cincy that emerged from last year's riots are so divided they can't even all agree on the boycott.

8 posted on 07/01/2002 2:15:46 PM PDT by mafree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson