One wonders if the anonymous writer of this "review" actually saw the interchange! This article makes it seem like Coulter didn't effectively refute Couric's challenges, which she--in fact--did with poise and ease.
Did the writer even see the interview? I doubt he/she paid close attention.
And Coulter was only the winnner because her book "jumped to No. 1 on Amazon.com the same day"... give me a break! Silly leftists. Any "moderate" who saw the interview and reads this article will undoubtedly conclude there is indeed a liberal conspiracy to repress the truth.
1 posted on
06/27/2002 11:05:46 AM PDT by
Loc123
To: Loc123
Considering the source(CNN), it probably killed them to describe it as a draw. They would have loved to report that Couric won the debate, instead of the truth that Ann mopped the floor with the little nazi soccer clod. But, we should cut CNN some slack, the poor bastards. By the time they turn their ship of fools around to be marginally objective - they'll be in Salon-land.
2 posted on
06/27/2002 11:16:34 AM PDT by
ctonious
To: Loc123
From the opening salvo of that Couric-Coulter interview, Katy was defensive. She was like a cornered bulldog. She'd zing and then try to hit-and-run to the next topic. Ann would zing her back...and continue her response as Katy tried to get the next question stated.
4 posted on
06/27/2002 11:21:00 AM PDT by
TomGuy
To: Loc123
the Case of the Freeper FRiva Feva is under scrutiny - super-sleuths are welcomed
come resolve the way to yesterday's Target Post, you're not out of the running yet
win your registration fees to the FRive Las Vegas Conference if you dare
To: Loc123
The immodest proposal, as Couric reminded viewers, got Coulter fired from the National Review.
Looks as though they didn't see the actual exchange.
10 posted on
06/27/2002 11:25:28 AM PDT by
aruanan
To: Loc123
Another article from the news media driving Ann's point home!
To: Loc123
Ann Coulter is on Dennis Prager NOW and discussing his book.
To: Loc123
I thought Couric ghost-wrote this article, until I read this:
The winner of the bout seemed to be Coulter, whose Crown title jumped to No. 1 on Amazon.com the same day.
(BTW: I saw the 10+ minute interview and I agree that Coulter won.)
To: Loc123
.... got Coulter fired from the National Review. Coulter contended that the conservative periodical let her contract run out. Wrong! Coulter said that she worked for Human Events and that National Review simply dropped her syndicated column. You can't be fired by someone you don't work for.
To: Loc123
25 posted on
06/27/2002 12:23:56 PM PDT by
1Old Pro
To: Loc123
WOW a cat-fight!
30 posted on
06/27/2002 12:44:41 PM PDT by
Lent
To: Loc123
Considering the source this isn't too bad. Ann was excellent.
To: Loc123
Even though Couric vowed that she "didn't want to go tit for tat," she did anyhow. I think watching Couric and Coulter go "tit for tat" would be worth at least a viewing, or two. ;-)
39 posted on
06/27/2002 1:25:34 PM PDT by
Jay W
To: Loc123
Ann went on to talk about her book and ended up defending the Christian Right. And quite well I think!
44 posted on
06/27/2002 1:44:32 PM PDT by
WKB
To: Loc123
Poor Katie...
Is that a bit of tarnish showing on the Princess' crown??
8-(
(But, I suppose that little $15 million salary will keep her warm at night)
To: Loc123
Couric also didn't let Coulter get away with the Eva Braun remark, either. Poor writing skills could be a reason not to put ones name to the article.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
