Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New site turns in Web pornographers
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Wednesday, June 26, 2002 | By Mandi Steele

Posted on 06/26/2002 12:11:29 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

Internet surfers who are tired of unintentionally coming upon obscene websites or receiving unwanted e-mails from purveyors or pornography now have a "simple" way to fight back.

Morality in Media Inc., a nonprofit organization that works to curb illegal porn traffic, launched a new website called ObscenityCrimes.org where Net users can file a report against possible obscenity-law violators.

"It's illegal to distribute obscene material in any medium, including via the Internet," said Patrick McGrath, director of media relations for MIM.

McGrath insists that the porn sites that distribute hard-core pornography over the Net are breaking federal law and should be prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney's office. Through ObscenityCrimes.org, citizens can fill out a report by typing or pasting in the URL, or Web address, of a porn distributor. MIM will review the report then send it on to one of 93 U.S. Attorney's offices.

MIM's new site, says McGrath, gives people who are wondering what they can do about porn distribution a tool with which to retaliate. The number of obscene messages and e-mails dispensed over the Web numbers in the "billions," he said.

The porn industry is "migrating to the Internet and it's becoming more and more difficult to avoid Internet pornography," said McGrath.

He adds, "The distribution of illegal hard-core pornography has seemed to be the one area of the Web that's shown a consistent profit over the years."

MIM wishes to bring a wider audience to their new site so that those who are profiting from Net pornography and sending out "porn spam" will be turned in by the public and prosecuted by the Justice Department.

"We think that every U.S. Attorney's office ought to be doing obscenity prosecutions," McGrath told WorldNetDaily.

He explains that during the Clinton administration the prosecution of obscene materials by the Justice Department dropped "precipitously." In an article he wrote about the online obscenity problem, McGrath noted that although the Internet porn industry was booming in 1998, for the whole fiscal year, "the U.S. Attorneys could only manage to prosecute eight cases where obscenity was a lead charge."

He says U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft gave a speech earlier this month claiming that the current Justice Department will be committed to prosecuting obscenity laws.

"We're extremely encouraged by this and we hope that certainly this [MIM] site will aid in that process," McGrath said.

According to a national opinion poll conducted for MIM by the Wirthlin Worldwide market research firm, 81 percent of Americans said they supported enforcement of federal laws against Internet porn.

"With growing public concern about Internet pornography and an administration in Washington that supports obscenity law enforcement, the launch of the ObscenityCrimes.org website is timely," Robert Peters, president of MIM said in a statement. "Every citizen concerned about the explosion of obscenity on the Internet should bookmark ObscenityCrimes.org on their Web browsers."

Visitors to MIM's new site can also find a mail-in form to report any possible off-line obscenity violators like adult book or video stores. Links are provided on the site to report child pornography to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, and a petition is available to sign for those who want to express their support for obscenity law enforcement. ObscenityCrimes.org also explains why "there is no First Amendment protection for obscene materials."

"Now," stated Peters, "citizens have a simple way to bring reports of possible violations of Internet obscenity laws to their U.S. Attorneys and to the Justice Department in Washington – ObscenityCrimes.org."


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Wednesday, June 26, 2002

Quote of the Day by RooRoobird14

1 posted on 06/26/2002 12:11:29 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
McGrath insists that the porn sites that distribute hard-core pornography over the Net are breaking federal law and should be prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney's office.

Unless they're reporting CHILD porn sites, they're living in a fantasy world if they think the government is going to waste their time filing lawsuits they'll almost certainly lose when there's a war going on.

2 posted on 06/26/2002 12:18:48 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Hedonism drives the liberal engine of selfish, anti-social acts and personal irresponsibility, which is incompatible with and detrimental to successful self-governance.

3 posted on 06/26/2002 12:20:19 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Im confused as to how a picture of a legal act ('hard-core' sex) can be illegal, I mean, isnt that a large part of the essence of free speech: being able to bear witness to reality.

How about this: We keep abortion legal, but outlaw all information about it, medical, psychological and social on the basis that it is 'obscene'. Have I got the hang of it now?

4 posted on 06/26/2002 12:42:16 AM PDT by mindprism.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

A nation of snitches. We're looking more like the East Germans every day, between this kind of effort and abetting the Israelis' "protective wall" -- excuse me, "fence."
5 posted on 06/26/2002 2:22:39 AM PDT by Greybird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Censorship is itself an obscenity. Free minds and free markets.

6 posted on 06/26/2002 2:28:49 AM PDT by John Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The porn industry is "migrating to the Internet and it's becoming more and more difficult to avoid Internet pornography," said McGrath.

porn is migrating to the internet????For the longest time, the porn industry was the only one making money on the internet.

7 posted on 06/26/2002 2:44:21 AM PDT by justaguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mindprism.com
I mean, isnt that a large part of the essence of free speech: being able to bear witness to reality.

Your alleged "witness to reality" can encompass the most vicious and degrading of acts. Rape, molestation, conspiracy, and murder are realities, too. According to your criteria, they should all be legal.

8 posted on 06/26/2002 6:48:16 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
This might help parents, who have children receiving pornagraphic spam and XXX pop up windows. Kids end up at porn sites, when searching for MP3's, games, and screensavers. There are of course many kids who are stricly looking for porn, also.

Sites say, "Top 100 sites for MP3's" then you scroll down to pics and sites for porn and end up in pop-up hell. I'm just saying if you are a parent who doesn't want your child to view porn, you can report this. These sites say MUST BE 18, and ask you to type your birthday which does nothing to deter kids on the web.

I saw a librarian interviewed on Fox and she said they cannot censor patrons from viewing porn sites. Not even kids. When I worked in the library in the 60's, we had 3 levels of borrower cards, C = Children, Y = Youth, and A = Adult, along with 3 sections of books labeled accordingly. It's so hard to keep up. It's only been 5 years since they finally started labeling Video games for E = everyone, T = Teens, and A = Adult (not sure). Are we going backwards and forward at the same time??

After typing this am I just old here, or is it legal to distribute porn to kids now, and is it
against kids rights" to prevent them from reading adult materials in the library? If so, liberals have so much to be proud of, don't they.
9 posted on 06/26/2002 8:33:00 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2Jedismom; kevinjdeanna; nonliberal; PurVirgo; Tomalak; WillaJohns; GADIST64; NJ Freeper; ...
Any young freepers have comments on this article?
10 posted on 06/26/2002 8:35:02 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I have no problem with pay hardcore sites. However, those who seek to distribute porn far and wide to the general public should be stopped. As long as consenting adults seek it out, that's ok with me. But these sick people try to show it to our kids.
11 posted on 06/26/2002 8:37:11 AM PDT by Rodney King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The porn industry is "migrating to the Internet and it's becoming more and more difficult to avoid Internet pornography,"

Thanks for stating what everone else already knows, McGrath.

12 posted on 06/26/2002 8:41:03 AM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Rape, molestation, conspiracy, and murder are realities, too. According to your criteria, they should all be legal.

Depictions of these acts are legal, which you can easily see by watching almost any movie or reading any novel.

13 posted on 06/26/2002 8:50:21 AM PDT by Lamont Cranston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: madfly
The only time porn ever bothered me was when somehow some gay porn stuff was emailed to me. At an engineering school there aren't many women and well porn is useful LOL.
14 posted on 06/26/2002 8:54:45 AM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Your alleged "witness to reality" can encompass the most vicious and degrading of acts. Rape, molestation, conspiracy, and murder are realities, too. According to your criteria, they should all be legal.

You have just described the 'news'. You have also described the plots of most movies and works of fiction. If the depiction of ILLEGAL ACTS are legal, why should the depiction of 'hard-core sex' (a legal activity) be ILLEGAL? I think you misunderstood my post.

15 posted on 06/26/2002 9:12:55 AM PDT by mindprism.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Good news bump
16 posted on 06/26/2002 10:27:06 AM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greybird
lol

The founding fathers would disagree with you. So would most of the citizens and the states in the 1800's. Today, we are shocked that people can get in trouble by perusing sexually immoral material. Back then, as much as cussing in public could result in jail time or fines.

Learn your history. Getting in trouble for porn is nothing compared to what America has done in the past to protect the country's morals.
17 posted on 06/26/2002 10:29:49 AM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
We should all be snitches before they make us their b1tches!.
18 posted on 06/26/2002 10:31:29 AM PDT by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: madfly
My main problem is with the spam and of course child pornography. If you, as an adult, go
intentionally looking for pornography, I've got no problem with that. But I hate spam.

A banner or a link to another related website is o.k. though.

19 posted on 06/26/2002 1:49:32 PM PDT by NJ Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson