Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Our philosopher-president [MAUREEN DOWD OP/ED]
Charlotte Observer ^ | 6-23-02 | Maureen Dowd

Posted on 06/23/2002 5:06:26 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

On Air Force One on Friday, Ari Fleischer gave reporters a preview of the president's schedule, including a pitch for fitness in Orlando, a Republican fund-raiser in Florida, a T-ball game on the South Lawn, a Presidential 3 Mile Run in Washington, the White House Fitness Expo and another fund-raiser at the Washington Convention Center.

For W., time well spent making soft money and hard bodies.

The press secretary then brought forward John Bridgeland, the director of USA Freedom Corps, who briefed the press on the commencement speech Bush was about to make at Ohio State on the culture of public service.

"He's building on notions of duty and charity, human fulfillment and love of country; ideas anchored in great religious teachings and the thinking of the ancient Greeks and Romans and in the principles of the founding fathers," Bridgeland solemnly explained.

He said the president "derived" his ideas from the teachings of -- now follow along -- de Tocqueville, Adam Smith, "the world's major religions," Aristotle, George Eliot, Emily Dickinson, William Wordsworth, Pope John Paul II, Cicero, Abraham Lincoln and the founding fathers Benjamin Rush, Thomas Jefferson and George Washington.

The reporters were saucer-eyed, realizing they had so misjudged the president intellectually. They were surprised to discover the relative inconsequentiality of Plato, Locke and Hegel for his thinking. (Maybe their influence will be apparent in the homeland security policy.) They had never expected to hear the words "George Eliot" and "George Bush" in the same sentence. Did the latter George know that he differed from the former in a fundamental way?

Who would have guessed that a man responsible for immortal locutions like last week's gem about immigration -- "We need to know who's coming in and why they're not going out" -- was in fact relying upon the Tusculan Disputations and the Nicomachean Ethics?

W. has come a long, long way. His main cultural reference point used to be "Cats." What is going on? When Bush is channeling the belle of Amherst, Mrs. Bush is carrying her literacy program too far.

The reporters were skeptical.

"About Tocqueville," asked The New York Times' David Sanger, "has the president read any sections of that?"

"He has," Bridgeland replied. "And we've actually discussed Nicomachean Ethics together, de Tocqueville. Yesterday he was talking in the Oval Office about how Lincoln had completed or addressed the concern that the founding fathers had when -- Madison in particular -- when he rejected Patrick Henry's request to include a declaration of rights in addition, because of the concern that future generations would not remember that there are duties associated with protecting the country we love so much. He made that very case yesterday in the Oval Office."

Are they kidding?

Maybe Bridgeland misheard. Maybe the president was expounding upon the Nickelodeon Ethics.

After the briefing about how much the president had imbibed from the work of Tocquey Boy, Jorge Eliot and Billy Bob Wordsworth, Bush didn't actually quote any of them in his rather pedestrian speech in the Ohio State football stadium. His intellectual modesty is striking.

The idea of helping your neighbors doesn't need support from a highbrow pantheon of philosophers and poets. It's a staple of Kiwanis Clubs and 4-H centers. JFK did it in a sentence: "Ask not ..."

W. won the presidency by never pretending he was someone he wasn't. His appeal was that he seemed to recognize his limits, scaling down the office to suit his simplicity.

But post-9/11, he wants to do a lot of grand things. And maybe his aides think his grand deeds require conferring upon him a grand aura.

On the recent Moscow trip, Condi Rice told reporters she had given the president "Crime and Punishment" to read. Reporters wondered if he thought it was a spin-off of "Law & Order."

Bush advisers are not satisfied with puffing him up merely as president anymore. Now they want to portray him as philosopher-president.

Knock it off. If we want a pedant, we can get the real deal. Al Gore is polysyllablically waiting in the wings.

Maureen Dowd


Maureen Dowd is a columnist for The New York Times, 229 W. 43rd St., Room 943, New York, NY 10036.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: georgewbush; philosopher; president; w

1 posted on 06/23/2002 5:06:26 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I rather doubt that Maureen Dowd has ever read any of the books in question. It is rather sad that the Left has to personalize political disagreements by attacking their "enemy's" intelligence. They said the same things about Ronald Reagan's intelligence.
2 posted on 06/23/2002 5:23:26 AM PDT by Bismark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Maureen Dowd is a columnist for The New York Times, 229 W. 43rd St., Room 943, New York, NY 10036 an idiot!
3 posted on 06/23/2002 5:59:08 AM PDT by MarkL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
It simply amazes me that anyone would pay for this woman's opinion of any subject...
4 posted on 06/23/2002 7:13:16 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bismark
The democratic typical gameplan is to portray the republican as evil (exibit A would be how black leaders treated Bush is 2000 election). Then if that does not work they portray the republican as stupid. In the democratic book a woman with a PHD who votes republican is far dumber than a woman on welfare whose had many kids via many men and is totally dependent on the government. Thats how these people are...its important to know this about the enemy.
5 posted on 06/23/2002 8:25:44 AM PDT by anncoulteriscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: anncoulteriscool
And where's your Harvard degree Ms. Smarty@$$?

Those who can..do and those who can't... write worthless articles trying to look like they can.

Enough said.

6 posted on 06/23/2002 9:49:44 AM PDT by AquariusStar22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

What? No barf alert?


7 posted on 06/23/2002 10:25:08 AM PDT by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
If we want a pedant, we can get the real deal. Al Gore is polysyllablically waiting in the wings.

In contrast to the sighing, patronizing Al Gore.......or the same.

You can weigh the gravitas of a candidate or any person by the people he surrounds himself with and places in positions of authority.

Clinton's Cabinet at first glance resembled a freak or circus sideshow of midgets, giants, sexual-identity challenged, etc. Excluding one or two genuinely talented appointments, Clinton's Cabinet members were as intellectually vacant as they were visually curious.

Al Gore stood by Clinton, calling him a "great president", at the height of the impeachment process of 1998. Al Gore believed that Clinton, and his party were more important than the welfare of the country.

On the other hand, George W. Bush promoted Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, and Condi Rice just to name four.

Whose judgment would you prefer? Clinton and Gore.........or Bush and Cheney??

8 posted on 06/23/2002 10:26:28 AM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cacique

What? No barf alert?

Optional for Dowd columns, as her name alone is fair warning. However, pix of Catherine Zeta Jones are mandatory.

9 posted on 06/23/2002 10:31:30 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dighton
Anybody who marries a commie is ugly on the inside IMO. Poison can come in colorful and attractive packages, but it's still poison.
10 posted on 06/23/2002 10:37:39 AM PDT by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I guess it is Maureen Dowd's fate to be the bitter old woman sitting in the corner, muttering to herself about what might have been... carping to no one in particular about the dress and demeanor of all those around.

It's too bad Ann Landers died.


11 posted on 06/23/2002 10:45:31 AM PDT by Nick Danger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
Anybody who marries a commie is ugly on the inside IMO.

For all I know or care, she's the nastiest woman alive. What's important is that she drove Dowd over the edge.

OK, and she's not unpleasant to look at.

12 posted on 06/23/2002 10:48:33 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bismark
And about Bush "41." But not about that pseudo-intellectual poseur, @#$%&?!. In fact, the only GOP president whose intelligence they didn't mock was Nixon, and they hated him most of all.
13 posted on 06/23/2002 1:36:35 PM PDT by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bismark
"I rather doubt that Maureen Dowd has ever read any of the books in question."

True, but she has colored most of the pictures and was able to stay inside the lines on at least 26% of the occasions!

14 posted on 06/23/2002 1:52:22 PM PDT by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bismark
I rather doubt that Maureen Dowd has ever read any of the books in question. It is rather sad that the Left has to personalize political disagreements by attacking their "enemy's" intelligence. They said the same things about Ronald Reagan's intelligence.

The best part is that Dowd thought she was writing a column of substance!!!

15 posted on 06/23/2002 2:31:07 PM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Poor Maroon, still hasn't been laid.
No sex turns her brain to mush, well, it would if she had a brain.
16 posted on 06/23/2002 2:38:58 PM PDT by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Maureen Dowd,
You're just so loud,
With all that drivel and scorn.

Give up the lefty Times,
And your weekly columnal crimes,
Next to Bush your rant is linguistic porn.
17 posted on 06/23/2002 2:43:38 PM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
This post of mine, from a thread discussing another one of her columns, applies to this Dowd column, too.

Dowd's own words show her to be a "surfacey" person who doesn't value depth (aka, gravitas).

If Dowd had better sense, she'd be embarrassed by her own words.

18 posted on 06/23/2002 4:13:22 PM PDT by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
If my car breaks down, I want an experienced mechanic to take a look under the hood; not the guy who wrote the Chilton's Manual.

19 posted on 06/23/2002 4:15:55 PM PDT by Bandolier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson