Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Education board considers alternate theories about life
The Indepedent ^ | 6/7/2002

Posted on 06/13/2002 7:48:51 AM PDT by JediGirl


Last modified at 11:50 a.m. on Friday, June 7, 2002
•  On the Net: Nebraska Department of Education, the Concerned Citizens for Objective Science Education, and the Intelligent Design Network

By Scott Bauer


The Associated Press

LINCOLN -- The State Board of Education is being asked to allow for the teaching of numerous theories about how life began in addition to evolution.

One of those theories holds that aliens could have started life on Earth.

The board is considering whether to add state science standards to an accreditation rule schools must follow to operate.

More than a dozen people were scheduled to appear at the board meeting Friday to comment on the standards. Math and reading standards have already been added to the rule.

The science standards were approved in 1999. State law now requires schools to report how they are meeting such standards, so they must be added to Nebraska's accreditation rule.

The standards make it clear that evolution be taught as theory, not objective fact. They also ask that students investigate and use the theory of biological evolution to explain the diversity of life.

At an earlier hearing, several people supported the intelligent design concept.

Intelligent design is a belief that living things are too complex to have occurred through random genetic change and must have been designed by a higher power. The nature of that being is not specified, but backers acknowledge it could have been a biblical God, supernatural or extraterrestrial.

Critics of the concept argue that intelligent design is not science and that it is a disguise for creationism, which credits the origin of species to God and has been barred by courts from public schools.

The teaching of creationism in Nebraska drew heated debate in 1999 when the state board adopted science standards that left out any mention of creationism.

Some members of the state board in 1999 wanted to revise the standards to require schools teach that there are other theories in addition to evolution, including creationism.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: creationism; crevolist; etcreatedhome; etphonehome; evolution; littlegreenmen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: balrog666

21 posted on 06/13/2002 9:14:03 AM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Glad I live far from Nebraska.
22 posted on 06/13/2002 9:18:27 AM PDT by stanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JediGirl
Ecclesastes 12:

The Conclusion of the Matter
9 Not only was the Teacher wise, but also he imparted knowledge to the people. He pondered and searched out and set in order many proverbs. 10 The Teacher searched to find just the right words, and what he wrote was upright and true.
11 The words of the wise are like goads, their collected sayings like firmly embedded nails-given by one Shepherd. 12 Be warned, my son, of anything in addition to them.
Of making many books there is no end, and much study wearies the body.

13 Now all has been heard;
here is the conclusion of the matter:
Fear God and keep his commandments,
for this is the whole duty of man.
14 For God will bring every deed into judgment,
including every hidden thing,
whether it is good or evil.

23 posted on 06/13/2002 9:24:40 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JediGirl
Math and reading standards have already been added to the rule.

Alternate theories now required to be taught in Nebraska include the theory that "reading is so totally lame" and "math is boring and sucks".

24 posted on 06/13/2002 9:27:27 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
"math is boring and sucks".

We don't need to teach what is common knowledge.

25 posted on 06/13/2002 9:28:40 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
In 1897 the Indiana House of Representatives unanimously passed a measure redefining the area of a circle and the value of pi. (House Bill no. 246, introduced by Rep. Taylor I. Record.) The bill died in the state Senate.

Note: This is not the internet hoax about Arkansas. See here, or here. As the latter link makes obvious, when dealing in politics, cherchez l'argent.

26 posted on 06/13/2002 9:57:59 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
Oh goodie! So we can all admit that proving something that exists beyond space-time is not possible, and renounce our atheism and theism respectively. Let's all hold hands and admit that we are now agnostics. A little intellectual honesty is all I ask folks.
27 posted on 06/13/2002 10:41:04 AM PDT by That Subliminal Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
every whackjob god myth is false

That's a non-sequitur jlogajan. As a free thinker, I'm sure you already knew that.
28 posted on 06/13/2002 10:43:39 AM PDT by That Subliminal Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: That Subliminal Kid
Oh goodie! So we can all admit that proving something that exists beyond space-time is not possible, and renounce our atheism and theism respectively.

So this "God" thing exists beyond space-time? Why is something that exists beyond space-time undetectable? Why should I even consider a proposal if no evidence for its validity can be presented?

If I cannot objectively observe this "god", then why should I give it any more credence than invisible intangible purple unicorns creating the universe?
29 posted on 06/13/2002 10:44:26 AM PDT by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JediGirl
The existence of a deity is irrelevant in science

Ding ding ding! We have a winner. Makes you wonder why so many atheists pretend that science supports or in some way leads to atheism.
30 posted on 06/13/2002 10:45:21 AM PDT by That Subliminal Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
You shouldn't. Everything that exists just happened through a long series of amazingly remote chances in exactly the right order. Move along..
31 posted on 06/13/2002 10:46:32 AM PDT by That Subliminal Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
By the way, can you objectively observe an emotional state? Can you think of any other things which you assume exist but cannot objectively observe? Think hard. There'll be a pop-quiz on this tomorrow.
32 posted on 06/13/2002 10:47:29 AM PDT by That Subliminal Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: That Subliminal Kid
Makes you wonder why so many atheists pretend that science supports or in some way leads to atheism.

Nice case of projection! It is the creationists that say that Darwin leads to atheism.

33 posted on 06/13/2002 10:48:59 AM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
Darwin? Ever heard of theistic evolution? By the way, what on earth is a "Creationist"? I see that term blithely tossed about so often (by you) that I'm really unsure what exactly you mean when you use the word. Mind giving me a concrete definition that I can hold you to? Thanks!
34 posted on 06/13/2002 10:52:09 AM PDT by That Subliminal Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: That Subliminal Kid
By the way, can you objectively observe an emotional state?

I can't...It is possible to monitor the chemical state of the human brain and observe changes based on "emotional state", but I personally posess neither the equipment nor the expertise to make such observations.
35 posted on 06/13/2002 10:58:59 AM PDT by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: That Subliminal Kid
Everything that exists just happened through a long series of amazingly remote chances in exactly the right order.

Really? I've not seen the chain of events that led to "everything that exists" at this moment, so I can't draw such a conclusion.
36 posted on 06/13/2002 10:59:55 AM PDT by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: That Subliminal Kid
Let's all hold hands and admit that we are now agnostics

That is exactly what I am! :-)

37 posted on 06/13/2002 11:12:09 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Placemarker from beyond space and time.
38 posted on 06/13/2002 12:02:33 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: JediGirl
How clever, you switched the name of God with Allah. I would have thought you'd pick "The Force".
39 posted on 06/13/2002 12:47:00 PM PDT by avenir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
Thanks for the smile.
40 posted on 06/13/2002 12:51:52 PM PDT by avenir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson