This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
|
Skip to comments.
[Locked-flamewar] MUBARAK CLAIMS: EGYPT WARNED U.S. OF AN AL-QAIDA PLOT WEEK BEFORE 9/11
Drudge Report ^
| 6/3/2002
| Matt Drudge
Posted on 06/03/2002 7:59:52 PM PDT by DrLiberty
Egyptian intelligence warned American officials about a week before Sept. 11 that Osama bin Laden's network was in the advance stages of executing a significant operation against an American target, it will be reported on Tuesday (in the NY TIMES)... MORE... A senior U.S. intelligence official denied the warning was received...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1979; 1981; 2001; 200103; 200105; 200107; 200109; 20010911; 200206; 911; afghanistan; airlinesecurity; airplane; anwarelsadat; anwarsadat; arafat; binladen; cairo; carter; corruption; deception; egypt; embassies; embassyplots; foreshadowing; genoa; intelfailures; italy; jimmycarter; jordan; libya; lies; mubarak; mujahadeen; mujahedeen; omarsuleiman; priorknowledge; sadat; sudan; suleiman; terrorism; usembassyegypt; warnings; yasirarafat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240, 241-244 next last
To: Timesink
"Accusing without evidence doesn't make you a "true citizen," it just makes you a kook."
I guess me and Alex Jones are just kooks then. And infowars.com is all full of lies about it right?
Tell me Timesink, what does the term "New World Order" mean to you? After you explore that road, you come back and tell me, based on your conclusions, that it doesn't exist, and that the Bushes, Kennedys, Daschles, Clintons are not all part of it and then yes, you can call me a kook if you like.
But right now, you're just hoping you're right and its a lot easier to just call me a kook, right?
To: Enlightiator
This is OLD NEWS, the NY Times is dusting it off with a new interview to feed on the blame Bush and his administration frenzy. Heres the same "scoop" from DECEMBER of LAST YEAR: Good find, and exactly right as to their motives. Same old, same old.
To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
Good find, and exactly right as to their motives. Same old, same old. PS: And no shortage of fools to pass it along.
To: Howlin
And let me tell you this: I believe what you're saying about the Bush family is a total crock and borders on slander. Like most of your posts. Go get 'im!
To: DrLiberty
I'm reading your stuff DrLiberty. You hang in there, you're doing fine. You might open a few eyes tonight.
To: Brad's Gramma
Like what? If ya don't use FOIL, all the voices are there! All the time!!!! But if ya use too much foil, the voices start coming in from your fillings. It's a no win scenario.
To: Howlin
"Am I wrong about this: I thought before 9-11 the CIA and the FBI were NOT allowed, by law, to share information." Nice try. All the agents I mentioned were FBI. The CIA never reported to the INS, about the 2 in San Diego, did they? Why?
I guess there was another op going on that was more important than preventing terrorism by Al-Queda. Just like it was more important for the FBI to let the World Trade Center Bombing go forward, and the FBI/ATF to let the Oklahoma City Murrah bldg blow up AND KILL 168 AMERICANS!
BUT ITS NOT OUR RIGHT TO QUESTION OUR GOVERNMENT, IS IT COMRADES?
To: Fred Mertz
THANK YOU, FRIEND. EXCUSE ME, BUT I GET A LITTLE CHOKED UP WHEN I THINK ABOUT ALL THOSE ATF AGENTS WHO MISSED OUT ON THE BIG BLOWUP AT OKC WHILE ALL THE LITTLE CHILDREN BLED!!!
But that's just me.
To: Mitchell
Look at post #100.
jwalsh07 is an Arabic translator.
He might be able to help you.
(I haven't heard back from my nephew yet)
209
posted on
06/03/2002 10:10:52 PM PDT
by
Nogbad
To: DrLiberty
sounds like egypt is trying to pile on
To: nutmeg
bump
211
posted on
06/03/2002 10:11:44 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
To: Digger
Mueller was sworn in as FBI Director 4 September 2001. Not time enough for him to do anything except find his way to around!
To: spetznaz;Howlin
And i know in the next hour or so i will receive several posts 'hotly' demanding 'credence' for my assertions in the form of 'proof.' Not disputing your facts, just your assertion. Why is it that the conspiracy theorists insist on leaping to the conclusion that just because one has business investments/dealings with another that they would automatically be aware of and supportive of everything that the other was doing? That is absurd. Are you (spetz) suggesting that just because the Bush family might have had knowledge of what a member of the bin laden family might have been suspected of plotting would be sufficient reason for recusal from business dealings and investment? Nonsense. These dealings go back before the birth of the black sheep.
To: DrLiberty
Everyone is missing the point, including you. Al Queda's mission is to sew seeds of mistrust within us, to break our spirit and unity, not just the economy.
Statements about patriotism do not mean we should not question what happened, including slippages, disconnects, and vacuums.
WHAT WE SHOULD NOT SUSPECT IS AN ULTERIOR MOTIVE ON THE PART OF THE LEADERSHIP UNTIL WE HAVE SOME SOLID EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THAT POSITION. A solid front does not mean blindness. :>(
To: DrLiberty
I guess some people can connect the dots and some people just see stars. I concur. You are a genius.
To: spetznaz
Enjoyed your post. Hard to speak about the Bush family without their extensive interchanges and business relationships to the Saudis.
So, would the Saudis be responsible for the cancellation of the Crusader. Rhetorical:)
To: A Navy Vet
And what would you have the President of the United States do...incite a religious/race war within our own borders? Of course they would.
217
posted on
06/03/2002 10:19:24 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Fred Mertz
I'm reading your stuff DrLiberty. You hang in there, you're doing fine. You might open a few eyes tonight. Its putting me to sleep
218
posted on
06/03/2002 10:19:38 PM PDT
by
woofie
To: Nogbad
Thanks. There's also an Arabic-English automated-translation web page at
http://english.ajeeb.com (but the translations appear to be poor and hard to understand; it seems well behind babelfish or google in terms of the quality of the translation -- not that I really want to appear to be complaining about the quality of a free service someone makes available).
To: Fred Mertz
I'm arriving an hour late to this thread and have only read this far, Howlin. I notice a concerted effort of the leftist media of late to focus on the 'evidence' of the past year while totally ignoring the previous eight years. Force of habit...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240, 241-244 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson