September 10, 2001. That is why this story does not make sense. How could he have skewed facts if he was there only one day before 911?
September 10, 2001. That is why this story does not make sense. How could he have skewed facts if he was there only one day before 911?
No one is accusing him of being responsible for the investigation "SNAFUs" prior to 9/11. Agent Rowley is pointing out in her memo that there were SNAFUs, and that his testimony before congress about that was inaccurate. She then goes on to name some of the problems encountered in the investigation and suggests some ways they could be remedied.
Since she says in her memo that she had previously sent this information to him through channels, people are arguing about whether he knew these things when he testified before congress or not.
You can read the part of the 13-page memo that was published in TIME on this thread. Coleen Rowley's Memo to FBI Director Robert Mueller. The entire portion that has been made public can be found in reply #10.