Posted on 05/27/2002 10:06:40 AM PDT by Mom_Grandmother
VOANEWS.com (Voice of America)
Two African-American Activists Sue US Corporations for Slavery
Jenny Badner
New York 25 May 2002 20:39 UTC
U.S. federal courts are now considering two separate lawsuits brought by African Americans seeking reparations for slavery during the 1800s. The potentially historic lawsuits follow other successful legal action brought against German corporations who used slave labor during the Nazi era.
Slavery, as an institution, ended in 1865 in the United States after a bloody Civil War. Now, for the first time, more than 100 years later, two class action lawsuits accuse large U.S. corporations of profiting from slavery.
The first case, filed in U.S. Federal Court in New York in March, named three companies, Aetna Insurance, FleetBoston bank and the railroad company CSX. About one month later, another suit in nearby New Jersey named New York Life Insurance, the investment-firm Brown Brothers and Norfolk Southern Corporation.
In the words of the March lawsuit, "the practice of slavery constituted an immoral and inhumane deprivation of Africans' life, liberty, African citizenship rights and cultural heritage."
Two African-American activists brought the suits. They seek historic company documents and a jury trial that would determine the payment of punitive damages to the African-American community, along with the appointment of an independent commission.
Attorney Diane Sammons, who represents the plaintiffs, says, "U.S. corporations benefited from stolen labor, from stolen people and from crimes against humanity. And they are still holding on to the benefits of those particular crimes and they should not be allowed to keep their ill-gotten gains."
Ms. Sammons says a multi-billion dollar settlement against German companies, which used slave labor under the Nazi-era in the 1930s and 1940s, set a legal precedent for the lawsuits.
But critics argue there are differences. They say that although the U.S. corporations or their predecessors named in the suits may have unjustly profited from slavery, the events are so old that the survivors of slavery and their children are no longer alive.
In a statement, New York Life Insurance spokesman, William Werfelman, says his company regrets that its predecessor, Nautilus Insurance, sold insurance policies on the lives of slaves between 1846 and 1847. Nonetheless, he says a company should be judged by its current actions and he expects to win in court.
"The fact that slavery was legal in certain parts of the United States at the time does not make it any less repugnant," he emphasized. "Regarding the lawsuits, any lawsuits about events 150-years ago face huge legal hurdles. And we fully expect to prevail in court."
The lawyers who brought the cases argue that the statute of limitations can be extended, since slavery is considered a crime against humanity in international courts. In addition, the claims are based on the legal concept of corporate liability.
Roger Wareham, who also represents the people who brought the cases, says the lawsuits are the latest in a growing campaign, pressing for reparations for slavery. Behind the efforts lies the argument that although slavery was abolished in the 19th century, about 35 million African American descendants of slaves continue to suffer from it through institutionalized racism.
Mr. Wareham says statistics show that as a group, American blacks lag behind whites in economics, education, health and life expectancy. "In every indicator of life, if you took at those statistics of the black community and the white community, and you place them on a chart next to each other, no one would believe that you are talking about people who are supposed citizens of the same country, [who] had the same opportunities, the same access," Mr. Wareham says. "You would think that you were talking about the comparison between a developing country and a developed country."
The U.S. government has never officially apologized or compensated African-Americans for slavery. Mr. Wareham says attorneys are searching for ways to get around the legal rule [sovereign immunity] that exempts the U.S. government from slave reparations lawsuits.
Meanwhile, new class-action lawsuits against additional companies accused of benefiting from slavery are expected to be filed in courts across the nation in the next month.
JMHO: This little legal fact right here is what is going to defeat them in a court of law, unless there is a hidden law somewhere that says our future decendents can/will be held morally and fiancially responsable for all that we do today, even if the laws have changed then.
That's my point exactly, how can you try, convict and sentence anyone today for what was not a crime then, but is today, especially if we had nothing to do with it? That's like holding my grandchildren guilty for our laws today, sometime in the future, it's insane!
Well simply, they have no legal standing. They can make as many faulty analogies as they want with compensation given to living people who were harmed during WWII, but it will make no legal difference. Those who brought these suits think they are smart for creating this scenario of "continued suffering through institutionalized racism", but it will be laughed out of court. I think they also don't realize that if they are bringing a "class action" suit where the plantif is "all african americans", then no "african american" could be on the jury! Wait till they here that in court. They will dismiss their own cases when they find out that only non-blacks can be on the jury.
Of course, these "activists" aren't really interested in the facts of the matter, they are just trying to shake down a couple of outfits with money.
You wonder whether the normal business activities of these companies hurt or helped the lives of the slaves. Did the death benefit paid when a slave (or a horse) expired help the owner maintain the property and other slaves?
These "activists" are nothing more than black racist thugs and their lawyers who are working on contingency.
If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)
reparations are constitutionally illegal
Two willing pawns in a dialectical board game.
I wonder if anyone has considered rejecting claims for reparations on the grounds that they constitute ex post facto restitution.
On the other hand, John Conyers has been trying for years to pass legislation in Congress that would effectively order reparations. At that point, the ex post facto argument becomes much more germane.
I don't know that this action has any real legal merit. But when a stupid old lady can sue for millions because she spills coffee on her crotch, anything is possible.
This definitely would be "after the fact," rendering it meaningless.
If there were an envelope to arrive in my mailbox that had anything to do with reparations, I will immediately mark it "Return to Sender."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.