Posted on 05/22/2002 3:17:25 AM PDT by Gillmeister
What started as a story about how the Bush team handled unspecific warnings about possible terrorist attacks in the U.S. before 9/11 has now prompted the Bushies not only to defend themselves from charges of irresponsibility — which they are entitled to do — but to go on a Chicken Little warnings binge that another attack is imminent, inevitable and around the corner, but we can't tell you when, where or how.
Look, in the wake of 9/11, I would never rule out any kind of attack. That would be foolhardy. But I'm no more interested in indicting the Bush team for failing to respond to an unspecific warning about a possible terrorist attack before 9/11 than I'm interested in having the vice president and F.B.I. director warn us about the certainty of an unspecified attack sometime in the future.
What are we supposed to do with this information? Never go into another apartment building, because reports suggest an Al Qaeda cell may rent an apartment just to blow up the whole structure? Don't go outside? Don't go near national monuments? Pat the belly of every pregnant woman to check if she's a suicide bomber?
Who wants to live that way? Let's make a deal: We won't criticize the administration for not anticipating 9/11 if it won't terrorize the country by now predicting every possible nightmare scenario, but no specific ones, post-9/11. Not only are these "warnings" just unnerving the public when people were finally starting to calm down, but they are also obscuring something very important: We are winning this war.
No, it's not over. And yes, I too will say for the record that sometime, somewhere, there will be another attack. But in the meantime we've actually accomplished a lot. If Osama bin Laden is alive, a big if, his ability to direct acts of terrorism against U.S. targets has been disrupted. It is doubtful that he would dare even use a telephone.
That is important, because bin Laden and his top deputies were a unique and very smart, creative and daring group of terrorists, who do not come along every day. And whether they are all dead or deep in hiding, there is no indication they are in business right now. Yes, probably less professional cells still exist and can still wreak havoc. But when you decapitate an organization like Al Qaeda, and disrupt its money flow, you've done a lot. And when you oust the Taliban in Afghanistan and take away the one true safe harbor for bin Laden — for training and operations — you've also done a lot.
We have put in place reasonable precautions at airports; we have instituted better coordination between the F.B.I., C.I.A. and I.N.S.; we are tracking foreign students more closely; and we and our allies have detained thousands of suspects. The fact that there has been no other major incident since 9/11 is surely not because the terrorists have abandoned their intentions. It is because we have hampered their capabilities. That is a good thing.
But the very nature of this war against small groups and individuals bent on terrorism is that you can never win it definitively. It will be with us forever. But we can limit the number of attacks — and keep terrorist cells on the run and disrupted enough to reduce their capabilities — if our public officials responsible for this war are not spending all day looking in their rear-view mirrors or mindlessly terrorizing the public with unspecified, cover-your-behind warnings about future terrorism.
This is absolutely not an argument for a free pass for the Bush team. Given the stories about intelligence failures that have come out already, we clearly need a special commission, led by professionals, not politicians, that looks into the decadelong history of our handling of Al Qaeda and explores why we did not have better intelligence, why the dots were not connected and how to improve in the future.
But the other thing we need to do is grow up. If we're going to maintain an open society, all we can do is take all reasonable precautions and then suck it up and learn to live with a higher level of risk. That is our fate, so let's not drive ourselves crazy.
I don't know about you, but my Memorial Day weekend plans are set: golf Saturday, bike trip Sunday, barbecue Monday. If the F.B.I. director wants to interrupt my weekend with a specific warning, I'll be all ears; otherwise, pipe down and chill out. Remember it's supposed to be Al Qaeda that's running scared, not us.
Doesn't he know the whole idea is to get Bush's poll numbers down - one way or another?
The only thing to fear is the Democrats, themselves.
And listen for those calls for the hearings go away with that last article in the LA paper interviewing the fellow that tried to broker the handover of Bin Laden to Clinton's administration. This is what you aren't hearing.
I think the Bushies know that another terrorist attack will hurt them in the polls. The Right will say they haven't done enough, and the Left will say the attacks were caused by the war on terror. Their task therefore is to make sure that if an attack happens that people know enough not to be shocked again, and that its continuous with the first attacks and will keep up until Powell gets out of the way of the war on terror.
You've been warned!!!!
(p.s. love your screen name; I'm prone to it before my first a.m. cup of coffee)
Yeah, Tom, it's all about you. BTW did you invite your friend Prince Abdullah to the cookout?
It's like the press after 9-11. Bush was terrible because he wasn't going after Al-Qaeda fast enough. Then Bush was terrible because he crushed Al-Qaeda too quickly. Remember that?
If we think this is bad, just try to imagine what the FBI, CIA and the President hear about on a daily basis.
Personally, I think they have been smart. Now people are beginning to understand, and be grateful, that we are told things when it's credible. It has served the purpose of reminding people that they MUST be vigilant.
- Don't pass a budget then criticize Bushies for losing the surplus.
- Criticize Bushies for not divining the events of 9-11 then bemoan fear mongering when any type of alert is given.
- Scare old people.
- Scare poor people.
- Scare people of color.
- But most of all do not make any constructive suggestions.
If the Dems win in November this battle for the freedom to live as Americans will be over. The next battle will cost millions of lives.
Oh, how wonderful! Who gives a crap what this clown is doing? He can stay in his room and play with himself for all I care.
What is interesting is what he doesn't say he'll do, and that is the purpose of Memorial Day. Not a mention of any thought of those who sacrificed so that scum like Friedman can go play golf or play with himself or bike ride or cook out.
Truth is, he doesn't care. And he especially doesn't care what Bush does or doesn't do, as long as he can criticize a non-Rat Administration
Evil is as evil writes. Using the words "terrorize the country" as an action of our government is not coincidental. Professional writers choose their words carefully.
Then see how the same group say how tough they were on the Clinton administration. Yet they all out and out lied concerning his testimony under oath about whether he was offered over a million dollars in "donations" in the back of a limo. (He testified that he didn't "remember" whether that had happened or not. The "unbiased" news media reported that he had testified that he hadn't been offered the "donation".)
Not the same thing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.