Skip to comments.
WILD PARTY GIRL REDUX $5 Million Judgment Set Aside in Invasion of Privacy Case
ABA Journal eReport ^
| May 10, 2002
| STEPHANIE FRANCIS CAHILL
Posted on 05/14/2002 9:22:57 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
"Everybody and their brother in her college community were poking fun at her," Sergi told the ABA Journal eReport. "Basically, they were making her life a living hell." Maybe next time she won't get drunk and strip in a bar.
To: Bubba_Leroy
Pictures. We need pictures. It's a rule.
To: Bubba_Leroy
Texas college student Amber Kulhanek maintains she is not a wild party girl. But a $5 million default judgment she won against a video company that filmed her topless was set aside in March. Her parents must be very proud putting forth that kind of money for their daughter to blow it getting slobbering drunk and stripping in public.
To: Bubba_Leroy
Pretty silly lawsuit. She's trying to claim she was forced to drink and forced to strip somehow. I'm sure the film isn't good evidence for her case --most likely it shows her very willing to drink and bare herself for the cameras.
4
posted on
05/14/2002 9:35:30 PM PDT
by
FITZ
To: Bubba_Leroy
In a previous interview, he said the video caused Kulhanek to drop out of school for a semester. It's the video's fault, not the drunken bimbo's.
To: FITZ
Yep, I really doubt that those drinks ordered themselves and were administered intraveneously against her will.
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: Bubba_Leroy
Maybe next time They’ll get the release signed and pay the person.
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: Newbomb Turk
Amber...
10
posted on
05/14/2002 10:08:21 PM PDT
by
Southack
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: Bubba_Leroy
Back when I was a kid I got so drunk that I passed out. I couldn't have done anything then. But I have never been concious and not been able to say no to anything I didn't want to do.
I'm sorry ladies, the guys asked if you'd flash for the camera and you flashed for the camera. Dumb, da, dumb, dumb...
When these videos were first shot, the producers didn't get release forms. Hey, they asked the women for permission and the women gladly flashed for them. After being sued a few times, they now get release forms.
Strangely, the women sign them and keep flashing. Like this girl and others wouldn't have. How stupid.
To: Bubba_Leroy
You should have put a disclaimer on your post. Some of that material over there is too ripe for no warning.
To: Southack
I like your photo better. Cute.
To: DoughtyOne
To: DoughtyOne
No release is required in a public place. In a public place you have no expectation of privacy. Whether it's for "news" or for "profit" doesn't really make any difference.
16
posted on
05/14/2002 10:51:10 PM PDT
by
DB
To: Bubba_Leroy
LOL, I can see the resemblence if I look real close...
To: DB
Thanks DB. Sounds reasonable to me.
To: Southack
Ewwww! A blond version of Paula Jones, near as I can tell...
To: Lazamataz
AWW Come On! You're not married yet! ; )
She's cute, and that's coming from a "morena" man.
Lazamataz - getting all committed and monogamous on us!
My buddy has a saying down here in SoFlo. It goes "Cazado pero no capado!"
Married, but still "intact" - LOL!
(OK, so in reality I'm considered "whipped". The day I explained to my wife what a "Colombian Nectie" was, she thought it was FUNNY. It kind of put the relationship into perspective for me! *grin*)
Congrats and many, many years of happiness to you btw!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
