Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul/Liberty Com: NO ICC 4 USA (a message of thanks and support to President Bush)
The Liberty Committee ^ | May 5, 2002 | Dr. Ron Paul

Posted on 05/05/2002 6:15:41 AM PDT by madfly

Home - About Us - Subscribe - Contribute - Contact





Legislation Key Votes
Action Alert
Take Action No ICC for USA!

It appears that President Bush will rescind America's signature to the International Criminal Court (ICC) treaty in the coming days. Please send a message of thanks and support to President Bush.

Privacy Statement

© 2001  The Liberty Committee



TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: globalization; icc; libertycommittee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
If links don't work go to URL in Header.
1 posted on 05/05/2002 6:15:41 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OWK, Patriot76, Mulder, RLK, sinkspur, VRW Conspirator, Iscool, shield, supercat, brityank, Ho
ping for Action
2 posted on 05/05/2002 6:17:42 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2Jedismom; 2sheep; Aliska;Aquinasfan; argee; Askel5; arielb; Artist;backhoe; B4Ranch...
ping for Action.
3 posted on 05/05/2002 6:18:20 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Wow! The Ron Paul mafia thanking President Bush for something? You guys must be hitting hard on that medical marijuana. :)
4 posted on 05/05/2002 6:19:36 AM PDT by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod, MeeknMing, VOA, classygreeneyedblonde, untenured
Send "Thank You" to President Bush Here

5 posted on 05/05/2002 6:20:51 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: madfly
Keep FR posted on this. This is an important action on Dubya's part, if true.

Clinton's signing this POS document in the last days of his administration (regime) was extremely abhorent to me.

7 posted on 05/05/2002 6:30:13 AM PDT by DoctorMichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: madfly
I got this in my email yesterday. Thanks for the ping anyway.
8 posted on 05/05/2002 6:34:08 AM PDT by Brownie74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Signed and bumped! :O)
9 posted on 05/05/2002 6:43:59 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DoctorMichael
Keep FR posted on this. This is an important action on Dubya's part, if true. Clinton's signing this POS document in the last days of his administration (regime) was extremely abhorent to me.

There's no plan in the Senate to ratify this treaty. What's the big deal?

10 posted on 05/05/2002 6:47:06 AM PDT by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
Because, politics being what they are, Clintigula's signing of treaties like this tends to lend a legitimacy and momentum to their implementation.
11 posted on 05/05/2002 6:52:58 AM PDT by DoctorMichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brownie74
Thanks for reminding me to post the email, too.

May 4, 2002
Over a year of our work and more than 160,000 petitions to President Bush might be about to pay off. Congressman Ron Paul's staff has been working with White House staff during the last several weeks to arrange delivery of those petitions by Congressman Paul. The press reported last night and today that the Bush administration is on the brink of announcing the "unsigning" of the International Criminal Court (ICC) treaty.

This significant first step is long overdue. Congressman Paul submitted the first bill calling on the president to denounce the ICC and rescind the U.S. signature on February 8, 2001. Earlier action on the part of the U.S. to rescind America's signature to the ICC treaty would have sent a strong signal to the countries that have since gone on to ratify the treaty.

Unfortunately, President Bush's expected action will be too late to block the formation of this new U.N world court because with over 60 treaty ratifications the ICC became a reality on April 11, 2002 -- a reality we must still fight by passing Congressman Paul's H.R. 4169, the American Servicemember and Citizen Protection Act of 2002.

Word of a President Bush's pending announcement comes as a big blow to the world-government types and they will not take it lying down. Unfortunately in Washington, such advance notice can be a carefully orchestrated signal to the "other side" that allows for last-minute brinkmanship to turn the tide. You can be sure pressure is mounting to keep President Bush from rescinding America's signature to the ICC treaty that former President Clinton authorized just hours before he left office.

Please, don't let up on our pressure. Use the link below to send a message to President Bush thanking him for his courage and for standing up for America and our men and women in uniform. Encourage him to stand firm and to resist the pressure he will surely get from those who believe in world government instead of America's constitutional republic.

Take action to ensure we are not robbed by some last-minute compromise. Send your message of support and thanks to President Bush now by clicking

http://capwiz.com/liberty/issues/alert/?alertid=148838&type=PR

Then, enjoy what your efforts have achieved. This is how the system can work to save our precious liberties that, without your active involvement, we will assuredly continue to lose.

Thank you for making this possible. Stay alert!

Kent Snyder
The Liberty Committee
http://www.thelibertycommittee.org

To contribute to our campaign, go to
https://www.ifr-ors.com/wpr.cfm?wp=149


12 posted on 05/05/2002 6:53:09 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DoctorMichael
Because, politics being what they are, Clintigula's signing of treaties like this tends to lend a legitimacy and momentum to their implementation.

But without the Senate's ratification, it has no effect of law. I see your point but I don't think its that big a deal. However, it would looks sweet for Bush to recind it. Another finger in Clinton's eye.

13 posted on 05/05/2002 6:55:08 AM PDT by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: madfly
I'll thank bush when he actually rescinds the signature.
14 posted on 05/05/2002 6:58:56 AM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78, betsyross60,TLI, LarryLied, LiteKeeper, CreekerFreeper, Abn1508, Chapita, Salvation, goo
ping for action.
15 posted on 05/05/2002 7:00:18 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
..........don't think its that big a deal..........

Things like this tend to take on a life of their own. It's better to practice the old adage "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure" and squash this before some leftist human rights group (ala the Kyoto Treaty) spins our non-interest into an international incident at some later date, when they can gain some advantage.

16 posted on 05/05/2002 7:13:45 AM PDT by DoctorMichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Free the USA, seamole, kitchen, nunya bidness, SierraWasp, Ernest_at_the_Beach, freefly, expose,
ping
17 posted on 05/05/2002 7:20:12 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Thanks for the effort, I'm sure it'll do some good, but guys like George Bush don't listen to people like us, I don't think. IMHO, anyway.

"LG"

18 posted on 05/05/2002 7:29:22 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Maybe add to the text of the lettter a mention how the Serbs are mistreated by the Hague kangaroo court.

Hague is not a good omen for the Americans, Israelis and others. "Do not ask for whom the bell tols, it tols for thee."

19 posted on 05/05/2002 7:44:43 AM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ME4W
Additional Liberty Committee Legislation:

Protect our Military!
Bill # H.R.4169

Official Title as Introduced:
Protect our Military!

Status:
04/11/2002: Referred to the House Committee on International Relations.

Committee/Subcommittee Activity:
International Relations: Referral

Amendment(s):
***NONE***

Sponsor/Cosponsor(s) 25

Summary:
Protect our Military from the Clutches of the International Criminal Court!
The International Criminal Court (ICC) became a reality on April 11, 2002. Congressman Ron Paul along with 18 other members of the U.S. House responded the same day by introducing H.R. 4169 -- The American Servicemember and Citizen Protection Act of 2002.

The ICC is now in session and our fellow Americans who serve in uniform are now facing a new danger. They protect us. The time has come for us to protect them. H.R. 4169 -- THE AMERICAN SERVICEMEMBER AND CITIZEN PROTECTION ACT OF 2002

SECTION 2. FINDINGS. Clause 12: "The International Criminal Court...puts United States citizens in jeopardy of unlawful and unconstitutional criminal prosecution, with members of the United States Armed Forces placed especially at risk of politically motivated arrests, prosecutions, fine, and imprisonments for acts engaged in for the protection of the sovereignty and independence of the United States."

SECTION 2. FINDINGS. Clause 13: "United States citizens generally, and members of the United States Armed Forces in particular, deserve the full protection of the Constitution of the United States -- the very body of law the members of the Armed Forces risk life and limb to protect."

SECTION 3. RESCISSION OF SIGNATURE: "The President of the United States should formally rescind the signature approving the Statute of the International Criminal Court made on behalf of the United States...."

SECTION 4. PROHIBITION OF FUNDS: "No funds appropriated or otherwise made available by the United States Government for any purpose may be used in any manner for the establishment or operation of the International Criminal Court."

SECTION 5. PROTECTION OF MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES: "(a) Actions Against Members of the Armed Forces. -- Any action taken by or on behalf of the International Criminal Court against any member of the United States Armed Forces shall be considered to be an act of aggression against the United States."


20 posted on 05/05/2002 7:49:14 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson