It's too bad the LP can't win, at least not in my lifetime. Despite his faults, in every way Browne is vastly superior to Bush -- and Browne shows greater understanding and respect for the Constitution.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: Commie Basher
Got your flame retardant suit on?
2 posted on
04/18/2002 5:50:17 AM PDT by
otterpond
To: Commie Basher
But where something has actually happened foreign aid, farm subsidies, education, health care, campaign-finance reform, corporate welfare, and much more he's expanding government at a blinding pace, just as Al Gore probably would have done.
HA! But that doesn't seem to matter to folks around here blindly and ignorantly towing the party line and licking boots whenever possible (MMMMMMMMM tasty!).
To: Commie Basher
As you say, there's no way that Browne will ever get more than 2 or 3 percent of the vote. And for good reason.
Is George Bush perfect? No. Is he as similar to Al Gore as this article pretends? No. I'll take the tax cut, the ban on abortion funding abroad, the movement toward a missile defense, and the resolute action in Afghanistan (if not yet in the Middle East). If Al Gore had stolen the election, things would be very much worse than they are now.
Plus, after watching the last campaign, I have problems thinking that the Libertarian Party is truly conservative on many issues. The impression I had was all talk and no action, and great emphasis on me, me, me.
4 posted on
04/18/2002 5:53:35 AM PDT by
Cicero
To: Commie Basher
Browne and most libertarians have a simple problem of wanting all or nothing, their way or the highway. Until they start playing the game by fighting for the hearts and minds of the people, and realize that the change they want will take years, they will remain a marginalized party.
To: Commie Basher
So far you've got very little resistance on this thread from the W bootlickers. Since most are also Israel bootlickers, his handling of the Mideast has probably ticked them off.
To: Commie Basher
He opposed the Kyoto agreement on global warming, while Al Gore supported it. But since the Senate had already rejected the treaty, it doesn't matter what the president thinks about it. Simply put, Browne is wrong on this. The treaty has never been submitted to the Senate.
The Senate, on its own, passed a "sense of the Senate" resolution rejecting Kyoto by 95 - 0, or some such. But the treaty is still out there. Algore eventually would have submitted it for ratification.
My hat is off to Bush for having the intestinal fortitude to reject the whole idea.
18 posted on
04/18/2002 6:35:21 AM PDT by
Ole Okie
To: Commie Basher
Not wanting to be a fool, Too late, Harry.
19 posted on
04/18/2002 6:47:24 AM PDT by
Cable225
To: Commie Basher
Pretty accurate summary. Alan Keyes in 2004!
To: Commie Basher
The LP bitches and moans that George Bush hasn't done anything, and then it proceeds to run LP candidates for Senate in various states, ensuring that Democrats get elected, who fight George Bush at every turn. Of course Bush cannot do everything with a hostile Senate. And yes, there are a few RINOs that don't make it easy either.
If Harry Browne were President, but Congress was the same as it is now, would things be any different?
21 posted on
04/18/2002 6:55:48 AM PDT by
Koblenz
To: Commie Basher
It's too bad the LP can't win, at least not in my lifetime.Unfortunately, there just doesn't seem to be much popular demand for smaller government these days. It's going to take a massive change in the way Americans think about government before they demand leaders who are seriously committed to getting Leviathan back on its leash.
To: Commie Basher
bump for Harry and truth -- and you, brave sir, for posting this
25 posted on
04/18/2002 7:35:57 AM PDT by
Tauzero
To: Commie Basher
Harry is a two-time loser. Didn't exactly fire-up the masses on either occasion. He believes Ho Chi Minh was a "democrat" (small 'd')and unfortunately, has been able to inculcate this false belief in a few Libertarians. He immediately jumped on America in the post-9-11 environ.
The LP was started in Colorado 31 years ago and apparently reached it's zenith with the successful takeover of the Leadville City Council. First order of business? "Hey DUDE! Roll one up and let's go climb a mountain!"
The most famous libertarian is Ron Paul, and he has been a Republican for some time now. I get his cookbook. I am a $upporter of his. But Harry Browne? LP needs to put him out to pasture. Why wait for the third strike?
They have some good ideas. Pro-Second Amendment, anti-tax, favor smaller gov. etc. But their ability to convince others is sorely lacking. Perhaps the liberty Caucus inside the Republican Party is the way to go? You know, take over the Republican P. from within? Hell, it worked for the Communists. I mean the look what they have done to the once proud Democrat Party!
35 posted on
04/18/2002 9:32:09 AM PDT by
donozark
To: Commie Basher
If you don't ask for what you want if you don't demand what you want as the price of your support you shouldn't be surprised that you never get what you really want.But principles don't matter. Remember? All that matters is getting a Republican in the White House. Who cares if he acts as bad or worse than Gore? We just want to win. Win at any cost.
Or at least that was the GOP mantra during the election.
To: Commie Basher
Bwahahahaha. Hairy Browny is such a treasure!
76 posted on
04/18/2002 1:41:16 PM PDT by
verity
To: Commie Basher
During the Presidential campaign, most Libertarians on FR told us that Harry Browne was a great guy, running an excellent campaign, and was a walking platform for what Libertarianism meant.
After the campaign, Harry came out and screamed bloody murder attacking the U.S. campaign in Afghanistan, not to mention Harry reminded everyone of his pro-choice and open borders views. Libertarians on FR immediately told us that Harry Browne ran a lousy campaign for President, did NOT represent the views of "most Libertarians" (and that the LP "leaders" had disavowed Harry's columns)-- not to mention grassroot Libertarians had abandoned him for Ron Paul and Barry Hess.
Now, Harry attacks Bush again for not being conservative enough. Most Libertarians on FR tell us that Harry Browne is a great guy and is a walking platform for what Libertarianism means. And, of course, he'd make a great president.
I sure wish you guys would be consistant here.
77 posted on
04/18/2002 1:44:06 PM PDT by
BillyBoy
To: Commie Basher
.0003% of the vote has spoken!
To: Commie Basher
Dubya also pulled abortion funding.
That's a +
Then, you have the CFR cave and all the rest that the "wet panties for bush" crowd try so hard to spin.
112 posted on
04/18/2002 5:00:34 PM PDT by
Jhoffa_
To: All
117 posted on
04/18/2002 6:14:15 PM PDT by
Bob J
To: Commie Basher
"There ain't a dimes worth of difference between the democrats and republicans" (George Wallace, 1968)
To: Commie Basher
A libertarian suckfest at the bitter teat of Harry Browne, perpetual loser and master of whine.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson