[BillyBoy]

During the Presidential campaign, most Libertarians on FR told us that Harry Browne was a great guy, running an excellent campaign, and was a walking platform for what Libertarianism meant.

After the campaign, Harry came out and screamed bloody murder attacking the U.S. campaign in Afghanistan, not to mention Harry reminded everyone of his pro-choice and open borders views. Libertarians on FR immediately told us that Harry Browne ran a lousy campaign for President, did NOT represent the views of "most Libertarians" (and that the LP "leaders" had disavowed Harry's columns)-- not to mention grassroot Libertarians had abandoned him for Ron Paul and Barry Hess.

Now, Harry attacks Bush again for not being conservative enough. Most Libertarians on FR tell us that Harry Browne is a great guy and is a walking platform for what Libertarianism means. And, of course, he'd make a great president.

I sure wish you guys would be consistant here.

[WhiteGuy]

You have a better memory than I do....

How about posting some examples to show us how inconsistant we are?

Thanks in advance.