Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Citizen who fired at robbery suspects may be in trouble
Seattle Times ^ | April 14, 2002 | Gina Kim

Posted on 04/14/2002 11:27:27 AM PDT by eeman

SNOHOMISH — Police yesterday questioned the actions of an armed citizen who opened fire on suspects in a robbery of a neighborhood jewelry store. They said prosecutors will consider charges against him. Neighbors and the owner of the store praised the man as a hero and good Samaritan.

One of the suspects was wounded when the man, identified by witnesses as Brian Wyatt Haynes, 51, the owner of a nearby antiques and watch-repair store, shot out the tire of the getaway car and then fired at least one round through the rear window of the fleeing vehicle.

-------SNIP--------

"This is not the time to be a hero," Snohomish Police Chief Rob Sofie said yesterday. "The Police Department emphasizes that the protection of someone's personal safety is always, always more important than the protection of property.

-------SNIP-------

Sofie said police were still investigating and that prosecutors ultimately would decide whether the shooter should be charged. Possible charges could range from felony assault to unlawful discharge of a firearm, a misdemeanor.

Two men entered the Sachi Fine Jewelry & Design just before noon Friday. They used pepper spray on one employee and struck the store's owner, 52-year-old Brad Jorgensen, with what he said was either a hammer or a gun, which they then used to smash jewelry cases. Jorgensen was treated at a local hospital and released.

-------SNIP-------

Jorgensen, who was back at his store yesterday, praised Haynes, calling him a good Samaritan.

"He was very responsible in the way he handled the matter," he said. "I probably would have done the same thing."

Jorgensen wasn't alone in those feelings.

"I don't think he did anything wrong; I don't think he should be punished," said Jason Milsom, who was working at his family's business, Black Cat Antiques, directly across the street from the jewelry store, at the time of the robbery.

"But I don't think everyone should run around with guns. In this case, it worked out OK. But it could have turned out much different."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; guncontrol; seattle; snohomish
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
Someone posted an article about this yesterday from the Everett Herald( a town outside of Seattle). One of the responses to yesterday's post predicted that local prosecutors would more likely go after the citizen that the robbers, I guess they were right.

Maybe the robbers will get some type of commendation since they used pepper spray

1 posted on 04/14/2002 11:27:27 AM PDT by eeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: eeman; bang_list
Policing (at least from the viewpoints of most chiefs and politicans) is no longer about "protect and serve".

Instead, it is about job security, empire building, testing social theories, and control over the local populace.

Most of them would rather have a murderer go free than have a law-abiding citizen use force to stop a criminal.

2 posted on 04/14/2002 11:30:45 AM PDT by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eeman
Here in Virginia, this guy would be acquitted by a jury of his peers unless he had the misfortune to shoot in extreme N VA close to DC. In DC, where handguns are verboten, they are having a turf battle and the Police can't get anyone to talk about what is going on. Pin a medal on this guy and return him to service. To do otherwise is to chill response from responsible gun owners to murderous circumstances.
3 posted on 04/14/2002 11:37:02 AM PDT by Movemout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eeman
Police Chief Sofie of Snohomish, talking about the incident at Sachi's, "...personal safety is always, always more important than the protection of property."

The article states the robbers assulted the clerk and store owner before they stole anything. This police chief is not qualified to 'serve' because he cannot even observe correctly. He completely ignores the assult part of this robbery. He is definitely promoting "safety is more important than liberty and freedom" propaganda.

4 posted on 04/14/2002 11:44:48 AM PDT by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eeman
"In this case, it worked out OK. But it could have turned out much different." Typically liberal mentality when it comes to firearms. Disregard what *actually* happened and instead focus on some imaginary scenario that *could* have happened. How about, the clerk, *could* have died from being hit on the head with a hammer? This guy can't handle the truth.
5 posted on 04/14/2002 11:50:37 AM PDT by garibaldi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eeman
--sorry, folks, but in almost all jurisdictions, it is unlawful for civilians to shoot at a fleeing felon or felons. That is one of the first things you should learn vis-a-vis carrying a firearm--
6 posted on 04/14/2002 12:04:21 PM PDT by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eeman
...personal safety is always, always more important than the protection of property.

Civilized society promotes personal safety. I don't see how there can be civilization without the right to have and hold personal property. That implies the right to protect personal property. Of course their should be balance and justice. You shouldn't be subject to death for the theft of a quarter.

The point is that personal safety is not always, always more important tham the protection of property.

7 posted on 04/14/2002 12:17:21 PM PDT by KrisKrinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eeman
They said prosecutors will consider charges against him.

Neighbors and the owner of the store praised the man as a hero and good Samaritan.

Good luck with that prosecution, bozos...

8 posted on 04/14/2002 12:20:50 PM PDT by sargon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garibaldi
"In this case, it worked out OK. But it could have turned out much different." Typically liberal mentality when it comes to firearms.

Enforcement types tend to apply their officer "order book" requirements to civilian use of weapons. As I said on the earlier thread this situation clearly was out of bounds per the type restrictions applied to officers AND civiliams. The bad guys were fleeing, so no longer a direct threat to the civilian shooter or the robbery victims.

I wouldn't be surprised to see the civilian charged. However, my prediction is a jury would find him not guilty, since most citizens believe the action WAS justified and the right thing to do.

9 posted on 04/14/2002 12:26:02 PM PDT by toddst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
it is unlawful for civilians to shoot at a fleeing felon or felons

What is the name of the crime that a person who shoots at a fleeing felon or felons is charged with?

10 posted on 04/14/2002 12:47:09 PM PDT by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: MosesKnows
--depending on the outcome of the situation and the statutes in the jurisdiction it occurs, it could very well be a form of homicide--check with your local lawyer--
12 posted on 04/14/2002 1:43:11 PM PDT by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
sorry, folks, but in almost all jurisdictions, it is unlawful for civilians to shoot at a fleeing felon or felons.

Damn. Talk about wet blankets....

13 posted on 04/14/2002 1:47:53 PM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: eeman
They will not charge him. They are doing this for public consumption to discourage vigilantism.

If they were to charge him he would never NEVER ever be convicted by a jury in Snohomish county. All his lawyer would have to do is draw a line east of I-5 and North of Mill Creek, preempt everbody outside of that area and the resulting jury would pin him a medal, pipe him aboard every day he walked into court and then throw him a barbecue after the trial.

14 posted on 04/14/2002 4:29:12 PM PDT by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows
What is the name of the crime that a person who shoots at a fleeing felon or felons is charged with?

felonious discharge of course...

or premature eradication

how about vehicular homicide

15 posted on 04/14/2002 8:19:43 PM PDT by teeman8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KrisKrinkle
Roger that.

Our personal property is -- in part -- a distillation or condensation of our lives and represents the time we invested WORKING to acquire it.

The Founders considered it important enough to discuss it in the Declaration of Independence with the phrase "...the pursuit of Happiness."

During that period of our language's evolution, that phrase was understood by all to be the right to freely acquire and hold PROPERTY!

The citizens of this jurisdiction should cashier the so-called public officials who are ignorant of this basic fact.

16 posted on 04/14/2002 9:15:56 PM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
--sorry, folks, but in almost all jurisdictions, it is unlawful for civilians to shoot at a fleeing felon or felons. That is one of the first things you should learn vis-a-vis carrying a firearm--

You are wrong. In the State of Washington, you can shoot a fleeing felon, especially if they have been warned to stop. This is a no brainer and the prosecutor will not file charges against the good samaritan. If fact, a private citizen has more leeway in using deadly force than a law enforcement official.

17 posted on 04/19/2002 3:47:15 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: all
Once again, I will go find the Washington statutes that prove the good samaritan was merely exercising his rights under the Washington statutes as well as the U.S. Constitution.
18 posted on 04/19/2002 3:50:55 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: eeman
Two men entered the Sachi Fine Jewelry & Design just before noon Friday. They used pepper spray on one employee and struck the store's owner, 52-year-old Brad Jorgensen, with what he said was either a hammer or a gun, which they then used to smash jewelry cases. Jorgensen was treated at a local hospital and released.
And some vigilante Bozo USED A GUN??? Good thing Washington is a liberal-dominated state. They know how to make it safe for people to continue the above activities.
19 posted on 04/19/2002 3:53:54 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eeman
the cops cant do the job. crime does pay. the prosecutor is criminal.
20 posted on 04/19/2002 4:00:19 PM PDT by galt-jw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson