Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oklahoma: Limits on smoking draw fire
Associated Press ^ | April 8, 2002 | A/P Staff

Posted on 04/08/2002 6:05:00 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP


Oklahoma: Limits on smoking draw fire

Oklahoma politicians say health board lacks authority to enact rules

04/08/2002

Associated Press

OKLAHOMA CITY - Rules that would ban smoking in most public places have sparked a turf battle between the Board of Health, which adopted them, and state lawmakers who say that the rules flout state law.

But members of the Board of Health and state officials who support a ban on smoking say the issue runs deeper than the law. They say the real issue is public health.

"Smoking is still so ingrained in our society that we don't think of it as a health issue. But this is a real health problem in Oklahoma," said Rep. Ray Vaughn, R-Edmond, co-author of legislation that would ban smoking in the state Capitol and many other government buildings.

Gov. Frank Keating and the House Administrative Rule Review Committee last week rejected the Board of Health's rules, which would ban smoking in restaurants, theaters, sports arenas, malls and most other places visited by the public.

Mr. Keating and the committee said the board overstepped its legal authority by adopting administrative rules that conflict with state law.

Although the rules would ban smoking in most indoor public places, existing law permits it in designated areas.

The law prevents administrative rules regarding smoking from pre-empting legislative guidelines.

Dr. Jay Gregory, a Muskogee surgeon and former chairman of the Board of Health, said the board acted out of frustration with legislative lethargy.

"We took it to the limit, and the committee said no," he said.

Health officials say smoking kills 6,200 people in Oklahoma each year.

While rejecting the rules, Mr. Keating said he objects to secondhand smoke and urged lawmakers pass measures to protect Oklahomans from that.


Online at: http://www.dallasnews.com/texassouthwest/stories/040802dntexsmoke.2cbe.html


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: nonsmoking; publichealth; pufflist; smokinglaws
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 04/08/2002 6:05:00 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
fyi........
2 posted on 04/08/2002 6:05:32 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Check out this previous post on same subject entitled: Capitol No Smoking Bill Watered Down - Lawmakers can smoke in their offices

Just adds to the outrage :) Thanks for the update too!
3 posted on 04/08/2002 6:10:27 AM PDT by chance33_98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
What is so weird about all of this is that I have never seen so many smokers as I did when we moved from South Texas to Norman, OK. As a non-smoker, I really noticed the amount of smokers -- like I was one of only a few not smoking when I went to baseball games of my son's High School team or band parent meetings.
4 posted on 04/08/2002 6:21:33 AM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
"Health officials say smoking kills 6,200 people in Oklahoma each year."

Not 6,244 or 6,187? I would ask, and always ask, just what scientific data and model was used to come up with that number.

There are ads running in Arizona claiming some totally rediculous number and I have asked for the science behind such proclamations and have received NO answers. In other words, they pull these numbers out of the brown and fuzzy and then use them to further their agenda. ALWAYS ASK FOR VERIFICATION!

5 posted on 04/08/2002 6:24:20 AM PDT by lawdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puff_List
puff
6 posted on 04/08/2002 6:27:10 AM PDT by Just another Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I quit over 19 years ago. Glad I did, too. My Mom passed away last
year and the Death Cert lists tobacco as a contributing factor.
She smoked for over 50 years and the last 4 years of her life she
was on oxygen 24 hours a day. She quit a year before her death.
I remember about 3 months before she died, she told me that
she wishes she had quit smoking long before she did.
What could I say? "I know, Mom, so do I".......
I tried back in the 70s to get her to quit, but gave up on that project
because it just aggravated her and I didn't want to cause a rift in
our relationship.
7 posted on 04/08/2002 6:33:00 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe
Hey, Joe! :O)
8 posted on 04/08/2002 6:34:12 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lawdude
The numbers are always high and always different. I, too, would like to know where "they" come up with these numbers.

It's rediculous.

9 posted on 04/08/2002 6:36:16 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
What in the Oklahoma constitution or America's constitution gives the government the right to dictate public health?If anyone says,"to promote the public good",YOUR WRONG and i suggest you look up the word PROMOTE in the dictonary.To PROMOTE only means to encourage or educate NOT DICTATE!
10 posted on 04/08/2002 6:45:16 AM PDT by INSENSITIVE GUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
But members of the Board of Health and state officials who support a ban on smoking say the issue runs deeper than the law. They say the real issue is public health.complete and absolute control over peoples lives by the socialist busy bodies.

If people are allowed to choose abortion or AIDs, both deadly, how can they possibly harrass smokers? Outlaw them all, or none.

11 posted on 04/08/2002 6:54:20 AM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
My father in law who is 86 has been smoking since he was 16 and still doing great. I think it all depends on the person.
12 posted on 04/08/2002 7:33:21 AM PDT by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
My father in law who is 86 has been smoking since he was 16
and still doing great. I think it all depends on the person.

Yes, I think it does a lot. My best buddies Mom smokes still and she's pushing 80.
And she's going strong. She only smokes a few a day though.
There is some evidence, I think, regarding genetic markers or whatever
that are with you when you're born that determines your liklihood of cancer.
But I think that had my Mom quit 20 years earlier, at least her
quality of life would have been better, IMHO.......
13 posted on 04/08/2002 7:41:51 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
But members of the Board of Health and state officials who support a ban on smoking say the issue runs deeper than the law. They say the real issue is public health.

So if we all find a cause running deeper than the law.......WE CAN BREAK SAID LAW. ??

14 posted on 04/08/2002 7:42:49 AM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
E.G.C. Oklahoma BTTT!!!!
15 posted on 04/08/2002 7:50:35 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Great Dane
Great Dane: not when 44 states are in the pocket of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. This corporation is the biggest smoker hater in the U.S.

When the states that are in their pocket receive huge grants for banning and taxing smokers, what state, especially with their budget problems, is going to give that up?

It's a very hard war we fight. Especially since we do not have the honey pot of wealth like THEY do...........


16 posted on 04/08/2002 7:51:15 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Sorry to hear that about your Mom -- my Dad was the same way. He quit several years before he died but by that time a lot of damage had been done! No amount of convincing would make him quit before he got really sick, but it had a huge affect on my brother and I -- neither of us smoke!
17 posted on 04/08/2002 9:09:52 AM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lawdude
It's not just numbers they pull out of a hat.

About a year or so ago the State of Delaware Health Department was running ads claiming that exposure to second hand smoke CAUSES asthma. Not that it might bring on an attack - but CAUSES the affliction.

I called the Department of Health and Social Services and questioned the information. I got a great deal of grief for being "one of those people" what people are those, I asked - "the pro-smokers." I explained that while I was a smoker, I wasn't a pro-smoker, I was just a proponent of honesty, especially when it came to the spending of tax payer money.

I'm still waiting for the Department to get back to me with the information on which they based their claims, but the ads never ran on any channel on the local cable system again.

Demanding VERIFICATION is a very good deterrent!!!

18 posted on 04/08/2002 6:05:32 PM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
If people are allowed to choose abortion or AIDs, both deadly, how can they possibly harrass smokers? Outlaw them all, or none.

Good points.

Being exposed to someone else's cigarette smoke is at best an annoyance, at worst it can aggravate a pre-existing medical condition. Abortion and AIDS always end in death.

I don't know dollar figures, nor do I have anything at my fingertips to cite - but more money is spent on seeking a cure for AIDS than on seeking a cure for lung cancer. And more money is spent harrassing smokers by the people that should be researching cures for lung cancer than is being spent on that research.

I'm not looking to outlaw anything - except using the money of people being harrassed to perpetuate the harrassment.

19 posted on 04/08/2002 6:16:41 PM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom;MeeknMing
Gotta say, this is one of the few times recently that I agree with Keating. I'm a former smoker (5 years now), and although I'm very much in the "anti" column, I believe these unelected boards need to be reigned in.

No saint like a reformed sinner, as they say! I lost my father to lung cancer some years back. He had quit tobacco 15 years earlier, but we all knew, as did he, that the cigarettes were the cause.

The Okie legislature has quite a history of legislating for others but, making sure their laws dont impact them. A lawyer acquaintance who is a former legislator told me some years back, that there is (or was) a law in Oklahoma that prohibited chicken theft - except when the legislature was in session!

Something about foxes and henhouses comes to mind.

20 posted on 04/08/2002 6:29:21 PM PDT by Don Carlos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson