Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BBC Predicts Bush's Stance=tension with hardliners in his cabinet and with Israel
BBC ^ | April 4, 2002 | Jon Leyne

Posted on 04/04/2002 5:55:45 PM PST by jraven

Analysis: US policy change carries risks

By Jon Leyne BBC Washington correspondent

Under intense pressure at home and abroad, President Bush has finally taken decisive action to intervene in the Middle East. This is a major change of policy that carries many risks for the President.

In his speech in the White House Rose Garden, Mr Bush began with the usual calls on Yasser Arafat to control terrorism.

"Terror must be stopped. No nation can negotiate with terrorists, for there is no way to make peace with those whose only goal is death."

But Mr Bush went on to demand for the first time that the Israeli Government should begin withdrawing its forces from the Palestinian cities recently occupied.

"I speak as a committed friend of Israel," he insisted. "I speak out of a concern for its long-term security, the security that will come with a genuine peace."

'Collision course' But the president went much further than just calling for a ceasefire. He outlined a vision of the future of the Middle East. That vision includes the most explicit calls to date for a viable Palestinian state and more pressure on the Israeli Government to stop settlement activity.

"Israel should also show a respect, a respect for and concern about the dignity of the Palestinian people who are and will be their neighbours," he urged. Those demands present a major challenge to the government of Ariel Sharon. They could set Israel and the United States on a collision course. Final warning to Arafat President Bush's speech also contained what look like ominous words for Yasser Arafat.

"As Israel steps back, responsible Palestinian leaders and Israel's Arab leaders must step forward... I expect better leadership and I expect results."

That will be read, in some quarters, as a final warning to the Palestinian leader.

The immediate question is whether that final warning will be delivered, in person, by Colin Powell next week.

Already the Israelis have announced that the US envoy, Anthony Zinni, is to be allowed to visit Mr Arafat.

But even if the Israelis are agreeable, the secretary of state would still have to explain why he can meet Mr Arafat when the vice-president ruled it out a couple of weeks ago.

Nevertheless, after days and weeks of internal battles within his administration, the president has finally laid out an ambitious new agenda for the Middle East, that answers many of his critics.

The challenge now is how much political capital he is willing to spend to achieve these goals.

It is an ambitious agenda that puts President Bush on a potential collision course both with the Israeli Government and with hardliners within his own administration.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arafat; bush; foreignpolicy; israel; mideast
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Lady In Blue
"He,like GWB,are alike in that they both value loyalty"

Loyalty's a two-way street.

21 posted on 04/04/2002 7:54:07 PM PST by Tauzero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hoot2
We will have to wait and see. I cannot help but think the fact that al Qaida members are said to be arriving to fight against Israel may be part of the situation here. A call for ceasefire and strong leadership from both parties against terrorism will either work and pull the rug from Al Qaida in this area or we will know for sure that Arafat supports terrorism and there is no alternative but going after them.

I would suggest Arafat get control (if he is not in control) and insure Al Qaida and Saddam are not in the melting pot with him or he will be lumped in with them as we continue our war against terrorism. If terrorism flames after peace efforts - all in the U.S. will realize there is no possibility of peace with terrorism at play.

The situation over there is so flamable and can lead to such disasterous ends that a measure of caution and one further try at peace is possibly warranted. If it doesn't work, the Israelis can continue and beat the socks off of them and take out Arafat.

I don't expect Bush to cave on terrorism in the least. Didn't you catch his anger at the use of a teenage girl as a bomb to kill another teenage girl? A father of two young daughters would be very sensitive to an act like that and I don't think tolerance of it is in the makeup of President Bush.

22 posted on 04/04/2002 7:58:07 PM PST by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: a_witness
If the yellow-bellied peaceniks in State Dept. and Europe get their way, it won't be long before we will hear that call. GRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!
23 posted on 04/04/2002 8:07:58 PM PST by whadizit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: whadizit

24 posted on 04/04/2002 8:14:12 PM PST by a_witness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jraven
A lot of Freepers need to buy a one-way ticket to Israel.
25 posted on 04/04/2002 10:15:20 PM PST by intelman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jraven
Sorry to say, I find most of the comments on this post a bit infantile.

What we are ACTUALLY seeing the the beginning of the endgame.

The doves are being given their last shot at solving this. GWB is a fair enough leader to realize that he will not have the force of CONSENSUS at his disposal if he does not let the doves at least try one more time to clean up this mess.

If it fails, which i suspect it will, THEN you will hear from the hawks. In the meantime, Powells visit (i am no fan of Powell, but believe he is infinitely better than half-bright was) will allow everyone to cool it a bit. Miracles happen, perhaps it will even work...

THIS IS ALL IN CLEARLY IN ISLRAELS BEST INTEREST...

26 posted on 04/05/2002 3:56:25 AM PST by chilepepper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson