Well, they won't be able to blame the next increase in AIDS on Ronald Reagan...or will they anyway?
1 posted on
04/01/2002 4:57:34 PM PST by
Pharmboy
To: Pharmboy
AIDS is no longer a disease but a civil rights status.
To: Pharmboy
I think it is actually a form of "death-wish".
I think that deep inside, gay men who do this hate their lifestyle and hate themselves.
Engaging in unprotected sex could be part of a desire to kill themselves along with a petulant desire to take others with them.
4 posted on
04/01/2002 5:04:51 PM PST by
Ronin
To: Pharmboy
So-called unprotected sex is the rule in all forms of sexual activity. homosexual or heterosexual. It takes the spontaneousness, continuity, and life out of the party to clad yourself in tupperware. This is why condoms will never be effective, homosexually or heterosexually.
5 posted on
04/01/2002 5:05:51 PM PST by
RLK
To: Pharmboy
Filthy, degenerate perverts. They intentionally seek to spread their loathsome diseases amongst themselves and where possible to the rest of the population.
Is it any wonder decent people shun them?
To: Pharmboy
I have a problem with the bi-sexuals transmitting to the hetero pop.
7 posted on
04/01/2002 5:08:41 PM PST by
Osinski
To: Pharmboy
After a night of wild, uninhibited, unprotected sex, these same men hold marches, rallies and what not, shrilly demanding that more and more money be spent on AIDS research, even though that disease gets much more funding than cancer, diabetes, heart disease, etc. combined. And if you don't give, you are a hate mongering homophobe.
To: Pharmboy
I should have known better than to read this before dinner. This article is enough to put me off of my food. Oh well, the truth needs to be known about this and putting your head in the sand is no way to deal with it.
To: Pharmboy
Mansergh and colleagues call for new health promotion strategies to reach men who bareback, Yep. Throw more money at the problem. That'll fix it.
The liberal solution to everything.
To: Pharmboy
Intentional Unsafe Sex Among Gay Men Common: CDC
No-duh! It doesnt take a CDC scientist to know that. It could be also stated that "Downright nasty, perverted sex is prevalent among gay men" too, without too much of a stretch.
To: Pharmboy
Dang, I wish I had never read this post. I may never be able to enjoy a rodeo again!
15 posted on
04/01/2002 5:32:44 PM PST by
Nakota
To: Pharmboy
Intentional Unsafe Sex Among Gay Men Common: CDC
This is about as revolutionary as the scientific studies/surveys showing that
a lot of binge drinking go on at univerities and colleges.
And we pay the salaries (AND retirements!) of these governmental nimrods.
16 posted on
04/01/2002 5:33:04 PM PST by
VOA
To: Pharmboy
We must invest millions in research to cure a disease so these guys can engage in unsafe sex. < /sarcasm>
To: Pharmboy
"There were no differences in the prevalence of barebacking by race or ethnicity, education or income, the report indicates."
Duh-, For once the liberal press couldn't make this into a Race or class war. In other words, Immorality and stupidity doesn't care about race, ethnicity education or income.
19 posted on
04/01/2002 6:00:12 PM PST by
ODDITHER
To: Pharmboy
Don't laugh, they probably will. I am astonished (or maybe not) to see so many homosexuals condemn Reagan for "creating" the AIDS epidemic. In fact it was known back in the early 80's that unprotected anal sex was the chief cause of HIV transmission. David Horowitz related a story about his speaking to a group of homosexuals in San Francisco about that time. The suggestion that male homos restrict their sexual activities in any way to prevent infection was met with derision by the homosexuals present. So much for responsible behavior.
To: Pharmboy
Do the "Darwin Awards" accept group nominations?
24 posted on
04/01/2002 6:13:50 PM PST by
Ahban
To: Pharmboy
non-primary partners Geez, has the CDC created a new name for it? Is it now "primary partner," whereas before it was "life partner?" Maybe it could be "part-time life partner" or "temporary partner" or "gay bar bathroom partner" or "gay bathhouse partner" or whatever. Do taxpayers still have to pay for health insurance? What is the criteria for "life partner?" How long?
This is so funny. I hope the CDC is totally discredited for their asinine pandering to politics rather than focusing on public health.
26 posted on
04/01/2002 6:25:48 PM PST by
PLK
To: Pharmboy
At last, some good news.
To: Pharmboy
You wrote that they won't be able to blame the next AIDS increase on Reagan. Of course they will. When did he ever give a speech warning of the dangers of "barebacking"? I don't remember any such thing ...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson