Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Intentional Unsafe Sex Among Gay Men Common: CDC
Yahoo ^ | 4-1-02 | Anon. Reuters Health Stringer

Posted on 04/01/2002 4:57:34 PM PST by Pharmboy

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Intentional anal sex without a condom--termed "barebacking"--is a relatively common practice among gay and bisexual men, researchers at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (news - web sites) (CDC) report.

A key aspect of barebacking, according to the report, is the intent to engage in unprotected anal sex with someone other than a primary partner.

In the study, the investigators found that 70% of gay or bisexual men interviewed were familiar with the term "barebacking." Of this group, 14% reported that they had barebacked at least once during the past 2 years.

"Intentional unprotected anal sex with non-primary partners is a health concern for gay communities because of the risk of transmitting HIV (news - web sites) or other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) to uninfected men, including treatment-resistant strains, and the potential risk of superinfection in HIV-positive men," according to lead author Dr. Gordon Mansergh and colleagues from the CDC in Atlanta, Georgia.

The results of their investigation, which involved interviews with 554 gay or bisexual men living in San Francisco, were published in the March issue of the journal AIDS (news - web sites).

All of the men were asked about their HIV status and, if they practiced barebacking, why they did so.

Of the men who reported barebacking in the previous 2 years, 22% said they were HIV positive and 10% identified themselves as HIV negative.

"The reason most frequently cited for barebacking was to experience greater physical stimulation; feeling emotionally connected with a partner was also a relatively common reason," the authors write.

There were no differences in the prevalence of barebacking by race or ethnicity, education or income, the report indicates.

Mansergh and colleagues call for new health promotion strategies to reach men who bareback, noting that some HIV-negative men are intentionally putting themselves at risk, while some HIV-positive men are intentionally putting themselves and others at risk for HIV and other STDs.

"Researchers, practitioners and community members should work together and consider holistic health and wellness lifestyle approaches that take multiple human needs into account, particularly for men who bareback," they conclude.

"Barebacking sounds very provocative but all it really is, is unsafe sex," said Marty Algaze, a spokesperson for Gay Men's Health Crisis, a not-for-profit group based in New York City.

"Gay men, especially younger men, who may not have lost any friends to the disease still need to be reminded that even though it may feel emotionally and physically better to have unprotected anal sex, there is no cure for AIDS," Algaze added.

"Anti-HIV drugs are no panacea," Algaze stated, "and many can experience very serious side effects from the drugs."

SOURCE: AIDS 2002;16:653-659.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aids; highrisk; hiv; hypocrisy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Pharmboy
Don't laugh, they probably will. I am astonished (or maybe not) to see so many homosexuals condemn Reagan for "creating" the AIDS epidemic. In fact it was known back in the early 80's that unprotected anal sex was the chief cause of HIV transmission. David Horowitz related a story about his speaking to a group of homosexuals in San Francisco about that time. The suggestion that male homos restrict their sexual activities in any way to prevent infection was met with derision by the homosexuals present. So much for responsible behavior.
21 posted on 04/01/2002 6:04:58 PM PST by driftless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Are you sure that AIDs is the leading cause of death for males ages 25-44? Can you provide the numbers please?
22 posted on 04/01/2002 6:08:55 PM PST by driftless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
You are on to something, Ronin. I think it's time for the American Psychiatric Association to reclassify homosexuality as a mental illness. Gay men have got to be crazy to open themselves up to AIDS deliberately.
23 posted on 04/01/2002 6:13:14 PM PST by Palladin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Do the "Darwin Awards" accept group nominations?
24 posted on 04/01/2002 6:13:50 PM PST by Ahban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r
ROMANS CHAPTER 1 For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. 21 For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles. 24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator--who is forever praised. Amen. 26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion. THE DUE PENALTY OF THEIR PERVERSION
25 posted on 04/01/2002 6:21:19 PM PST by trevorjohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
non-primary partners

Geez, has the CDC created a new name for it? Is it now "primary partner," whereas before it was "life partner?" Maybe it could be "part-time life partner" or "temporary partner" or "gay bar bathroom partner" or "gay bathhouse partner" or whatever. Do taxpayers still have to pay for health insurance? What is the criteria for "life partner?" How long?

This is so funny. I hope the CDC is totally discredited for their asinine pandering to politics rather than focusing on public health.

26 posted on 04/01/2002 6:25:48 PM PST by PLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
At last, some good news.
27 posted on 04/01/2002 6:27:01 PM PST by AD from SpringBay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PLK
Geez, has the CDC created a new name for it? Is it now "primary partner," whereas before it was "life partner?" Maybe it could be "part-time life partner" or "temporary partner" or "gay bar bathroom partner" or "gay bathhouse partner" or whatever. Do taxpayers still have to pay for health insurance? What is the criteria for "life partner?" How long?

A safe, stable, loving home for adopted children? I think NOT!

28 posted on 04/01/2002 6:34:06 PM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RLK
So-called unprotected sex is the rule in all forms of sexual activity. homosexual or heterosexual. It takes the spontaneousness, continuity, and life out of the party to clad yourself in tupperware. This is why condoms will never be effective, homosexually or heterosexually.

Well, you are right, I suppose. But, you are still proposing a physiologic equality between hetero- vs homo- sex. However, the other statistic that the CDC hides (to maintain their P.C. stance) is that HIV is most easily transmitted when blood is exchanged. This occurs readily when the friable rectal tissue is torn during intercourse - meaning that rectal intercourse makes one more susceptible, whether between 2 males or between a male and female. Vaginas are tough, elastic organs that do NOT normally bleed during intercourse (STD's make a person more likely to contract HIV - this is why). Rectums are lined with vascular, easily torn tissue the does bleed easily. Do you get my point? CDC does not want to seem to "discriminate" in this issue.

29 posted on 04/01/2002 6:35:26 PM PST by PLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PLK
Rectums are lined with vascular, easily torn tissue . . .

Rectum? I heard it darn near killed 'em!
30 posted on 04/01/2002 6:39:32 PM PST by AD from SpringBay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: driftless
AIDs is the leading cause of death for males ages 25-44?

The only cause of death that I can imagine being higher would be car accidents.

32 posted on 04/01/2002 7:50:12 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Palladin
You would think that such a decision would be a no-brainer, but obviously it is not.
33 posted on 04/01/2002 8:15:29 PM PST by Ronin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: PLK
Well, you are right, I suppose. But, you are still proposing a physiologic equality between hetero- vs homo- sex.

------------------------------

I am not proposing any such thing. I have been saying here for four years that homosexuality is primarily a serious mental of several types. I've said it elsewhere. However, given the urges of the moment, no matter how distorted, use of condoms is a coarse unromantic unaesthetic interruption that people do not engage in. When I see a movie featuring Angelique Jolie it does not provoke fantasies of going down to the drug store for a gross of condoms.

34 posted on 04/01/2002 9:19:56 PM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
You wrote that they won't be able to blame the next AIDS increase on Reagan. Of course they will. When did he ever give a speech warning of the dangers of "barebacking"? I don't remember any such thing ...
35 posted on 04/02/2002 1:11:31 AM PST by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson