[MeekOneGOP]

And your opinion on their guilt or innocence would be........

I followed the case very closely. My opinion is that the forensic evidence is very damning.
She's guilty, no doubt, IMHO - based on the forensics.......

"Their?" She is guilty. I think Darin had nothing to do with it.........

[WhyisaTexasgirlinPA]

I had a friend who knew Darlie in High School and swore there was no way she could have been guilty.....but I followed the case in Texas too, and thought there was just too much evidence pointing to her....... thanks for the response......

[log_cabin_gop_boy]

The vacuum cleaner on top of the blood stained carpet was key to the conviction.

[cgk]

"Their?" She is guilty. I think Darin had nothing to do with it.........

I think so, too. But I have issues with things like this, which may make him complicit. It seems they couldn't charge him with anything because of a conflict of interest with Darlie's lawyer, who was once (also) his lawyer:

from here

"Also, at this time, Darin Routier admitted that he had looked for someone to burglarize the family home to benefit from an insurance scam, but that he planned to have the burglary occur when the family was not at home."

Darlie also made a comment about not being worried about finances after the boys' deaths because she was getting "$5000 for each of them" in insurance.