Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MeeknMing
"Their?" She is guilty. I think Darin had nothing to do with it.........

I think so, too. But I have issues with things like this, which may make him complicit. It seems they couldn't charge him with anything because of a conflict of interest with Darlie's lawyer, who was once (also) his lawyer:

from here

"Also, at this time, Darin Routier admitted that he had looked for someone to burglarize the family home to benefit from an insurance scam, but that he planned to have the burglary occur when the family was not at home."

Darlie also made a comment about not being worried about finances after the boys' deaths because she was getting "$5000 for each of them" in insurance.

60 posted on 05/21/2003 12:09:46 PM PDT by cgk (It is liberal dogma that human life is an accident - Linda Bowles (r.i.p.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: cgk
Some folks think Darin may know more about the murder than he says. I am skeptical about that, but that's just my opinion.

I think he wasn't charged with murder or as being an accomplice because the police didn't have any/enough evidence to make a case to stick. I think it was Darlie and her alone.

I recall something about the burglary scam too. He tried to hire someone to do it as I recall. Or he talked to someone about it. Something like that.

61 posted on 05/21/2003 12:35:25 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson