Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poor Nations Warn Rich on Terror
Associated Press ^ | Friday, March 22, 2002; 12:00 PM | Julie Watson, Associated Press Writer

Posted on 03/22/2002 9:40:35 AM PST by liberalism=failure

Poor Nations Warn Rich on Terror

MONTERREY, Mexico –– Leaders of poor nations warned their rich counterparts that if they want a world free of terrorism, they will need to pay for it. Leaders of rich nations – including President Bush – said Friday they need to see results if they are to give more money.

"We must tie our aid to political, legal and economic reform and by insisting on reform we do the work of compassion," Bush said in his address to the U.N. International Conference on Financing for Development in the northern Mexican city of Monterrey.

"Pouring money into a failed status quo does little to help the poor," he said, adding: "Liberty and law and opportunity are the conditions for development."

French President Jacques Chirac said poor nations seemed to be getting that message.

"The developing countries have committed themselves to promoting economic growth through good governance and greater recourse to private initiative," he said Friday.

Poor nations at the conference drew a direct link between poverty and violence, saying increased aid to the world's neediest is more urgent than ever in the post-Sept. 11 world.

"In the wake of Sept. 11, we will forcefully demand that development, peace and security are inseparable," said Han Seung-soo, president of the U.N. General Assembly. He said the world's poorest areas are "the breeding ground for violence and despair."

Bush also linked poverty and terrorism, saying: "We fight against poverty because hope is an answer to terror."

The U.S. president outlined a new foreign aid doctrine, saying poor nations must earn additional U.S. funds by rooting out corruption and undertaking serious political reform. He called for "a new compact for development defined by greater accountability for rich and poor nations alike."

The world leaders – two left on Thursday, leaving 50 present – adopted a consensus Friday that urges rich nations to increase development aid and poor nations to use the funds more efficiently.

The leaders also were scheduled to hold a private retreat at an art museum in this modern, industrialized city in northern Mexico.

While both the United States and Europe have promised billions of dollars more in aid in coming years, their pledges fall far short of the $100 billion a year the United Nations has said is needed to cut poverty in half by 2015.

Cuban President Fidel Castro attacked rich nations for demanding that their poor counterparts meet conditions, such as fighting corruption, to receive aid.

"You can't blame this tragedy on the poor countries. It wasn't they who conquered and looted entire continents for centuries, nor did they establish colonialism, nor did they reintroduce slavery, nor did they create modern imperialism," he said. "They were its victims."

Castro left the conference shortly after his speech– and hours before the arrival of Bush – citing "a special situation created by my participation in this summit."

He didn't elaborate, but Ricardo Alarcon, president of Cuba's National Assembly, later told The Associated Press that Castro left because of "a situation that for a self-respecting country like Cuba, was unacceptable," but wouldn't elaborate.

"In the final analysis it is a problem with the United States," Alarcon said. "That doesn't mean that someone from the United States talked to us or asked us to do something."

According to a U.S. official who spoke on condition of anonymity, the U.S. delegation had been instructed to leave the designated U.S. seat when it was Castro's turn to speak, and they did. It was unclear whether that was what had offended Castro.

Most participants agreed the biggest achievement of the summit was getting international leaders, business leaders and activists together to talk about combatting poverty.

Anti-globalization protesters, who have held small marches throughout the week, held their largest demonstration Thursday. About 2,000 protesters massed in front of a police barricade a few blocks from the conference, where they burned an Uncle Sam effigy and hurled dead goats, which they said died from toxic waste from a nearby factory, over the barricades.

But even international finance chiefs addressed some of the issues the protesters have clamored about for years.

"Poverty in all its forms is the greatest single threat to peace, democracy, human rights and the environment," World Trade Organization Director-General Mike Moore said. "It is a time-bomb against the heart of liberty. But it can be conquered and we have the tools in our hands to do so, if only we have the courage and focus to make proper use of them."

Officials said the world's misery affects all.

"We live in one world, not two," said U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan. "No one in this world can feel comfortable, or safe, while so many are suffering and deprived."

© 2002 The Associated Press


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: neomarxists; scapegoaters; terrorism; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
Two facts that need mentioning--

1) Poverty doesn't cause terrorism. Islamic INFIDELAPHOBIA is the cause of terrorism

2) The solution to global poverty IS NOT scapegoating successful nations and extracting their money. The solution to global poverty IS global capitalism.

1 posted on 03/22/2002 9:40:35 AM PST by liberalism=failure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: liberalism=failure
The barbarians demand tribute anyone who has read Gibbon knows paying them means the fall of the empire.
2 posted on 03/22/2002 9:43:26 AM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberalism=failure
The successful prescription for armed violence from the mobs and masses has always been the unsentimental and unabashed application of deadly force.
3 posted on 03/22/2002 9:44:35 AM PST by CatoRenasci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weikel
Funny thing is that William B. Buckley used a similiar argument in a conservative defense of the welfare state, to keep the lower classes from going red.
4 posted on 03/22/2002 9:46:37 AM PST by JohnGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: liberalism=failure
Leaders of poor nations warned their rich counterparts that if they want a world free of terrorism, they will need to pay for it.

Citizens of the United States warn 3rd World despots that if they attempt to extort money from this rich nation, their nations will be turned into big, glowing gopher holes!

5 posted on 03/22/2002 9:48:26 AM PST by Major Matt Mason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
French President Jacques Chirac said poor nations seemed to be getting that message.
Which poor nations would they be, Jacko?
6 posted on 03/22/2002 9:49:22 AM PST by Warren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: liberalism=failure
"Leaders of poor nations warned their rich counterparts that if they want a world free of terrorism, they will need to pay for it."

Is it just me or isn't this more commonly referred to as extortion?

7 posted on 03/22/2002 9:50:44 AM PST by slouper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberalism=failure
Leaders of poor nations warned their rich counterparts that if they want a world free of terrorism, they will need to pay for it.

Time to dust off an oldie but goodie...

MILLIONS FOR DEFENSE.
NOT ONE CENT FOR TRIBUTE!

For the informationally challenged... that's history.

8 posted on 03/22/2002 9:52:26 AM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberalism=failure
Ol' Roddy says it better than I possibly could:

 

DANEGELD

(A.D. 980-1016)

Rudyard Kipling


IT IS always a temptation to an armed and agile nation,
    To call upon a neighbour and to say:—
"We invaded you last night—we are quite prepared to fight,
    Unless you pay us cash to go away."

And that is called asking for Dane-geld,
    And the people who ask it explain
That you've only to pay 'em the Dane-geld
    And then you'll get rid of the Dane!

It is always a temptation to a rich and lazy nation,
    To puff and look important and to say:—
"Though we know we should defeat you, we have not the time to meet you.
    We will therefore pay you cash to go away."

And that is called paying the Dane-geld;
    But we've proved it again and again,
That if once you have paid him the Dane-geld
    You never get rid of the Dane.

It is wrong to put temptation in the path of any nation,
    For fear they should succumb and go astray,
So when you are requested to pay up or be molested,
    You will find it better policy to say:

"We never pay any one Dane-geld,
    No matter how trifling the cost,
For the end of that game is oppression and shame,
    And the nation that plays it is lost!"



9 posted on 03/22/2002 9:52:27 AM PST by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
If unemployment is high enough that revolution is actually a danger then buy off the mobs but once unemployment goes low enough stop buying them off. We should not be buying off 3rd countries under any circumstances.
10 posted on 03/22/2002 9:53:22 AM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: liberalism=failure
What a ridiculous shakedown. First, not all poor countries are producing terrorists. The terrorists are coming from countries harboring radical Islamic groups. Second, most of the 9/11 bombers were not at all poor.
11 posted on 03/22/2002 9:55:16 AM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberalism=failure
Dumping money into countries with no infrastructure to distribute aid, corrupt government, no education, and no freedom is like flushing our money down the toilet. Good for W. for demanding liberty as a precondition.
12 posted on 03/22/2002 9:55:19 AM PST by Hobsonphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
Stored and archived for future use AB.
Thanks.
13 posted on 03/22/2002 9:56:20 AM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: liberalism=failure
if they want a world free of terrorism, they will need to pay for it.

This statement is true, in a way. Ships, planes, bombs, bullets and most of all the proper training of Soldiers cost money. Done right, they cost lots of money. But that is money very well spent if they are properly used to terminate terrorists.

AB

14 posted on 03/22/2002 9:58:38 AM PST by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberalism=failure
The UN 3rd World Mafia looks to want to extort some money.
15 posted on 03/22/2002 10:02:32 AM PST by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: liberalism=failure
Where to begin. For example, just the tone of extortion or Castro's comments that it isn't fair to link the aid to battling corruption. I'll just leave it at "F you Kofi et al. Go back to your limos and ignore the slavery trade in the Sudan"
17 posted on 03/22/2002 10:04:16 AM PST by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Warren
Re your # 6

Chirac is a slithering weasel....heading a pathetic nation of shopkeepers who will do anything for money.

They killed off their nobility and their brains in the revolution and since then have deteriorated into a quarrelsome cesspool of socialism, pathetically jealous of the Amercian standard of living.

Let them eat cake!!!

18 posted on 03/22/2002 10:06:05 AM PST by rmvh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: liberalism=failure
Leaders of poor nations warned their rich counterparts that if they want a world free of terrorism, they will need to pay for it. Leaders of rich nations – including President Bush – said Friday they need to see results if they are to give more money.

Let's see, how much would it cost to be totally free of terrorism. (calculating) (PING) Oh, that's not much. Hey we can neutron bomb all the poor countries for less than one years worth of foreign aid and they will NEVER come back trying to blackmail us and we get to keep the resources!

I think we should give them what they want. After giving them two weeks to make their peace with God or decide that maybe they were wrong in the first place, of course. (I'm not totally anti-foreigner after all)

God Save America (Please)

19 posted on 03/22/2002 10:06:59 AM PST by John O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
Your # 9 says it all.
20 posted on 03/22/2002 10:09:10 AM PST by rmvh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson