Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

89 are indicted in online porn case
The Dallas Morning News ^ | March 19, 2002 | By MICHELLE MITTELSTADT / The Dallas Morning News

Posted on 03/19/2002 12:13:48 PM PST by MeekOneGOP


89 are indicted in online porn case

East Texas man accused of setting up Web site; 7 other Texans indicted

03/19/2002

By MICHELLE MITTELSTADT / The Dallas Morning News

WASHINGTON - Clergy members, Little League coaches and a teacher's aide are among the 89 people charged with participating in an Internet site where hard-core child pornography was traded, federal authorities said Monday.

Forty arrests in 20 states had been made as of Monday, among them that of an East Texas man alleged to have set up the "Candyman" site visited by more than 7,000 people until its shutdown last year during an investigation initiated by the Houston FBI office. Fifty more arrests will occur this week, said Bruce Gebhardt, an FBI executive assistant director.

Video

"It is clear that a new marketplace for child pornography has emerged in the dark corners of cyberspace," Attorney General John Ashcroft told a news conference at FBI headquarters. However, he said, the arrests prove "there will be no free rides on the Internet for traffickers of child pornography."

The man alleged to have set up the "Candyman" e-group in December 2000 Mark Bates, a 32-year-old from Palestine made an initial appearance Monday in federal court in Tyler, federal authorities said. He is among eight people charged in a 10-count federal indictment unsealed Monday in Houston.

Also indicted were seven Texans alleged to have subscribed to the site: Walter Eugene Fitzpatrick, 61, of Liverpool; Robert Froman, 49, of Pasadena; Stephen Michael Johnston, 21, of College Station; Hector Ezeta, 38, of Houston; Jayson Anderson, 28, of Baytown; Billy Loyd White, 45, of Channelview; and Christopher James Tinney, 20, of Katy.

All eight in the Houston indictment were charged with a single count of conspiracy to knowingly transport, receive and distribute child porn by computer, which carries a maximum 15 years' imprisonment and $250,000 fine. Mr. Bates alone was charged with a single count of knowingly transporting child porn by computer, while the seven others were each charged with one count of receiving child porn by computer all of which carry a maximum 15-year prison sentence and $250,000 fine. And the seven were also each charged with a single count of possession of materials containing images of child pornography, which carries a maximum five-year sentence and $250,000 fine.

The Houston indictment alleges that Candyman subscribers were polled on questions such as whether they wanted to see more pornographic images of boys or girls; the age at which they first began abusing children; and the number of children they had molested.

Twenty-seven of those arrested to date have admitted molesting more than 36 children, the FBI said.

Operation Candyman was initiated 14 months ago, after an FBI agent in Houston identified three e-groups involved in posting and exchanging child pornography, the FBI said. FBI officials in Washington declined to provide particulars of the arrests, though they said two Catholic priests as well as several law-enforcement personnel were among those charged.

Investigators examined the 7,000 Candyman subscribers, which included 2,400 people living outside the United States, and prioritized which ones to investigate further, Mr. Gebhardt said.

E-mail: mmittelstadt@dallasnews.com


Online at: http://www.dallasnews.com/latestnews/stories/031902dnnatporncrackdown.7abe7.html


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: candyman; clergymen; fbi; houston; internet; johnashcroft; lilleaguecoaches
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: buffyt
This whole deal is just mind boggling! Hard to believe there are so many involved! Cannot understand what would make someone do that!
61 posted on 03/19/2002 4:29:59 PM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Heh here is a little story that will frost your nads: I run a store which sells games like D&D, Warhammer, Pokemon, and Magic the Gathering. I have lots of youngsters in more store raning in ages from 5 uo to 80 (hey some of us Adults are just big kids at heart when it comes to games and toys) anyhow because of the varied ages of the Kids when the Conversation becomes "rough" by the older kids and I have youngsters in the store I caution the Older guys to cool it on the Bad Words (cussing does not offend me but six year olds do not need to hear the "F"-word repeatedly)

Anyhow one older kid kept up with the harsh Language after several warnings, finally I had enough and warned him next offense and he was banned from my store forever (And when I say forever I ain't kidding)well of course someone made him mad he used the "F"-word and I of course showed him the door...

Now it is amazing how fast Parents want to get involved when they think their Child is being denied his Rights (sic) (this is a whole other story I will not relate here) anyhow when I patiently explained the whole story to the father he basically realized there was no way his kid was coming back and left right after using a few of the "harshest" words himself and in front of youngsters... I thought the matter settled...

Within a few days suddenly I am getting nearly 100 XXX Rated e-mails a day and I mean some of the raunchiest stuff I have ever seen... Beastiality, Gay, Defecation, etc. all of it advertisement...

I do the Unsuscribe deal and seem to get rid of most of it then all of the sudden I am spammed by some seriously disgusting Kiddie porn crap and I immediately call my ISP to get it stopped they did their best but I had to resort to changing my e-mail... I told them I wanted action on the matter and finally they figured out that my little buddy who I kicked out of the store was responsible for the mess he even hacked into my e-mail account (I guess at the time it was way to easy with my Isps e-mail server to hack it) I told em lets nail this little butthole and they told me they wouldn't because he was underage... I said fine I was contacting the local sheriff...

well when the Sheriff got back to me he said strangely the ISP had lost all the info on the incident...

I wonder if it had anything to do with this little butthole's Dad being a prominent Banker-type in our local community???

I guess what is ever best for the children ehh?

People like this guy just makes me ill! First try and force someone to put up with his unruly Kid because he has "rights" (sic) and secondly when the kid has clearly broken the law he uses his connections to make the matter disappear...

62 posted on 03/19/2002 4:34:31 PM PST by Mad Dawgg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
It is despicable. Interesting that all the names so far are male. Why is that gender so prone to this? I think it is a question that needs looking at and answered. That is not to say that women don't do sick stuff sometimes.
63 posted on 03/19/2002 4:41:32 PM PST by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Aliska
You are so right -- wonder why it is almost exclusively men involved?
64 posted on 03/19/2002 4:58:34 PM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Yeah, maybe Eve wasn't such a bad apple after all.

Maybe it's not healthy to look into the deep caverns of male psychology, at least the sickest ones, but there has to be a reason that men are more prone to porn than women.

I'm most concerned about the children who have been exploited by this carnage of child porn. And I am heartened that there are still some decent people who are speaking out. Sometimes you wonder if there are any decent people left in this world.

65 posted on 03/19/2002 5:06:59 PM PST by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
Your first mistake was in trying to "unsubscribe" to the pornspams you received. This ass obviously subscribed you to a bunch of mailing lists (how did he get your email address, by the way)?

There is no such thing as "unsubscribing" from spam. All the spammer will do when you submit your request or even reply to the spam is confirm that your email address is a "live" one then sell it to other spammers, ensuring that you will receive even more spam.

In your case, about the only way to reduce the amount of spam you get is to go after the mailing lists that don't verify subscription requests. To do it the hard way, learn to read email headers and complain about each and every spam you get to the originating ISP and/or their upstream. An easier way is to simply forward these spam emails to your ISP (with full headers) and let them help clean up the mess.

66 posted on 03/19/2002 5:10:24 PM PST by strela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Aliska
Sometimes you wonder if there are any decent people left in this world.

I know exactly what you mean. It has bothered me on here that only a few of us that have posted on these threads seem to be upset by this activity. I just don't get it!

67 posted on 03/19/2002 5:23:04 PM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
My gosh! There's the problem. The parent not only didn't care enough to teach the kid to do the right thing.
The parent didn't care about right and wrong himself. Some example he's setting, huh?
What a pain in the behind to have to put up folks like that, huh? If there were more folks like you in this world,
there'd be a LOT fewer folks like them! ! Thanks for sharing that...........
68 posted on 03/19/2002 5:26:34 PM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Godel
God you're stupid. If you made each picture one count, then people with 10 pictures will wind up in prison longer than someone like Westerfield who actually kidnaps, rapes, and murders a child.

I'll return the compliment: you're an idiot.

So what if they're charged with more than one count? Why is it any skin off your nose? Why are you defending pedophiles? Identify with them, perhaps? (Remember, you started the flame war when you called me "stupid," so I'm sure you can take it.)

It's mere slothfulness on the part of the prosecutor--the prosecutor charges the slime with one count, embarasses the pedophile by publishing his name, then plea bargains the charge down from a felony to a misdemeanor, a little jail time (if any), a little fine, maybe a year or so probation--all worked out in the back room, no harm, no foul--and after they're off paper, they're back in business.

69 posted on 03/19/2002 5:52:14 PM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
That is disgusting! What a horrible example of a parent!

The Bush group on Yahoo during the the campaign was spammed by gay porn which was really sick -- think about opening an email with the heading of picture of GW and Laura and getting two guys -- still gives me the creeps. We complained to Yahoo, they did nothing but I complained to AOL as a subscriber and they sprang into action to investigate and after a short time we had no more problems.

Now I find out that this porn group was on Yahoo who refused to do anything to get rid of the gay porn our group was getting sent during the election -- really made me wonder!

70 posted on 03/19/2002 6:06:36 PM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
It's like some or lots of people, especially men, but lots of women nowadays too, either never had or killed their consciences.

These perps don't seem plagued with any quilt or remorse or anything else but satisfying their abnormal lust. The only thing that bothers them is getting found out, and that only to the extent . . .

Yes, that's part of it. People don't have consciences any more to a great extent. It must have happened while they were growing up somehow.

Was it always this way? Do I have a naive view of the past where people only very rarely gave in to such abnormal desires?

71 posted on 03/19/2002 8:34:32 PM PST by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

Comment #72 Removed by Moderator

To: Godel
God you're stupid. If you made each picture one count, then people with 10 pictures will wind up in prison longer than someone like Westerfield who actually kidnaps, rapes, and murders a child.

I can understand your outrage but mindless comments like yours are just ridiculous. It's supposed to be a justice system where people are punished according to the severity of their crime.

Interesting, about the mindless comments ..I must have missed the trial and conviction of Westerfield, I thought in this country he was innocent untill proven guilty in a court of law...

73 posted on 03/19/2002 8:47:23 PM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Throw the book at them...but make sure they're dead first so it won't hurt when it hits them.
74 posted on 03/19/2002 8:51:44 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: strela; Mad Dawg
I get porn spam all the time. Just delete it. Don't know how they harvested my email address. I did visit one porn site early on to inform myself what was going on. Never figured it out . . . and couldn't get into the site without signing up . . . which I didn't . . . but they find you out. I just ignore it.
75 posted on 03/19/2002 8:52:57 PM PST by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: kidao35
I guess you were hoping that the 9/11 attacks meant a get-out-of-jail-free card for all other kinds of perps.

No, and I think it's clear my opinion of this filth from other posts. However, especially now, we have limited federal resources, limited numbers of law enforcement officers and they have a pretty full plate. As destructive as kiddie porn is, it is far more vital to track down the terrorists before we worry about the kiddie porn, especially people just "using" it, not the producers. If this was a ring of actual kiddie porn producers, I'd say go for it. As it sounds now, it sounds like misallocated resources.

Have whatever reaction you want - call me names, make implications. I'm a pragmatist, and so are most cops and feds. You're the only cop in a one cop town, and there's a guy on one side of the street smoking a joint, and one commiting rape on the other, you're going to bust the rapist and ignore the potsmoker - for now anyway.

Others on this thread seem to be waiting with baited breath for some kind of crackdown on all "porn" - I assume everything from Playboy to Debbie Does Dallas falls under that. If Ashcroft (who I voted for twice for Governor and Senator in Missouri and supported as AG) goes after the California porn industry (as that Frontline seemed to suggest) me and a whole lot of other former supporters are going to bail on him. Incredible that it's even being discussed while the nation is at war and possibly rotten with foreign agents. My guess is that it's not being discussed anymore.

While not porn "user", it's protected by the first amendment and the stuff that violates local standards of decency is to be prosecuted on the local level. The Feds have no business getting involved in that issue.

Interesting that no one commented on the way they're going after the medicinal pot smokers in CA. I guess some things are too repellent even for this crowd to support.

76 posted on 03/19/2002 8:57:38 PM PST by motexva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: strela
"(how did he get your email address, by the way)?"

At the time I ran Magic TOurnaments and Had A Website on which I posted the Results, also had one of those little Bulletin Boards, and also listed product to sell (before I went exclusively to e-bay) anyhow I had my e-mail address listed on the website. Most of the players would e-maill me prior to the tournaments to secure a slot it seemed to work fine (this was about 4 maybe 5 years ago BTW) but I had to change everything and shut down the B-board... the little freak would spam the board with some fairly disgusting language and suggestions as well.

BTW I am not with that ISP any longer and the little butthole ended up getting busted some drug stuff and actually served some time (wow there is a shocker) of course now he is getting some kind of college courses provided by the government... doesn't it feel good to know your tax dollars are going to such a worthy cause... :-p

77 posted on 03/20/2002 3:13:54 AM PST by Mad Dawgg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: constitutiongirl
Do you mean that there is still a chance we will rewarded and find slimeball ex-president klintons name on the list?

Oh well I can dream can't I

78 posted on 03/20/2002 3:18:18 AM PST by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Aliska
I get porn spam all the time. Just delete it.

Sorry, but tolerance of theft is not an option for me. I delete the spammer's Internet account instead.

79 posted on 03/20/2002 4:17:11 AM PST by strela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Thorn11cav
Nothing serious is going to happen to these perverts. Remember how many Catholic Priests are being brought up on these same charges... Members of the clergy, like those pedophiles who delight in child pornography, usually get off with a slap on the wrist. The usual pattern was to ship the member of the clergy (and it's not just limited to the Catholic Church) off to a new church with no mention of their prior child sexual assault. Only now--and after much public outcry--are some members of the clergy being held accountable for their actions.

I know the legal scenario all to well. The first thing the pedophiles are going to do is to get lawyered up, then they'll start their "he's a respected member of the community" tapdance to make sure their guy isn't punished in any meaningful way.

80 posted on 03/20/2002 4:22:51 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson