Posted on 02/01/2002 6:37:14 PM PST by BP2
Christian woman to be stoned to death
By UWE SIEMON-NETTO, UPI Religion Correspondent
WASHINGTON, Feb. 1 (UPI) -- Human Rights Watch appealed to Sudanese President Omar Hassan Bashir on Friday to intervene on behalf of a young pregnant Christian woman sentenced to death by stoning for adultery.
The New York-based organization asked Bashir "to prevent this cruel and inhuman punishment from being exercised against her." The accused is Abok Alfa Akok, an 18-year-old Dinka tribeswoman from southern Darfur in western Sudan.
According to HRW spokeswoman Jemera Rone, information available about this case is spotty. However, in its letter to Bashir, HRW stressed, "The man with whom (the woman) allegedly had sex was not tried, because the court lacked sufficient evidence to prosecute him."
The trial was conducted in a criminal court -- not a religious tribunal -- in the city of Nyala. As HRW pointed out to Sudan's soldier-president, Abok Alfa Akok "did not have legal representation during the trial."
"The trial was conducted in Arabic, which is not her language, and there was no translation of the proceedings in order to ensure that she understood fully the case against her."
Faith O'Donnell, coordinator of the Church Alliance for a New Sudan, reminded the Khartoum government that it had promised to change its ways after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on New York and Washington.
"We expect them to rethink their position in this present case," she told United Press International on Friday. She added, "We understand that the sexual act this young woman is charged with was coerced." The case is now on appeal.
According to HRW, "The Sudanese government has in the past claimed that its Shari'a (religious) laws would not be applied to Christians, but this case shows otherwise. The sentence was based on Article 146 of Sudan's 1991 Penal Code, which is based upon the government's interpretation of the Shari'a."
This article, HRW went on, stipulates that adultery should be punished with:
"1. Execution by stoning when the offender is married; one hundred lashes (when) the offender is not married."
While reiterating its opposition to capital punishment, Human Rights Watch stated in its letter to Bashir, "Stoning to death is additionally painful and brutal."
Under the Shari'a, the stones thrown during the execution should not be so large that the offender dies after a few strikes. Neither should they be as small as pebbles and fail to cause serious injury.
Executions by stoning are not mentioned in the Koran, Islamic legal scholar Tarik Abdul-Rahman wrote, but they are part of the Hadith (collections of sayings and acts of Mohammed). As Abul-Rahman has pointed out, this punishment goes back to the Pentateuch, or first five books of Hebrew Scripture.
In radical Muslim countries, stoning has experienced a major comeback in recent years. "Since the inception of the mullahs' rule, hundreds of women of various ages have been and continued to be stoned to death throughout Iran," the National Council of Resistance of Iran claimed.
One recent such execution was described in vivid detail by local newspapers: Maryam Ayoubi, a 38-year-old mother of three, was convicted of adultery and being her lover's accomplice in her husband's death.
The execution occurred on July 11, 2001. According to Iranian press reports, she was first flogged 50 times, then given a ritual bath, wrapped in a white shroud and carried to the execution site on a stretcher.
There she was buried up to her armpits and subsequently bombarded with rocks. Her lover was hanged.
Human rights activists charge that male adulterers often fare much better than women in strict Islamic countries. In the northern Nigerian state of Sokoto, a woman sentenced to be stoned to death is awaiting the outcome of her appeal in her blind father's small hut.
The only evidence against Safiyatu Huseini had been her pregnancy. The father of her child was an older man, already twice married. She claims he had raped her. But the same court that sentenced her acquitted him after two months on death row.
In some countries, the stoning of women is a welcome popular entertainment. When a lesbian couple was sentenced to die last year in Somalia's autonomous region of Puntland, several hundred people "cheered as the judge handed down death sentences on the two women," according to a BBC report.
Islamic legal scholar Abdul-Rahman confirmed that the Prophet Mohammed personally prescribed death by stoning for married men and women indulging in illicit sex.
Abdul-Rahman added, however, that the death sentence could only be passed if some strict criteria had been fulfilled: "The act must have been publically witnessed by four pious people ... The person must be sane and not under the influence of alcohol."
Moreover, the scholar stressed, "Nobody is allowed to spy or invade your private space. The prophet has said that if anyone peeps into your house, you are allowed to poke out his eye."
Lol... and in many different forms, my good doctor!
I'm an atheist, why would I defend a nutball religion like Islam?
As a conservative, you may be the exception, but I suspect that it wasn't the spreading of atheism that resulted in so much murder. It was the spreading of the State as God - something many misinterpret as atheism. All too often, many "atheists" are the most extreme religious zealots that exist. Their religion is either Anti-Christian or Pro-State, not a mere lack of belief. Most self proclaimed "atheists" are certainly not void of religion - they are just too stupid and misguided to realize it.
In what way? He was out like three days -- more like a good sleep or a mini-coma. Not much of a big deal in an INFINITE friking lifetime!
Yes, your religionist argument there is so brilliant.
Similar but different. Both nutball at the core though.
Nice kneejerk reaction there Mr. Rational One. I was actually absolving Senator Pardek of my charge against the majority of atheists, and in my comments suggested that "Atheist Conservatives" or even libertarians may fit the gist of my argument much less than "Atheist Liberals."
You apparently did not read my entire argument and thus upon reading the conclusion, drew instant, unnecessary offense. Or were you offended because you actually are one of those that worship the state or feel it necessary to prove your atheism by arrogantly attacking or mocking those with a religous conviction?
FYI, I am agnostic. I don't "feel" God, but I am not so arrogant to believe that I can "know" He doesn't exist.
Regarding my post #53, the answer to my question has already been made clear. I should amend my original comments to include the word "arrogant" along with "stupid" I guess.
You know what? Religionists have been trying to put atheists to death for so long that I really don't give a rip if they feel their religion is being mocked. They certainly have never considered my feelings when they get up in their pulpits and condemn me to infinite hell. So scr*w 'em.
You have falsifiable evidence to the contrary?
Undeadly death. Yeah right. Religion is a parody of itself. You come up with nonsensical things like non-death dying. When religionists get pinned down to explain what the heck you are talking about they simply assert that mere mortals can't understand the workings of the divine. So their explanations are laughable -- have no meaning by their own admission.
You said Christ died -- like that was some huge sacrifice -- but he isn't dead, is he. So what exactly was the sacrifice -- this non-death death.
In an infinite lifespan a billion years has no meaning, three days barely has meaning in a human lifespan. Get real. That was no sacrifice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.