Posted on 01/26/2002 9:02:04 AM PST by umbra
Senator Jesse Helms (Republican-NC) 'has steadfastly avoided taking sides' in past GOP primaries, but he 'is about to bend his rule some--if not outright break it.'
Helms is scheduled to address CPAC on 1/31, and he 'has invited Elizabeth Dole to introduce him.'
Helms apparently plans to 'lavish her with praise.'
Helm's spokesman Jimmy Broughton 'wouldn't say whether Helms plans to endorse Dole, suggesting: 'Stay Tuned.'
One of Dole's GOP rivals, atty Jim Snyder,: "All this pomp and circumstance is to expected for someone who's been in Washington for so long.'
BUMP!
again!
And you trust her? What makes you think she isn't just a liberal in reality - who will quit pretending being anything else the day after elected?
I'd rather have a flaming liberal for one term - who won't be able to get anywhere with Bush - than another McCain who will hold the GOP hostage with constant threats to defect.
sneakypete,
I agree, and because of such, the NC-GOP and RNC will offend many of the TRUE North Carolinians who KNOW and LIVE the problems of the people of this state day after day.
Dolt has no concept of what effect a plant closing in NC has on OUR families. Yet these goons keep hammering "Globalism" while they shatter our society with each tap. What will she do? Absolutely nothing but "play dead" with the rest of the act. The way RNC and NC-GOP can reach the conservative Dems - and we will certainly need their help to hold Helms seat - is to ALIGN and ACCENT a Repub candidate's association with/to the average voter's concerns. Dolt HAS NO ABILITY TO BE THIS ONE. For the RNC/NC-GOP to endorse her instead of polishing a genuine North Carolinian candidate proves just how far from truly representing the people these parties have gone, and from what I hear, only serves to fuel and enforce the Conservative Democrats' (CD's) long held view of not being able to associate with the Republican party. We Republicans had best face the music - a Republican won't be returning to Washington if the candidate can't appeal to the average CD voter of NC....
Az
Why do you think voting for a socialist liberal republican is going to slow anything down?
If the republicans cannot find a suitable conservative candidate , I too say go third party. It make no difference if we get a democrat social liberal or another republican social liberal like Jaffords. Your just wasting your vote.
First off,I am no longer a Republican. I resigned my party position,and am now a registered Independent. The Bush-Bots here on FR kept telling me that "you are not a TRUE Republican!",and the more I thought about it,the more I agreed with them. I refuse to join the cult of Bush merely because there is a "silent D" behind his name that is overwritten by a "R".
Secondly,the RNC and NC-GOP don't give a single DAMN about what is happening in NC. They are both entirely focused on the federal level. Giddy is a perfect example of this. She hasn't lived in NC since she was a puppy,and has never had a REAL job in her entire life. Every job she has ever had was the top slot,and she got them by sleeping with the right man. She IS a Republican version of Buh-Bette!.
As for her suddenly "discovering her conservative roots" goes,this is pure HorseHillary. The only roots she will ever find are gray ones when she needs to touch-up her dye job. She will JUMP at the first opportunity to join in with the Dims on things like gun control or gun bans,and will excuse this by saying something like "I think this is a reasonable compromise that doesn't really affect the rights of NC citizens to own guns. They can still own guns,but not all guns. In return,I got my beloved friends in the Dim party to agree to vote with us on a tax cut some time in the future. BTW,have you met my new collegue,Hillary? She's my idol!".
Sure, there's other people I'd rather have in there than Liddy, but the minute she decided to run, she became the Republican nominee. To all of you who insist she'll turn into Snowe on steroids, I guess we can only wait and see. I really don't think that's gonna happen, but we'll have to wait a year at the very least to find out.
BTW, I think she'll serve 2 terms. She'd be 78 after two terms, which isn't unreasonable at all considering how old many Senators are when they retire or die nowadays.
Ahhh, if only we could get Michelle to run instead of Giddy! A genuine intellect who REALLY is conservative.
Assault weapons should be banned, she argued, noting, correctly, that "you don't need an AK-47 to defend your family".
Sort of a little double speak here.
What does she mean by studied further?
"you don't need an AK-47 to defend your family"
But you may need one to defend your country.
Not me. If I'm going to vote for a statist,I'm going to vote for one who is honest about it.
The thought of a Democrapic sweep is too much to bear!
It MIGHT be the wake-up call the Republicans so desperately need to hear. Even though the "leadership"(gag.puke) are leftists themselves,the thing they worship most of all is power. If they are ever forced to face up to the reality that they never reached majority status UNTIL Newt somehow managed to convince them to run AND legislate to the right,they deserve to have their asses handed to them on election day. Newt brought the party to power,and these insider bastards stabbed him in the back with a knife over a blow job.Or at least that is the excuse they needed. I'm becoming more and more convinced the real reason is they hate conservatives,and needed Newt out of them before he ruined it for leftists like themselves.
Don't confuse religious bigotry/morality with being a "conservative". They are not only different things,they are oppossing forces.
After he attacked Robert J. Dole as a "tax-collector for the welfare state,"
Correct in every detail. Dolt WAS a Dim who only ran as a Republican becuase that was the only way he could get elected.
grich himself voted time and time again for the expansion of that same welfare state.
Examples,please. Examples IN CONTEXT.
evil way that Gingrich attacked Pat Buchanan in the 1996 primaries, he split his britches with me.
Maybe for you,but most of us saw Pat as being a monkey wrench on a ego trip to enrich himself. I see no evidence to make me change my mind about this. Pat DESERVED to be attacked for the isolationist idiot he is.
ust say, he does a good job in his occasional Fox News commentaries. It's too bad he didn't follow that commentary line when he was Speaker.
He did. His problem was the left wing of the DimRep party were busy stabbing him in the back.
was out trying to convert Katie Couric and other liberals to his new liberal brand of Republicanism.
You shouldn't post while drunk.
and Newt, still unable to settle on one woman, is mostly forgotten.
Here we go. The biggest problem you have with him is based on this,and nothing else. You are mad because he got a blow job. It's people like you who are responsible for Clinton getting away with the REAL crimes he committed while president,because you focused on and demanded the Republican Party focus on the blow jobs. This gave the Dims the cover they needed to scream "It's all about sex!".
Giddy already wears pants. Big deal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.