Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/18/2002 12:34:58 AM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sarcasm
This will most probably be dismissed as junk science by the global warming cabal.
2 posted on 01/18/2002 12:39:51 AM PST by set the record straight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
Saw an info babe on CNN Headline News the other day and she slyly referred to the information as meaning the earth is NOT warming!!! Her comment warmed the cockles of my heart!!!

Hope she isn't immediately relocated to some remote outpost at CNN!!! Be really really nice if she took the place of Judy Woofwoof, IMO!!!

4 posted on 01/18/2002 3:40:19 AM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
From Still Waiting for Greenhouse

Antarctic Cooling in a `Warming' World (15 Jan 2002)

A new paper in Nature by no less than 13 authors has been reported widely in the world's media. It begins - " Climate models generally predict amplified warming in polar regions". This is the one consistent feature of all the climate models and of the basic theory about greenhouse warming itself - the polar regions take the brunt of the warming. However, on the ground, that has not been happening. Instead of warming, the Antarctic continent has been cooling over the last 35 years in complete defiance of what the theory says should happen. The authors continue - " our spatial analysis of Antarctic meteorological data demonstrates a net cooling on the Antarctic continent between 1966 and 2000, particularly during summer and autumn. The McMurdo Dry Valleys have cooled by 0.7 °C per decade between 1986 and 2000, with similar pronounced seasonal trends."

None of this is news to the climatological community as the weather station records from the Antarctic continent have been readily available to anyone. (This website has temperature graphs from many such stations in the `What the Stations Say' page). What is new is that it is only now that the general public are being informed via the journals and the media. The IPCC and the environmentalists have for years kept the public focus only on a tiny area of the Antarctic, the Antarctic Peninsula, a mere 2% of the total area of the continent. That little area has been warming, mainly due to its interaction with the Southern Ocean, but the other massive 98% of the continent has been cooling, something the greenhouse industry has carefully ignored. Now it has been finally made public via Nature and the media outlets which quickly picked up the story.

One consequence of this cooling has been loss of biological productivity, with soil invertebrates declining by 10% annually. The authors of the paper then laid down a challenge to the climate models which predict polar warming, not the cooling we have actually had - " Continental Antarctic cooling, especially the seasonality of cooling, poses challenges to models of climate and ecosystem change."

The greenhouse modellers have a lot of explaining to do before they can expect whole societies to undergo an economically impoverishing culture shift in deference to a theory which is so patently wrong on one of its key pillars.

6 posted on 01/18/2002 3:50:16 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
"Perhaps, after 10,000 years of retreat from the ice-age maximum, researchers turned on their instruments just in time to catch the stabilization or readvance of the ice sheet," Richard Alley of Pennsylvania State University wrote in a commentary accompanying the Science paper.

I have experience with Mr. Alley - he's a rabid liberal. I'd be curious to read the remainder of his commentary, as this sounds supportive of the study's findings.

10 posted on 01/18/2002 4:06:01 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
AAAAAAaaahhhhhhgh! The Ice Age is coming, the Ice Age is coming!!! We better spend billions of tax dollars to do studies to back up legislation with which to punish industries and impose steep fines, draining billions from the economy.

More SUVs, more styrofoam containers, better refrigerant, we have to reverse what we were told to do in yesterday's fearfest - quickly, there's no time to waste. Panic in the other direction everybody, PANIC!

12 posted on 01/18/2002 4:14:51 AM PST by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
This is not good news. Since I live in the northeast I am on record as being enthusiasticly in favor of global warming. I think the government should do all in it's power to support global warming. We must redouble our efforts. Write your congresscritter. Buy an SUV. Do something!! I freezing up here!!!
13 posted on 01/18/2002 4:27:30 AM PST by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
"The cooling defies a trend spanning more than 100 years in which average land surface temperatures have increased worldwide by about 1 degree Fahrenheit. The scientists said Antarctica is the only continent that is cooling. They could not say why."

Maybe because the supposed warming trend everywhere else is a statistical artifact. Urban areas are warmer than rural areas; this is a known fact, and doesn't represent anything more sinister than the thermal mass of acres and acres of paved blacktop roads and black tarpaper roofs. Most temperature monitoring stations are in urban areas, for all the obvious reasons. So, not surprisingly, as urbanization has increased over the past 100 years, so have average recorded temperatures.

Even monitoring the same station over time won't work, as once-rural stations become urbanized, and other stations once in small urban areas become further and further from the edge of the heat island. To get accurate readings, you have to look at temperature records from measuring stations far away from any growing urban areas. Antarctica is the only continent where such stations exist in any quantity, and lo, Antarctica is the only continent where there's a cooling trend rather than a warming one. Imagine that.

18 posted on 01/18/2002 6:20:27 AM PST by Fabozz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
bump
21 posted on 01/18/2002 2:45:04 PM PST by NorseWood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kyoto_list; *Global Warming hoax
Bumpin'.
22 posted on 01/18/2002 10:35:55 PM PST by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
Question for the FReeper Science Academy: Where are we in the 22 year solar cycle?

This is bad news for the Global Warming Cultists. I am stunned that this study was published. I don't know how the truth slipped through. The Enviro-Nazis are slipping, they usually have better control over the media than this.

23 posted on 01/28/2002 5:45:05 PM PST by Kermit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson