Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Media Bias Headed for the Ash Heap of History?
TownHall.com ^ | Thursday, January 3, 2002 | by Mark Tapscott

Posted on 01/03/2002 12:36:48 AM PST by JohnHuang2

TownHall.com: Conservative Columnists: Mark Tapscott
QUICK LINKS: HOME | NEWS | OPINION | RIGHTPAGES | CHAT | WHAT'S NEW

townhall.com

Mark Tapscott (back to story)

January 3, 2002

Is Media Bias Headed for the Ash Heap of History?

What do the fall of the Berlin Wall, demise of the Soviet Union, election of a GOP Congress and President Bush’s decision to pull the United States out of the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty have in common? For years for most conservatives, those four milestones were simply unthinkable. “I never expected that to happen in my lifetime” was often heard in our excited discussions of the latest incredible news about the Wall coming down or the Soviet tanks withdrawing from Eastern Europe or Newt Gingrich becoming Speaker of the House.

Something else just as unthinkable may be coming, as evidenced by former CBS News reporter Bernard Goldberg’s instant New York Times best-seller, “Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News.”

By itself, Goldberg’s fascinating book might not mean much beyond a season of frequently heated interviews of its author by former colleagues and perhaps a bit of fleeting newsroom soul-searching. Viewed in conjunction with recent events and trends, however, Bias could be another sign of a revolution that is reshaping America’s newscape. Put another way, the end of the Liberal Media Establishment could be right around the corner.

Consider these three reasons. First, the networks are leaking viewers like the Titanic, post-collision. In 1980, three of every four adult Americans tuned into the evening network news programs of CBS, NBC and ABC.

Today, a mere 43 percent of evening viewers watch a network newscast. In the private sector, an executive who loses a third of his company’s customers is soon unemployed. Just ask Roger Smith, once at the helm of General Motors.

Unlike 1980, viewers now have alternatives. In classic free market economics fashion, the growing demand for news information has created thriving markets for new methods of delivery.

First CNN and more recently Fox News have captured huge audiences that aren’t likely to switch back to the networks anytime soon. Among younger people, Internet news sources are a growing factor.

But wait, there’s more! Millions of Americans also now get much of their public policy news from the hundreds of talk radio shows like those of Rush Limbaugh and Dr. Laura Schlesinger. Broadcast news has also lost audience to specialized media like all-news radio, newsletters and the countless publications put out by non-profit advocacy groups.

As Goldberg so aptly puts it: “Today there are cable and satellite TV and the Internet, competition that Cronkite and Huntley and Brinkley didn’t even have to think about.”

The second factor that could soon help bring about the end of network news bias is the impact of Sept. 11 on Americans’ expectations of the news media. In the first few days following the terrible events of that day, the network news operations returned to the basics of journalism, generally reporting the facts as quickly and as accurately as possible.

As a result, millions of people rediscovered the utility and importance of hard news. The question now is how many of these returning viewers will the networks retain. Already, there are signs of the slide back into commercialized sensationalism and celebrity features, seasoned with generous helpings of liberally biased “news.” Business-as-usual reporting will spur a return to falling ratings.

Now along comes the third factor, the Goldberg book. Initial demand is so great that publisher Al Regnery has added 120,000 copies to the first printing of 80,000. Sales should remain strong because Bias is well-written, liberally sprinkled with juicy tidbits about media luminaries and quite persuasive, thanks to Goldberg’ s insider status.

Sooner or later, falling ratings and economic necessity will force a network news executive to mandate the Fox formula, the “we report, you decide” approach that stresses fairness and accuracy. When that network’s ratings turn around, how long do you think it will take the other two broadcast giants to follow suit?

Then conservatives everywhere will be saying “wow, I never thought I’d see the day when I liked the way Dan Rather reports the news.” And it could happen much sooner than any of us think.

Mark Tapscott is Director of the Center for Media and Public Policy at The Heritage Foundation, a TownHall.com member group. Contact Mark Tapscott

©2001 The Heritage Foundation

townhall.com

QUICK LINKS: HOME | NEWS | OPINION | RIGHTPAGES | CHAT | WHAT'S NEW


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Quote of the Day by SkyPilot
1 posted on 01/03/2002 12:36:48 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Is Media Bias Headed for the Ash Heap of History?

----------------

Not likely with the left wing students graduating out of left wing journalism departments. That's where the problem is, and it's a subsidized problem immune from market forces. Were I given a billion dollars and asked to start a national TV network, the biggest problem would be finding people suitable to staff it.

2 posted on 01/03/2002 12:43:08 AM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Then conservatives everywhere will be saying “wow, I never thought I’d see the day when I liked the way Dan Rather reports the news.” And it could happen much sooner than any of us think.

That means pigs will fly sooner than we think. Ha.

3 posted on 01/03/2002 12:48:47 AM PST by MadEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RLK
You've hit the nail on the head.

Conservatives, by and large, tend to go into business and engineering, whereas most liberals opt for less demanding challenges, such as journalism.

4 posted on 01/03/2002 12:49:32 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
It may happen... though before it does I would expect to see the bolsheviks consuming each other first - this is the first sign of an impending collapse. Come to think of it, it is already happening in that Goldberg has betrayed his former comrades, Jerry Rivers hasn't been seen or heard of for a while and the big media bolsheviks are taking turns sniping at one another. Bolsheviks ALWAYS turn on each other when the machine starts to break down.
5 posted on 01/03/2002 2:01:33 AM PST by waxhaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
You know all those fair and balanced reports on tv news will disappear the minute Bush's poll numbers drop. At this point, it would be ratings suicide to blast him, but 90% approval won't last forever, and the media nudniks will be out with their thousand small knives again in full force.

I get a laugh from local newspersons who try to smile while reporting something good about Bush. Bad actors. It's obvious that they have real problems mouthing complimentary words.

6 posted on 01/03/2002 2:09:05 AM PST by PoisedWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
This guy obviously has no contact with journalism "students." I do. Here are a few of the most memorable quotes from my dealings with the future dans, cokies, peters, toms, and bernies:

"The Constitution wasn't written for me...They kep' people like me fo slaves" (Big surprise--an Ethnic Studies major!)

"If I heard that Bush did coke, I would run the story in a second..." (Not ONE could coherently explain the difference between a rumor and an allegation correctly.)

"What is the point of the electoral college, anyway? Do we really need it anymore?" (This guy wants to write for the New York Times...)

"They went after clinton for nuthin'"

The journalists of the future I have run into are ignorant of history, illiterate, angry, small-minded liberal losers.

Imagine today's journalists with none of the morality of today's media,(what little they have to begin with) no practical knowledge of history or proper English language, and very little work ethic, and you have the media of the 21st century.

7 posted on 01/03/2002 5:46:21 AM PST by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I'm not as optimistic as the writer is. As previous commenters have noted, it's mostly lefties who go into broadcast journalism (yes, we have Brit Hume, John Stossel, and a few others, but not many). However, the rise of FOX provides some competition, and, if FOX broadcast adopts the programming of Fox Cable News, this could really put a nail in the coffin of CBSNBCABC.
8 posted on 01/03/2002 7:26:23 AM PST by white trash redneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RLK
You nailed it, but good!

This columnist is dreamin'.

9 posted on 01/03/2002 12:32:38 PM PST by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RLK
>> Were I given a billion dollars and asked to start a national TV network, the biggest problem would be finding people suitable to staff it. <<

That's because IDIOT CONSERVATIVES like to WHINE about media bias -- instead of ENTERING the arts, acting, writing, music, journalism, academia, etc.

Until conservatives creative a proactive counterculture -- instead of remaining on the defensive with boycotts -- media bias will not end.

10 posted on 01/03/2002 7:05:14 PM PST by Commie Basher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson