[summer]

I have to admit, the NYT seems determined not to encourage Al Gore in any way whatsoever for 2004.

[marajade]

Who do they suggest should be the nominee instead?

[Dan from Michigan]

My money -

ROY BARNES

[OK]

John Edwards of NC seems to be intent on running in 2004. We can only hope that Bush cleans the floor with him enough that he never runs for office again after that.

[Cicero]

I don't know if the Democrat Powers That Be, which certainly include the publisher and editors of the Times, have decided who will get the nod. But they've obviously decided that Gore is a loser, and that this is a good time to show him the door.

[rellimpank]

--Gore is as done as a candidate as Harold Stassen--

[desertcry]

nyt want's hillary, she owns all the liberal media.

[Bubba_Leroy]

Don't listen to them Al! I want you to run.

The only thing that will be more entertaining than watching soreloserman and Hitlary fighting it out in the democRAT primaries is watching whichever one gets the nomination lose big time to GWB in 2004.

[glockmeister40]

I think Gore should be encouraged to run. This way, Bush can kick his a$$ again.

PS: This time it won't be close.

[GretchenEE]

There is a problem with this article.

It is too daggone short!

The real title of this should have been written by the NYT staff as, "DEMS TROLLING FOR VIABLE 2004 CANDIDATE: HELP WANTED!!!!"

[MississippiMan]

I have to admit, the NYT seems determined not to encourage Al Gore in any way whatsoever for 2004.

Of course not. Hillary is their darling for '04 and will be so for each and every liberal media entity. Write it down. We only think we've seen biased media coverage until now. The media will be orgasmic at the thought of her in the White House as President and they will do everything possible to put her there.

MM

[thucydides]

The problem for the democrats is that the outbreak of terrorism restores us to the situation that prevailed during the Cold War, when the voting public came to think that it was unsafe to have a democrat as president. After Johnson, only Carter got elected, and that was by posing as a complete political outsider and a former Navy submarine commander. He proved incompetent in a dangerous world, and was dumped after one term. When the Cold War ended, the nation took a flyer with Clinton, a man who is now suspected of having laid the foundation for 9/11 (witness the frantic spinning efforts of the democrats against this conclusion). After Clinton, the democrats will have a very difficult time convincing Americans to go with a left-leaning liberal. Even democrats are now thanking their lucky stars that their candidate was not elected last year.

[Standing Wolf]

Eat your empty heart out, Liar Gore!

It'll be a snowy Independence day in Miami Beach before I forget the hell you put our nation through, you leftist parasite!

[The Wizard]

Dump Osama bin Dasshole

[Joe Boucher]

Gore? Gore who? Never heard of him. Is he an unemployeed thief?

[scouse]

The Rat ticket for 2004 will be: McCain/Lieberman or vise versa.

[Lancey Howard]

A freeper named blackbag posted this on a malpractice thread about a week ago:

"Keep an eye on John Edwards Senator from NC and wannabe Presendental candidate. He made ALL his money... millions on one Malpractice case."

[GOPJ]

Will the Times be backing a "Clinton" for the job soon? Either a real one, or a sleazy liberal wannabe imitation? Inquiring minds want to know...

I have to admit, the NYT seems determined not to encourage Al Gore in any way whatsoever for 2004.

[nicmarlo]

The name Daschole is being tossed about as a possible runner for president, indeed, they are saying he has been positioning himself for some time for this.

[VRWC For Truth]

Hillary Rodham Hussein / John McLame is the 2004 DemoRAT ticket. You heard it hear first.

[Achilleus66]

Summer, you're awesome with what you post. Big time bump!!!