Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/13/2001 9:48:59 AM PST by expose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
To: expose
some habits die hard dont they Russia?
2 posted on 12/13/2001 9:51:39 AM PST by smith288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expose
WOW!!! A Communist government against private citizens having weapons. Now I've heard EVERYTHING!!
3 posted on 12/13/2001 9:52:28 AM PST by Puppage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expose
Russians still don't get the fact that if only the government has guns, people are controlled by government. When they fully understand our Constitution, they will understand that we, the people, are to have the power(guns) to control government, if such government fails to serve US.
4 posted on 12/13/2001 9:52:59 AM PST by d14truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expose
Oh . . . this makes sense.

Hey, were the Taliban using AR-15s or Kalashnikovs?

6 posted on 12/13/2001 9:54:18 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expose
  1. Do not tell us how to run our country, communists. You nearly ran yours into the ground.

  2. Despite the strictest gun control in the world, when I was in Russia I was offered a Makarov pistol for $50.00 and a full-auto AK-74 for $100.00. RPG-7's were also available for a little more.

  3. Finally, and most important: IF YOU HAVE THE MONEY TO CONTRIBUTE TO ANTI-GUN GROUPS, LOOKS LIKE YOU WON'T NEED ANY OF OUR FINANCIAL AID ANY MORE.

7 posted on 12/13/2001 9:54:57 AM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expose
I find it hard to believe that the government of Russia would have any concern over Americans exercising their constitutional rights. I know this was on the "Voice of Russia" broadcast, but it doesn't necessarily mean that this is the official position of the Russian government. More likely, it was an opinion piece from some foolish liberal college student. Yeah, the Russians have them too.
9 posted on 12/13/2001 9:55:11 AM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expose
NO SHOCK HERE.
10 posted on 12/13/2001 9:55:24 AM PST by NC Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expose
I wish I could have been born 85 years ago so I wouldn't have to live through this crap. I'm only 21 right now, so with increased medical technology and my good health, I'll probably be forced to live through the bulk of the 21st century. Just kill me now.
11 posted on 12/13/2001 9:56:39 AM PST by Operation Infinite Jumble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expose
The blame for increased gun sales, according to Moscow and anti-gun activists, lies with gun manufacturers.

This is the keen understanding of a free market which made the Soviet Union such a rousing success. Excuse me for a moment...I'm getting hungry...damn farmers.

12 posted on 12/13/2001 9:57:56 AM PST by gundog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expose
What's the automatic weapon of choice of every terrorist group in 95% of the world?

Kalishnakov

13 posted on 12/13/2001 10:00:35 AM PST by ZOOKER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expose
When Hitler invaded the USSR in WWII they encountered a largely unarmed population. In addition they were welcomedas liberators. It took the soviets over a year even to recover since "comrade" Stalin had also wiped out 80% of the officer corps of the red army himself.

The only reason the Russians are where they are today is because the fall of the USSR occured because security troops which had the only guns finally decided not to shoot their fellow civilians. The story and history would be quite different had they followed the example of the Chinese at Tienamen Square.

No doubdt about it, an armed population is the only safeguard to tyranny.

I don't think we need advice from a people with such a sorry history and track record.

16 posted on 12/13/2001 10:03:03 AM PST by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expose
Gosh, color me surprised...
17 posted on 12/13/2001 10:03:16 AM PST by Jefferson Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expose; All
Beretta's promise to pay a portion of the sale of each pistol to survivors and relatives of the Sept. 11 attacks was particularly irritating to the gun-control advocates.

Gun-control advocates are peeved that Beretta is capitalizing on the sympathy angle. IOW, they're peeved that Beretta is gaining the hearts of people. And especially that they're doing it in conjunction with increased gun sales... that the customers are buying for reasons more profound than being sympathetic to the survivors -- though that adds to the special-ness of buying a gun -- they buy them for protection so that they too may be a survivor, if push comes to shove. That's must be really unnerving to the gun-control advocates. The combination of common sense and sympathy irritates them.

You see, the control advocates thought they owned the license on jerking around people's emotions and here now Beretta does the equivalent but does it honestly and right in alignment with the market/consumer's emotional and psychological make up. Yep, I bet the gun-grabbers are fuming.

18 posted on 12/13/2001 10:04:18 AM PST by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expose
"Moscow added that "the spread of small arms causes concern in many countries," and referred to a recent conference in the Russian capital linking "global instability with the spread of small arms."" (WorldNetDaily)

Evidently Russia's elites haven't noticed it - but the weapon of choice among terrorists is the Russian-made AK-47, and thus is something that they, not Washington, chose to flood the world with.

Look at any photo or video of bin Laden - and see what kind of rifle stands next to him! Or look at the abundant use of the Kalashnikov in Lebanon's civil war.

Scandals of antigun politicians and activists

22 posted on 12/13/2001 10:07:00 AM PST by glc1173@aol.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expose
Strange, I was looking for Putin's signature on the United States Constitution, and wouldn't you know it, it was nowhere to be found!

Stupid socialists. Go away now little lefities, your incompetence in running your own country is showing.

25 posted on 12/13/2001 10:07:37 AM PST by Lumberjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expose
What a suprise.
26 posted on 12/13/2001 10:07:59 AM PST by mconder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expose
"Due to substantial U.S. pressure, the conference refrained from issuing a global call for "regulation on the ownership of small arms.""

Thank God for the adults in the White House who understand the 2nd Amendment!!

Freedom Is Worth Fighting For !!

The Right Of The People To Keep And Bear Arms Shall Not Be Infringed !!

An Armed Citizen, Is A Safe Citizen !!

No Guns, No Rights !!

Molon Labe !!

27 posted on 12/13/2001 10:08:26 AM PST by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expose
So the US anti-gun Nazis have openly allied themselves with a country run by gangsters. A country that can't keep track of nuclear weapons doen't have any business telling me I can't own a firearm. I hope the NRA publicizes the connection between the gun-grabbers and their commie masters.
44 posted on 12/13/2001 10:27:15 AM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expose
Due to substantial U.S. pressure, the conference refrained from issuing a global call for "regulation on the ownership of small arms."

Some of that substantial "pressure" is fully detailed here ;-):

Tyranny Response Team UN Protest Rally (7/14) TRT, SAS, FReeper thread links posted here...

http://www.FreeRepublic.com/forum/a3b6783e8397a.htm

45 posted on 12/13/2001 10:28:10 AM PST by Hail Caesar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: expose
Putin didn't learn anything at Crawford ranch did he? Or did he?
46 posted on 12/13/2001 10:30:38 AM PST by mv1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson