Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"THE REPACKAGING OF MARGARET SANGER"
Wall Street Journal | May 5, 1997 | Steven W. Mosher

Posted on 12/01/2001 12:28:35 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse

I was personally offended when Planned Parenthood recently announced plans to give its Margaret Sanger Award to the BBC documentary "The Dying Rooms."

Don't get me wrong: The documentary is a wonderful and courageous piece of work. An undercover camera crew managed to gain entry to China's state-run orphanages and videotape the mistreatment and murder of the girls there. I appeared in the documentary, testifying that this tragedy is a direct consequence of the country's one-child policy.

It was the award, named after Planned Parenthood's founder, to which I objected. For Sanger had little but contempt for the "Asiatic races," as she and her eugenicist friends called them. During her lifetime, she proposed that their numbers be drastically reduced. But Sanger's preferences went beyond race. In her 1922 book "Pivot of Civilization" she unabashedly called for the extirpation of "weeds .... overrunning the humnan garden"; for the segregation of "morons, misfits, and the maladjusted"; and for the sterilization of "genetically inferior races." It was later that she singled out the Chinese, writing in her autobiography about "the incessant fertility of [the Chinese] millions spread like a plague."

There can be no doubt that Sanger would have been wildly enthusiastic over China's one-child policy, for her "Code to Stop Overproduction of Children," published in 1934, decreed that "no woman shall have a legal right to bear a child without a permit ... no permit shall be valid for more than one child." As for China's selective elimination of handicapped and abandoned babies, she would have been delighted that Beijing had heeded her decades-long call for exactly such eugenicist policies.

Indeed, Sanger likely would have turned the award on its head, choosing to praise publicly rather than implicitly criticize China's government for its dying rooms. Even the inhuman operators of Chinese orphanages might have gotten an honorable mention, in order to underline the importance of their front-line work in eliminating what she called the "unfit" and "dysgenic." Sanger was not one for subtlety in such matters. She bluntly defined "birth control," a term she coined, as "the process of weeding out the unfit" aimed at "the creation of a superman." She often opined that "the most merciful thing that the large family does to one its infant members is to kill it,", and that "all our problems are the result of overbreeding among the working class."

Sanger frequently featured racists and eugencists in her magazine, the Birth Control Review. Contributor Lothrop Stoddard, who also served on Sanger's board of directors, wrote in "The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy" that "We must resolutely oppose both Asiatic permeation of white race-areas and Asiatic inundation of those non-white, but equally non-Asiatic regions inhabited by the really inferior races." Each issue of the Birth Control Review was packed with such ideas. But Sanger was not content merely to publish racist propaganda; the magazine also made concrete policy proposals, such as the creation of "moron communities," the forced production of children by the "fit," and the compulsory sterilization and even elimination of the "unfit."

Sanger's own racist views were scarcely less opprobrious. In 1939 she and Clarence Gamble made an infamous proposal call "Birth Control and the Negro," which asserted that "the poorer areas, particularly in the South ... are producing alarmingly more than their share of future generations." Her "religion of birth control" would, she wrote, "ease the financial load of caring for with public funds ... children destined to become a burden to themselves, to their family, and ultimately to the nation."

War with Germnay, combined with lurid tales of how the Nazis were putting her theories about "human weeds" and "genetically inferior races" into practice, panicked Sanger into changing her organization's name and rhetoric. "Birth control," with its undertone of coercion, became "family planning." The "unift" and the "dysgenic" became merely "the poor." The American Birth Control League became the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Following Sanger's death in 1966, Planned Parenthood felt so confident that it had safely buried her past that it began boasting about "the legacy of Margaret Sanger." And it began handing out cutely named Maggie Awards to innocents who often had no inkling of her real views. The first recipient was Martin Luther King-who clearly had no idea that Sanger had inaugurated a project to set his people free from their progeny. "We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the Minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members," Sanger wrote Gamble. Had Dr. King known why he may have been chosen to receive the award, he would have recoiled in horror.

The good news is that Sanger's-and Planned Parenthood's-patina of respectability has worn thin in recent years. Last year Congress came within a few votes of cutting a huge chunk of the organization's federal funding. The 1995-96 Planned Parenthood annual report notes that it has closed up shop in Mississippi, and that the number of its staff and volunteers has fallen by 4,000 over the previous year.

Perhaps the next time the Maggie Award is offered to someone of character and integrity-and more than a passing knowledge of Sanger's bigotry-he will raise an indignant cry of refusal. He will have ample grounds.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: margaretsanger; plannedparenthood
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last
To: No Left Turn
Maybe some people aren't completely blind.
21 posted on 12/01/2001 1:02:46 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC
The WSJ editorial page is the best in the land.
22 posted on 12/01/2001 1:04:20 PM PST by No Left Turn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse
Margaret Sanger is No Hero to Black America
23 posted on 12/01/2001 1:05:54 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Left Turn
There are lots of reasons for liking an article. Agreeing with it is just one. Try this on for size:

Time To Bury Chomsky

24 posted on 12/01/2001 1:06:03 PM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ThanksBTTT

25 posted on 12/01/2001 1:06:09 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GreatOne
It was one of the few times when I was able to clear the webs from some idiot liberal friends of mine when shown what her words actually were.

These people hide behind words; a policy geared towards ideas such as "creating supermen", and "eliminating the 'dysgenic'" has evolved into 'pro-choice', and 'personal freedom'.........

26 posted on 12/01/2001 1:06:44 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
But they failed to mention her writings concerning the creation of, in her words, "government-run farms and homesteads" for "illiterates, paupers, unemployables, criminals, prostitutes, dope-fiends, morons, mental defectives and epileptics."

Heartwarming, isn't it?

27 posted on 12/01/2001 1:10:14 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse
Thanks. Is this on the WSJ website?
28 posted on 12/01/2001 1:10:36 PM PST by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: No Left Turn
The WSJ editorial page is the best in the land.

Hmmm... I'm not sure that's saying very much. ;)

29 posted on 12/01/2001 1:12:55 PM PST by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC
Maybe in the archives. That's not where I found it. You can do a "google" search type in the title, and hit, "I'm feeling lucky"............which I am.....;)
30 posted on 12/01/2001 1:13:02 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Belial; MurryMom
ping
31 posted on 12/01/2001 1:15:55 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7; anniegetyourgun; nicmarlo; t-shirt
This should be quite a party.
32 posted on 12/01/2001 1:19:06 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC
Ha! Fair enough, but it is very good. Fiscally and socially conservative. Only knock is that they're a bit too warm towards lax immigration rules. They rarely write about it, though, and the attitude may have changed since Sept. 11.
33 posted on 12/01/2001 1:19:41 PM PST by No Left Turn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: tex-oma
Wouldn't want to forget you.......
34 posted on 12/01/2001 1:20:24 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: No Left Turn
"Why is a guy named liberallarry agreeing with this article? Am I just bad at picking up on sarcasm today?"

Just to reassure you that the world has not suddenly turned upside down (in case my first reply didn't do the job).

The biggest lie of all is that "human life is sacred".
There is absolutely no reading of human history that allows one to believe that people take that quote seriously.

35 posted on 12/01/2001 1:25:33 PM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rev. Jane
ping
36 posted on 12/01/2001 1:26:35 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse
I have to run now, but I just did a fast Google search to look for it and came across NYU's Sanger Project's response to the article here.

Notice the way they challenge the 'exterminate the negro population' quote. I think it could possibly go either way, but the reading of it (the lengthier quote they have) still seems to imply our understanding of it due to the use of phrases like "we do not want the word to get out..." and "occur..."

37 posted on 12/01/2001 1:27:11 PM PST by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse
Come on down...the Christian "Taliban" awaits.........

make that the "talibornagain" it has a certain anti Christ ring to it that fits both PBS and Planned Parenthood!

38 posted on 12/01/2001 1:30:37 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse
Margaret Sanger: fascist, racist, genocidal murderer. I first read her unexpurgiated remarks in a 1930's anthropology book, and even at age eight I found her to be absolutely repugnant. The brutalities of China's "one-child" policies and Nazi Germany's gas chambers would make Sanger weep - with joy.
39 posted on 12/01/2001 1:35:49 PM PST by dandelion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC
In doing so, he misappropriated several Sanger quotations, highlighted seemingly inflammatory Sanger comments without providing any context

Sounds (they) pretty weak to me. I must be missing the "good context" in which the following phrases can be used:

In her 1922 book "Pivot of Civilization" she unabashedly called for the extirpation of "weeds .... overrunning the humnan garden"; for the segregation of "morons, misfits, and the maladjusted"; and for the sterilization of "genetically inferior races."

Maybe Hitler really wasn't such a bad guy either. We just took it all out of context.

There can be no doubt that Sanger would have been wildly enthusiastic over China's one-child policy, for her "Code to Stop Overproduction of Children," published in 1934, decreed that "no woman shall have a legal right to bear a child without a permit ... no permit shall be valid for more than one child." As for China's selective elimination of handicapped and abandoned babies, she would have been delighted that Beijing had heeded her decades-long call for exactly such eugenicist policies.

They do that now don't they. China? Red totalitarian China?

Even the inhuman operators of Chinese orphanages might have gotten an honorable mention, in order to underline the importance of their front-line work in eliminating what she called the "unfit" and "dysgenic."

Dysgenic..........gotta love that "Orweelian" Newspeak.........people with "bad" genes; who might they be? eugenicist......someone who advocates the propagation of "good genes...again, who might they be?

She often opined that "the most merciful thing that the large family does to one its infant members is to kill it,", and that "all our problems are the result of overbreeding among the working class."

Maybe "Maggie" would be so kind as to keep a few around.........to serve her perhaps.

War with Germnay, combined with lurid tales of how the Nazis were putting her theories about "human weeds" and "genetically inferior races" into practice, panicked Sanger into changing her organization's name and rhetoric. "Birth control," with its undertone of coercion, became "family planning." The "unift" and the "dysgenic" became merely "the poor." The American Birth Control League became the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Right........words. To a liberal socialist.

40 posted on 12/01/2001 1:40:29 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson