"THE REPACKAGING OF MARGARET SANGER"

Wall Street Journal | May 5, 1997 | Steven W. Mosher

[He Rides A White Horse]

Actually, I think this stands on it's own merits. What say you?

[He Rides A White Horse]

Come on down...the Christian "Taliban" awaits.........

[liberallarry]

Good post.

[No Left Turn]

There are ample arguments against abortion outside of religion, like the eugenics one presented in this article. No where does this article bring up religion. But, I'm glad the horror of Sept. 11 and its aftermath were able to provide you with a groovy new phrase: Christian Taleban. You use it like a teenager with a new cell phone: flashing it whenever possible, though there's little need for it.

[No Left Turn]

Hey, if a guy named liberallarry is on your side, you can't be wrong.

[He Rides A White Horse]

It's the truth.

[Petronski]

I cannot and will not read this or any article about Margaret Sanger. What she and her ilk have done and still do to this world makes me so angry my vision blurs and I need four or five aspirin to get right.

[He Rides A White Horse]

But, I'm glad the horror of Sept. 11 and its aftermath were able to provide you with a groovy new phrase: Christian Taleban.

My usage was purely sarcastic...........note the quotation marks.

[No Left Turn]

didn't get the sarcasm. I'm disarmed.

[He Rides A White Horse]

It's okay.......personally, I think we can demonstrate who the real Taliban is.

[Petronski]

*Catholic_List

[IM2Phat4U]

Great post.

[MitchellC]

Thanks for posting this excellent article. Is this level of honesty and quality typical to the WSJ?

[He Rides A White Horse]

I cannot and will not read this or any article about Margaret Sanger.

I hope more people do.............the real Margaret Sanger, however.

It's policy of genocide, relative morality, and every other foul thing you can think of.

[No Left Turn]

Why is a guy named liberallarry agreeing with this article? Am I just bad at picking up on sarcasm today?

[He Rides A White Horse]

I'm not what you would call a regular reader of the WSJ, mitchell; however, I came across this some time ago doing research on the subject, and I thought it really laid bare the soul of the so-called "pro-choice" movement.

[GreatOne]

I'm with you. In college, the femi-nazis had their little "Women's History Month" profiles, and she would be among the prominent ones. I ripped down each one I could find, or would find some articles, such as the one above, and tape those up, highlighting her words. It was one of the few times when I was able to clear the webs from some idiot liberal friends of mine when shown what her words actually were.

This is the scary thing about liberals - the fact that they lie and attempt to cover up the true intent of their ideas. It was either this article, or one similar to it, in WSJ which prompted Sanger's own son to write in to defend. He denounced every quote, in spite of the fact that her words were well published.

[lavaroise]

It's okay.......personally, I think we can demonstrate who the real Taliban is.

Ideological repent vs. progressist planification is the key.