Posted on 11/29/2001 3:56:50 PM PST by dennisw
Commentary November 29, 2001
Why Europe Hates Israel
By Bret Stephens, an editorial page writer for The Wall Street Journal Europe.
BRUSSELS -- Yesterday, a Belgian court heard arguments from
lawyers representing 23 Palestinians, survivors of the 1982 Sabra and
Chatilla massacres near Beirut, that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel
Sharon should be prosecuted in Belgium for crimes against humanity.
Though Mr. Sharon almost certainly will never sit in a Belgian jail,
the trial could hardly be freighted with more significance.
More than a half-century after the Holocaust, a Europe awakened to
the importance of human rights is looking to sanction the leader of
the world's only Jewish state for a crime that was actually committed
by a Christian Lebanese militiaman, later employed by the Syrian
regime of Hafez Assad. And yet blame for the massacres seems to be
apportioned to Mr. Sharon alone. Why?
Sensational Indictment
The short answer is the Belgian legal system, whose well-meaning
laws lend themselves to this sort of opportunistic and sensational
indictment. A slightly longer answer is that many Europeans are
sincerely convinced that Mr. Sharon really is a war criminal, as a
BBC documentary attempted to show last summer.
But the real answer is that
European governments today are,
by and large, tacit enemies of the
state of Israel, much as they
might protest that they merely
take a more "evenhanded"
approach to the Arab-Israeli
conflict.
Consider a few recent examples.
In April, France voted to censure
Israel at the U.N. Human Rights
Commission in Geneva -- while
abstaining from a vote of censure against China. During his
diplomatic foray to Tehran in September, British Foreign Secretary
Jack Straw offered that "one of the factors which helps breed
terrorism is the anger which many people in this region feel at events
over the years in Palestine." The European Union has so far refused
to follow America's lead by freezing the assets of terrorist groups such
as Hezbollah and Hamas, with the European Commission's external
relations spokesman, Gunnar Wiegand, arguing that "Hezbollah could
play a major role in regional stability."
That Europe today should be hostile to Israel may seem a bit of a
mystery, not least given the usual sympathy of aims between
democratic states. The explanation comes in several parts. First, as
historian Howard Sacher points out, Europe's left sees in Israel's
political evolution a betrayal of its utopian ideals. It's easy to forget
that in the years following the establishment of Israel, many
Europeans looked to it as a model socialist country. They admired its
largely state-run economy and especially its collectivist kibbutzim.
Hundreds of young European leftists, most of them non-Jews, flocked
to these farms in the 1960s, looking for the kind of workers' paradise
they could not find on the other side of the Berlin Wall.
This fondness, however, evaporated after the 1967 war, when Israel
went from being the Middle East's underdog to its Goliath, holding a
colonial-like mandate over the lands that came into its possession.
Partly under the sway of Soviet propaganda, partly in keeping with
the fashion of radical chic, European leftists abruptly transferred their
allegiances to the Palestinians and the PLO, which in the 1970s drew
the likes of current German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer to their
meetings. Meanwhile, successive Israeli governments veered to the
right. "The era when Yitzhak Rabin or Golda Meir could address their
European counterparts as 'comrades' at gatherings of the Socialist
International had passed," says Mr. Sacher.
There was also a shift of attitudes on the European right. With the
exception of Britain, whose notoriously Arabist Foreign Office has
dominated its Mideast policy under both Conservative and Labour
governments, much of the Continental right had at one time looked
on admiringly at "plucky little Israel." Thus, beginning in 1952, the
conservative German government of Konrad Adenauer provided Israel
with critical financial support in the form of Holocaust reparations,
while Charles de Gaulle's France helped to build its nuclear reactor at
Dimona.
But it was also de Gaulle who, in 1967, slapped an arms embargo on
Israel for firing the first shot in the Six Day War. Thereafter, the
hostility increased, partly because France fancied itself a champion of
its former Arab colonies, partly out of simple anti-Americanism. But
the chief reason, of course, was Europe's dependence on Arab oil. As
French President Georges Pompidou put it to Henry Kissinger during
the 1973 OPEC oil embargo, "You only rely on the Arabs for about a
tenth of your consumption. We are entirely dependent on them."
Since then, Europe's reliance on Mideastern oil has abated, but the
habit of reflexively seeking to appease the Arabs at Israel's expense
has not. In 1974, French Foreign Minister Michel Jobert toured the
Middle East, seeking to earn price concessions on oil for France by
mouthing a hard anti-Israel line. In 1980, the European Community
formally recognized the PLO despite the fact that Yasser Arafat had
neither made peace with Israel nor dropped his overt sponsorship of
terrorism. Currently, the EU supplies the Palestinian Authority with
the bulk of its foreign aid, even as much of that money goes
indirectly to funding textbooks describing Jews as monkeys and
vermin.
Given all this, many Jews have been led to conclude that what's at
work here is a thinly veiled form of anti-Semitism. But while there
might be some truth to this, it's easily exaggerated. Mr. Straw, of
German-Jewish descent, is clearly no anti-Semite, and the one bright
spot of Jacques Chirac's presidency has been his efforts to
acknowledge the sins of France's suppressed Vichy past.
Underlying Guilt
Underlying European policy is an uneasy sense of guilt. In the
immediate postwar period, Europe's guilty conscience worked in
Israel's favor. But in the postcolonial spirit of the '60s, the balance of
guilt switched to the Arab side: It was they who were being oppressed;
and it was Europe that, with its previous support for Israel, had
helped inflict the oppression. So Europe pressures Israel to withdraw
from the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, heedless of the dire security
consequences that such withdrawal would entail. That Israel has so far
refused to accede to this pressure stands as an infuriating rebuke to
modern Europe's fundamental conception of itself as the virtuous
defeated, free to pass judgment while absolved of the moral
responsibilities of wielding actual power.
Whatever the case, a foreign policy based on a combination of
left-wing disillusionment, French opportunism and all-around
cravenness cannot yield good results. With the U.S. State Department
increasingly leaning toward the European line on Israel, it's well that
the basis of that policy be properly understood.
What a pathetic comment. Israel re-invests a few billion and makes something of it. Instead of praising that you have some snide putrid comment. You would be happy if it went into some sinkhole or rats nest like the Palestinian Authority.
Here's a few innovations and inventions which Israel has done - that little country the size of New Jersey and surrounded by your Arab Muslim losers:
Israel Flora, Fauna Database On Internet
(DFJ-MarApr01) A unique database of Israeli flora and fauna has been developed as an Internet site by a team of researchers at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem headed by Dr. Ronen Kadmon, chairman of the Department of Evolution, Systematics and Ecology.
More
Unique Bandage Saves Lives Of Terror, Accident Victims
(DFJ-MarApr01) Victims of severe injuries in terror attacks, road accidents, earthquakes, and military battles may have an increased margin of survival, thanks to a unique pressure dressing to stop bleeding developed by a researcher at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.
More
Israeli-Developed Computer Program Saves Lives
(DFJ-MarApr01) A unique Israeli-developed computer program has saved lives, improved quality assurance, and caused a major reduction in medical negligence. The computer program - Intelligent Patient Record for Obstetrics (IPROB) has been sold to hospitals in the USA. It could revolutionize the practice of medicine and significantly lower hospital costs.
More
Persimmons Can Prevent Clogged Arteries
(DFJ-MarApr01) An apple a day is not bad advice - but a persimmon a day is more worthwhile, especially for your heart. Take it from a group of researchers headed by Dr. Shela Gorinstein, a researcher in the Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Natural Products at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem School of Pharmacy.
More
Berry Boosts Immune System
(DFJ-MarApr01) A study conducted at Hadassah-University Hospital in Jerusalem's Ein Kerem has confirmed that the black elderberry boosts immune system activity and is beneficial in immune deficiency diseases such as cancer and AIDS.
More
Vitamin Rich Tomatoes Developed
(DFJ-Jan/Feb 01) Carotenoids are natural pigments, which are responsible for many of the yellow, orange and red colors seen in living organisms. In leaves, carotenoids perform essential functions in photosynthesis and protection against photodynamic damage to the cells.
More
Bugs Against Bugs - Natural Pest Control
(DFJ-Jan/Feb 01) A new method for biological control of a pest that destroys pepper crops has been developed by researchers in the Department of Entomology at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem's Faculty of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Quality Sciences in Rehovot.
More
High Resolution Image Satellite Launched
(DFJ-Jan/Feb 01) ImageSat International has successfully launched from Siberia the first of eight lightweight, high-resolution imaging satellites that it plans to put into orbit.
More
Intel's New Pentium 4 From Israel
(DFJ-Jan/Feb 01) Kiryat Gat - Intel Corp. recently introduced the Pentium 4 microprocessor, heralded as the fastest chip available for personal computers.
More
Jellyfish Antidote Developed
(Disp.NovDec-00) An Israeli scientist-turned-businessman believes he's invented the world's first way of protecting bathers against the sting of jellyfish. And he hopes to turn it into an international business, with a market of tens of millions.
More
103 Murdered
351 Wounded - Attempted Murder
454 Total Killed and Wounded
So Israel tries to murder more than 454. They "only" succeed in murdering 103.
Yet suicide bombers "only" kill two or three Israelis and that makes all Palestinians supposed to be evil incarnate.
Funny, that's the same thing my boss said when he handed me my new mop the following Monday...
Maybe we should send the Israelis back there, then, to make Europe soooo much more better than it is.
Then it would be a win-win for everybody.
It also cost the US 50 billion per year in direct military costs to ensure 15 billion per year in oil imports from Saudi Arabia/Kuwait.
Which is the real money loser?
Maybe we should send the Israelis there, then, to make Europe soooo much more better than it is.
Then it would be a win-win for everybody.
No it would not, for then every square millimetre of Arabia, North Africa and the mid-East would become an open sewer -- and the scumbag Europeans would simply pick up where they were at when we went and saved them from themselves in 1939-45 [Just before -- at the cost of the squandering of Fifteen Trillion Dollars of the confiscated wealth of America's (Of the world's, that is) most creative, innovative and productive Citizens -- we saved them from themselves every year since 1945!] -- and slaughter one another; the Jewish People particularly; in bloody abatoirs set up for just that purpose -- and wouldn't have to -- gutless Fat-Rat-Bastard-Arafat-style -- send their obscene emissaries over here to do their murdering for them.
................Simply put, Europe is dominated politically by the same Vatican that aligned itself closely with The Third Reich. To understand european antisemetism, one has remember that 'the city set on seven hills' has historically contributed much to that work of darkness.
Catholicism, in its bogus claim to be the 'inheritors' of God's promises to the descendants of Abraham, is doctrinally opposed to the restoration of a Jewish State.
If the Bible means what is says throughout the Old and New Testament, God is not done with His plans for The Chosen People. And the guy with the 'fish-god hat on his head' is more the modern day high-priest of the pagan deity 'Dagon' than 'The Vicar of Christ'.
Jesus of Nazareth wept over Jerusalem, understanding that the religious leaders of his day were far more concerned with social status and political influence than repentance. His tears were shed knowing the suffering that would come upon his people as the result of their obstinance. His words to his fellow Jews were, "you shall not see me again until you say, 'blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord'.................Meaning that He would return as the Messianic King of Israel in fulfillment of a major theme of prophetic scripture.
The attitude of the Vatican is completely opposed to God's plan for the world. Rather than the King of the Jews reigning from Jerusalem they wish to install their own 'anointed' King of Jerusalem, Juan Carlos of Spain..........(welcome to the european faction of the emerging NWO)
I Never heard of that. You mean they think the throne of David is in London?
Is there ONE SHREAD of historical proof that your emotional rendering of history has any basis whatsoever in fact? Your analysis sounds much like the a continuation of the litany of delusive propaganda which originates in the Islamic world. Islam, being a religion which maintains deliberate LYING, subversion and murder for the sake of expanding global Muslim domination, cannot be trusted on its face.
Instead of answering the question...you posit that the US military has to be somewhere so the costs are irrelevent. Then you state, by inference, that 'belligerents' are responsible.
Let's clarify the equation, shall we? The 'belligerents' that you are refering to are arab nations, right? It was Iraq that we fought the Desert Storm with wasn't it... to protect the tribes of Saud and Saba (both despotic monarchies) that, now, are proving to be non-allies?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.