Posted on 11/19/2001 2:41:15 PM PST by A Mississippian
Crosswalk.com Entertainment Channel |
| |
Tolkien's Impact in Literature and Life
Tolkien saw himself as a hobbit in every way but in stature.
Crosswalk.com News Channel - A popular British magazine recently surveyed its readers to get their opinions about the best book of all time. Thousands responded. The landslide winner for the top spot in history: The Lord of the Rings, by J. R. R. Tolkien.
The literary elites were incensed and amazed. How could a fantasy writer win? They re-polled the country, and again Tolkiens work blew away the competition. Again they asked the public, and for a third straight time the public was very clear, Tolkien was their favorite. I, for one, couldnt agree more with this assessment. J. R. R. Tolkien was born in South Africa in 1892. His father died shortly after his younger brother was born, so his mother was forced to raise the both of them by herself. To complicate matters, Tolkiens mother converted to the Roman Catholic Church and was thereupon banished from much of her family and their support. A few years later his mother also died, leaving the boys to be raised by her parish priest. Tolkien proceeded through school in a fairly unremarkable way except for his unusual giftedness in languages not just in speaking them, but understanding how they worked. Some children make up their own words - Tolkien made up his own languages. He pursued this love of words through studies at Oxford and later returned to teach philology there. He remains one of Oxfords most celebrated professors. Through his study of languages he became exposed to the mythologies of the world. He wrote The Lord of the Rings, he later said, to give England her own myth. The setting for this myth is Middle Earth, a land Tolkien first described to the world in The Hobbit, a work he first wrote for his children. The story is about Bilbo Baggins, an unassuming hobbit that gets swept into an adventure (much to his chagrin) with thirteen dwarves and a wizard. (Hobbits are man-like creatures about half the size of a normal human. They live in holes, usually; they love to eat, garden, and give gifts. Most of all, they love to stay home.) Along the way Bilbo becomes the owner of a magic ring that became the center of Tolkiens masterpiece. The Lord of the Rings is an epic tale about the ring and how it fits into history. Tolkiens work has impacted me like no other author. Though many people recognize the quality and contributions of Tolkiens work to the world, there are a few things, in particular, about his life and work that have import for me. One is Tolkiens view of myth. Though most people see a myth as a story of something untrue, Tolkien saw myth as the exact opposite. His great friend C. S. Lewis once objected to Tolkien that, ...myths are lies, though lies breathed through silver. No, said Tolkien, they are not. There are truths, Tolkien said, that are beyond us, transcendent truths, about beauty, truth, honor, etc. There are truths that man knows exist, but they cannot be seen - they are immaterial, but no less real, to us. It is only through the language of myth that we can speak of these truths. We have come from God, Tolkien said, and only through myth, through story telling, can we aspire to the life we were made for with God. To write and/or read myth, Tolkien believed, was to meditate on the most important truths of life. Tolkien believed that what he wrote in The Lord of the Rings was true, not in the sense that the events really happened, but in the sense that they portrayed truth to us in a way that everyday events could not. After reading a bit of his work a friend asked him how the story would end. Tolkien responded, I dont know. I shall try to find out. He felt that he was uncovering the truth already there, only hidden. It was Tolkiens view of myth that that most aided C. S. Lewis in his pilgrimage to accept Christianity. All the other myths of the world, Tolkien said, are a mixture of truth and error - truth because they are written by those made by and for God - error because written by those alienated by God. But the Bible is the one true myth. It is a true accounting of truth, while everything else we do is mimicking. This perspective was decisive in Lewis conversion to Christianity. The second notable thing for me is Tolkiens value of friendship. It is a notable characteristic of his work and his life. In the LOTR, this is seen most notably in the friendships of Frodo and Sam and Frodo and Aragorn. In his life, this is seen in his friendship with C. S. Lewis. Friendships are gifts, not so much made, but given to us. Friendship occurs when two people meet who share a common perspective, experience, insight, treasure, or burden. There is a bond that occurs that brings them beyond mere acquaintances to friends. And that friendship should be cherished. Tolkien and Lewis certainly did cherish theirs. They were together at least three times per week: on Tuesday mornings and Thursday evenings with the other Inklings (a literary circle of friends), and at least one other day for lunch. Tolkien wrote, Friendship with Lewis compensates for much, and besides giving constant pleasure and comfort has done me much good from the contact with a man at once honest, brave, intellectual - a scholar, a poet, and a philosopher - and a lover, at least after a long pilgrimage, of Our Lord. Tolkien saw that the value of friends was not just that they stand with you, but that they stand with you and see the same things as you. Third, Tolkiens values, again in life and in work, encourage me. Tolkien saw himself as a hobbit in every way but in stature. He loved to eat (hobbits prefer six meals a day). He loved gardening, trees and long walks in the country. He loved pipes, stories and friends. He loved his family and preferred being at home to travel. He was jovial, kindhearted and generous. He was a devout Roman Catholic. He didnt set out to change the world, he set out to live the life he had been given in obedience to God. Like Lewis, Tolkien believed that home, family, and our labors were the heart of our lives. And for him labor included all his work, not just that he was paid for. He normally ate all three meals and had tea at home with his family. He rarely traveled, but ate and smoked a lot. For him, home, family, and labor were godly things that pleased God more than any good work could. The LOTR ends in a hobbits home. Some have thought the ending anticlimactic given the grand scope of the epic. But this merely highlights that, for Tolkien, all the wars, heroism, and great acts of bravery are not nearly so valuable and praiseworthy as what goes on in the simple day-to-day events of our lives. We fight exciting wars so that we can lead boring lives. Lastly, Tolkiens life was dominated by his vision of the future - not a vision of what he would do for God, but what God would do for him. His mind was occupied with, what Calvin called, a meditation on the afterlife. He was fully aware and confident that this light, momentary affliction is preparing us for an eternal weight of glory beyond all comparison. Like Lewis, he felt that the fact that we long for something more is proof to us that there is something more for us. He wrote to a friend: We were born in a dark age out of due time for us. But there is this comfort: otherwise we should not know, or so much love, what we do love. I imagine the fish out of water is the only fish to have an inkling of water. Christians are fish out of water, living outside their environment. We are pilgrims, aliens, exiles, who soon will go home. In December the first of three Lord of the Rings movies will be released. The other two will be released the next two Decembers. Why mention this now? Well, if you havent read it, now you have time to do so before the movie is released. As for me, Ill be standing in line in August. The Rev. Patrick W. Curles is Assistant Pastor of Trinity PCA in Montgomery, Ala. Copyright PCA News. Reprinted with permission. |
|
The animated version was a major disappointment to me.
I hope this new one will be as good.
Based on the trailer, it looks like they have the visuals down well. Now whether they will do equally well with getting Tolkien's somewhat stilted dialog onto video is another quesitons entirely. In any case, I'll definitely be seeing it.
Oddly enough, the world of Harry Potter is relatively uninfluenced by Tolkien when compared to most modern fantasy. JK mines other fields of myth and legend.
I've a dear friend -- an atheist who doesn't believe in reincarnation -- who's always maintained life is too short for fiction ... save for one book I know he read because he recommended it to me.
HE is passing along the books as HE reads them ... I have the Fellowship of the Ring sitting on my front table.
Of concern to me, however, is another extremely erudite friend's take on Tolkein's relationship with Lewis. (This came up in the bookstore during rounds on Sunday.) I always thought they were thick as thieves Inklings together but he says Tolkein was disappointed and/or upset with Lewis on several levels:
I have been following the production pretty closely since the info started showing up on the web about 6 months ago. I've salivated over the trailers .
I saw the Bakshi cartoon versions and they are poor compared to the current "live" versions, IMO.
I re-reading the LOTR again (~14th time) and find that I notice new things each time. I'm also going back over the Silmirillion, which adds even MORE depth to the story.
The current production is going all out for reality, in that all the props are being hand made (yes, much of the armor is foam rubber, but it is casted from actual metal armor that the creator first made with hammer and anvil.) The tools, weapons, pottery, etc. are all hand made, as well as the clothes. The swords (elvish and orcish) all have runes carved into them that you'll never see on screen, but they are there to give the actors the feel that they really are in Middle-Earth.
On the other hand, I have several concerns.
1) How much will they change the story? From what I can tell, they are trying to be extremely close to the book, as much as possible. No, Tom Bombidil didn't make the cut, and I'm concerned whether or not Treebeard will make it in (I'm looking into that). They also are increasing the importance of Arwen and some of the other female roles.
2) Will they add sexuality/bad language ? I Don't think there will be any profanity in it, except some Orcish cursing (and most of us won't understand that, anyway). Ditto on any sex scenes.
3)Will it be as good as the book? Yes and no. The visuals are going to be out of this world. We'll all be somewhat disappointed that someone or something looks different than what we had imagined or by something that is left out or changed.
4)How much will they change the story? As noted above, there will be editorial changes made, and the complete story WILL be told. I THINK I read that they will try to end each movie at a fairly climactic point. So I doubt that they will go exactly along with the "Book 1", "Book 2", "Book 3", etc. that Tolkien did. I don't have a problem with that.
Final comments for those who have not been following along. The first installment of the trilogy will be released in the US December 19, 2001, with the second and third being released December 2002 and December 2003 respectively. And yes, it will be hard to wait!!
Just so!
The Fellowship
The One Ring
The Long Expected Party
Gandalf
The Hobbitt cartoon was okay. The Baliski (sp?) cartoon/action movie woulda been okay if'n he'd followed it up to the end, but when the final half (shoulda stuck to thirds) finally came out, done in cartoon style, it really sucked.
I've got time for a re-read the trilogy before the 1st installment comes out. I understand all three installments are about ready, does anyone know how long between releases?
Arwen and Aragorn
Elves
Legolas
The Council of Elrond
Again, I think all 3 episodes are in the can, or close to being in the can. Does anyone know the release schedule? I can't find that info at the LOTH.com site. I know someone out there knows. ;^)
Thanks for getting this thread started; nice pix in the follow-on.
Still, I can't wait for next month's movie release.
Seriously, don't let me get started on Jordan. I have been known to stand and argue about Wheel of Time for three hours straight. However, I have also read all the books as soon as they come out. Why? Uh, because Perrin is cool?
Tolkien was the beginning of modern fantasy writing. Everything else is a child or step child of Middle-earth.
Gandalf looks meaner in that picture than what I imagine. Of course, it depends on which scene that's from, but in general I think of him as a nice, gentle wizard who only deals with the dark side because he has to.
It's obvious from what I've seen that the movie will be far better that the Ralph Bakshi effort, although the story is so great even that version was enjoyable.
Frodo lives!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.