Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/09/2001 8:37:30 AM PST by Starmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: *Homosexual Agenda
*Homosexual Agenda Bump

I get asked all the time: “How do I get on this bump list?” Well the answer is you can’t! The FreeRepublic Master Bump List is not a list of people who get notified about a topic appearing on FreeRepublic but it is a list of topics that you can click on and have posts relevant to those topics displayed to you. There are many topics like “WOD_list” (War On Drugs) or “Homeschool_list” (Stories that Homeschoolers may be interested in) or “Homosexual Agenda” (A list of articles related to that topic). And they all appear on the The FreeRepublic Bump List

When you are reading an article you can add it to the list by posting a reply to that topic and in the “TO” box put the name of the list you want it to appear on preceded by an “*”. For example if you want the article to appear on the War on Drugs list then put “*WOD_list” in the “TO:” box instead of someones screen name. You can also put it on several lists by separating the list names with a simi-colon “;”. Then when you want to see the list go to The FreeRepublic Master Bump List and click on the link for that list.

2 posted on 11/09/2001 8:46:57 AM PST by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
detached sex from love and procreation. He reduced it to another physical function like urinating. Homosexuals seem to champion anonymous bathroom sex

This encapsulates very nicely my major problem with people who define themselves by their sexuality...

4 posted on 11/09/2001 8:53:24 AM PST by maxwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
I advocate many more, bigger and stronger closets, perferably constructed on ships that can be loaded with the human types discribed above, and "SUNK!!!!"
7 posted on 11/09/2001 9:14:10 AM PST by Joee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
cultural and social breakdown will only get worse. We need a counterrevolution.

So Playboy is going to end Western Civilization. I thought Harry Potter was the one doing that...

9 posted on 11/09/2001 9:20:34 AM PST by alpowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
Kinsey, who died prematurely of disease associated with excessive masturbation...

LOL! Wouldn't most teenage boys be dead of this "disease"?

11 posted on 11/09/2001 9:30:19 AM PST by Sirloin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
Kinsey, who died prematurely of disease associated with excessive masturbation

So what is the name of this disease, and why hasn't it made it into popular admonition? Is there a national awareness walk to raise money for sufferers of this disease?

12 posted on 11/09/2001 9:32:13 AM PST by Dumb_Ox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
COUNTERREVOLUTION BUMP

It's kind of wierd that many seem to go right into the nervous laughter, heh heh heh kind of mode. Great article.

22 posted on 11/09/2001 10:13:13 AM PST by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
Uh huh. Right. No men (or women) ever had or were interested in extra-marital sex before the Kinsey report or Playboy magazine. Maybe in some extremely sheltered corners of the world.
23 posted on 11/09/2001 10:14:09 AM PST by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
Playboys are gay because they wear those ascots and silk smoking robes.

Boys who read "Playboy" growing up are straight because they appreciate the boobilicious magic of a nekkid woman.

I hope the clarifies the situation.

25 posted on 11/09/2001 10:15:53 AM PST by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
b
28 posted on 11/09/2001 10:26:28 AM PST by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
b
30 posted on 11/09/2001 10:31:21 AM PST by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
I guess what this article is trying to say is that sex is solely for procreating - any deviation from the "norm" is strictly prohibited! No masturbation, no oral sex, no doggie style, no fantasies! Nothing but good ol' missionary, once a month!

Count me among the perverts then. My wife and I both enjoy porn from time to time, and we're in a healthy relationship (8 years and getting better each day). Kind of throws a whole monkey wrench in the "porn destroys society" dogma, eh?

31 posted on 11/09/2001 10:36:39 AM PST by Sirloin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
Sexuality is just one example of differences between conservative ideals and liberal ideals. Conservatives would rather everything be done by private individual units (i.e. families). Liberals would rather everything be done by the collective. I can cite several examples of this:

Sexuality - liberals would rather see many men have sex with many women. According to liberals, sex should be more open, and casual sex, be it heterosexual or homosexual, should be more common. Conservatives would rather see sex confined to married couples.

Child raising - of course, it's hard to separate sexuality and child rearing, since one is the result of the other. Liberals would like to see more kids born out of wedlock, taken care of by the collective (i.e. socialized daycare). According to the panultimate liberal, Hillary, it takes a village to raise a child. What she really means is it takes a "commune", or at least socialized daycare. Conservatives would rather see children raised by families.

Education - liberals are ardent supporters of public schools, even if these schools are failing miserably in their goal of educating our future generations. Conservatives, on the other hand, have no problem with private school vouchers and even home schooling if it comes to that.

Health care - we all know what Hillary would like to do with health care. And we all know that conservatives oppose it very strongly.

Personal finances - liberals favor increasing government control of the economy by higher taxation, which ultimately results in wealth being redistributed amongst the members of the collective. Liberals also favor the collective social security system, administered by the "commune" (the federal government). Conservatives, by contrast, favor lower taxes and private retirement accounts.

So, if you want "the collective" to control everything, be a liberal and vote as such. If you think you can make better decisions about your own personal sexuality, if you think you can raise and educate your children better than "the collective", if you think you are a better financial manager than "the collective", and if you think health care is better outside the controlling hands of "the collective", then you are a conservative.

32 posted on 11/09/2001 10:37:58 AM PST by LaBradford22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
Heterosexual morality places sex in the context of love and/or marriage because it “humanizes” the sexual appetite. It ensures that the most profound and intimate physical act between two people expresses a commensurate emotional-spiritual bond. This is the only way sex can be truly satisfying for both men and women.

I assume the author has tried it all so that he is competent to comment on which is more satisfying.
33 posted on 11/09/2001 10:39:39 AM PST by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
Hey, Osama! Did you write this essay?
35 posted on 11/09/2001 10:41:55 AM PST by Lady_Marmalade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
This is the best article I have ever read regarding homosexuals and their hidden agenda. BUMPED and BOOKMARKED!!!
38 posted on 11/09/2001 11:27:53 AM PST by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wanker
Kinsey, who died prematurely of disease associated with excessive masturbation ...

U OK?

45 posted on 11/09/2001 1:39:49 PM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
Kinsey, who died prematurely of disease associated with excessive masturbation

How is the reader supposed to take this article seriously when it contains one of the stupidest sentences ever written?

48 posted on 11/09/2001 3:08:44 PM PST by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
He is fastidious about his appearance, his home and his possessions. He wants as much sex as possible and chooses sexual partners mostly on the basis of appearance. He is self-absorbed and doesn´t want emotional involvement or commitment. He thinks a woman would stifle him and children would be a burden.

Think about how fundamentalist arabs think about this topic.

52 posted on 11/09/2001 9:45:37 PM PST by Concentrate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
Kinsey, who died prematurely of disease associated with excessive masturbation

Hmmmmmm... How the hell do you catch a disease by masturbating excessively. Unless he couldn't see where he was going and fell off a bridge, haha...

61 posted on 11/11/2001 9:33:03 AM PST by maxwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson