Perverts, Pornographers And Liberals: Playboy And The (Homo) Sexual Revolution

Toogood Reports ^ | November 9-11, 2001 | Henry Makow Ph.D.

[OWK]

Rithmatic

[ecomcon]

COUNTERREVOLUTION BUMP

It's kind of wierd that many seem to go right into the nervous laughter, heh heh heh kind of mode. Great article.

[-YYZ-]

Uh huh. Right. No men (or women) ever had or were interested in extra-marital sex before the Kinsey report or Playboy magazine. Maybe in some extremely sheltered corners of the world.

[Nitro]

All good Americans should pull together!

[Wm Bach]

Playboys are gay because they wear those ascots and silk smoking robes.

Boys who read "Playboy" growing up are straight because they appreciate the boobilicious magic of a nekkid woman.

I hope the clarifies the situation.

[ramdalesh]

thanks for the note

[kaylar]

Yeah, that line , uh, jumped up at me , too. All I can figure is, Kinsey may have died under circumstances suggesting accidental hanging while undergoing autoerotic asphyixiation. I did a google search, and all I could find was that he suffered guilt from excessive masturbation while a child, had a weak heart, and died of heart problems, which his admireres blame on his detractors. This article outlines some of Kinsey's known kinky habits.

[Don Myers]

b

[Moleman]

All good Americans should pull together!
LOL, Fist's Of Fury!!

[billbears]

b

[Sirloin]

I guess what this article is trying to say is that sex is solely for procreating - any deviation from the "norm" is strictly prohibited! No masturbation, no oral sex, no doggie style, no fantasies! Nothing but good ol' missionary, once a month!

Count me among the perverts then. My wife and I both enjoy porn from time to time, and we're in a healthy relationship (8 years and getting better each day). Kind of throws a whole monkey wrench in the "porn destroys society" dogma, eh?

[LaBradford22]

Sexuality is just one example of differences between conservative ideals and liberal ideals. Conservatives would rather everything be done by private individual units (i.e. families). Liberals would rather everything be done by the collective. I can cite several examples of this:

Sexuality - liberals would rather see many men have sex with many women. According to liberals, sex should be more open, and casual sex, be it heterosexual or homosexual, should be more common. Conservatives would rather see sex confined to married couples.

Child raising - of course, it's hard to separate sexuality and child rearing, since one is the result of the other. Liberals would like to see more kids born out of wedlock, taken care of by the collective (i.e. socialized daycare). According to the panultimate liberal, Hillary, it takes a village to raise a child. What she really means is it takes a "commune", or at least socialized daycare. Conservatives would rather see children raised by families.

Education - liberals are ardent supporters of public schools, even if these schools are failing miserably in their goal of educating our future generations. Conservatives, on the other hand, have no problem with private school vouchers and even home schooling if it comes to that.

Health care - we all know what Hillary would like to do with health care. And we all know that conservatives oppose it very strongly.

Personal finances - liberals favor increasing government control of the economy by higher taxation, which ultimately results in wealth being redistributed amongst the members of the collective. Liberals also favor the collective social security system, administered by the "commune" (the federal government). Conservatives, by contrast, favor lower taxes and private retirement accounts.

So, if you want "the collective" to control everything, be a liberal and vote as such. If you think you can make better decisions about your own personal sexuality, if you think you can raise and educate your children better than "the collective", if you think you are a better financial manager than "the collective", and if you think health care is better outside the controlling hands of "the collective", then you are a conservative.

[BikerNYC]

Heterosexual morality places sex in the context of love and/or marriage because it “humanizes” the sexual appetite. It ensures that the most profound and intimate physical act between two people expresses a commensurate emotional-spiritual bond. This is the only way sex can be truly satisfying for both men and women.

I assume the author has tried it all so that he is competent to comment on which is more satisfying.

[alpowolf]

Being a libertarian, I'm selfish of course. I want to have sex with many women, but I don't want any other men to! The women, they're mine, all mine I tell you....

[Lady_Marmalade]

Hey, Osama! Did you write this essay?

[BikerNYC]

If you think you can make better decisions about your own personal sexuality...than the "collective"..., then you are a conservative.

I couldn't agree more.

[Nitro]

As they say, 75% masturbate and the other 25% are lying about it!!

[Captainpaintball]

This is the best article I have ever read regarding homosexuals and their hidden agenda. BUMPED and BOOKMARKED!!!

[Britton J Wingfield]

I guess I'm a pretty selfless libertarian, since I don't want all the women. I'll settle for half, as long as that includes Winona Ryder.