Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Oops!

A buoyant air of excitement swept the newsrooms with "reports" -- ostensibly from 'credible' 'sources' -- of a U.S. Helicopter crash in Pakistan, allegedly killing four American military personnel.

Amid the pea soup muddle and haze (the 'Fog of War), reporters at times can be excused for the occasional -- but inexorable -- flubs and stumbles, but not this time.

Despite the holes and flaws, CNN ran with the story, posting it prominently on their website during the wee hours of Tuesday morning.

Not to be scooped -- or out-maneuvered in the pro-Taliban propaganda department -- United Press International did likewise, embellishing the narrative with embroidered tales -- straight from the orifices of Taliban "officials" -- of Afghan "fighters" walloping the chopper before it made its way back into Pakistani territory.

And when did this skirmish allegedly occur?

Not Tuesday, nor Monday, mind you, but on Sunday!

The fact that these enemy claims of 'heroic' success suddenly surfaced against the backdrop of palpable advancement on the battlefront by U.S. forces and the Northern Alliance should have raised skeptical eyebrows, but the pallbearers in the press were too busy attending a *funeral* to notice.

What 'funeral'? Why, that of Operation Enduring Freedom, of course! You see, the all-knowing, all-wise, all-seeing media elite have already declared our military operation a fizzling flop. News dispatches for weeks have read more like obituaries -- buzzwords such as quagmire, fiasco, debacle, etc., sprinkled ghoulishly throughout.

Memo to the Pallbearers: Check the Casket -- it's empty.

I'm reminded of that Mark Twain classic: "The reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated".

And speaking of fizzling flops, ultimately that's what became of the Helicopter crash tale.

By midmorning, the newsiews stupid enough to have swallowed the Talibani ruse were backtracking -- if ever so gingerly.

Yesterday's Pentagon news briefing was priceless.

One of the reporters, broaching the subject, asked U.S. Defense chief Donald Rumsfeld if he could clarify the claims that four U.S. servicemen were killed in the crash.

In his unique, inimitable way, the Secretary wondered aloud what the heck the buffoon was talking about.

"Four service members were killed?", he asked.

"Could it have been another Taliban report?", he laughed.

"They [the Taliban] are very busy, those folks", he quipped.

In an obvious jab at the press, he said "they [the Taliban] must have a hot line right into the media all across the globe".

Take that, CNN!

Secretary Rumsfeld is not one to mince any words, and he certainly wasn't mincing any at that briefing.

Looking the assembled throng squarely in the eye, he reiterated that "when we have a Helicopter that goes down, no matter for what purpose, WE TELL YOU".

Rumsfeld memo to the press hacks: Next time, before trafficking in rumors and ending up with egg on your mug, check with me first.

My two cents..
"JohnHuang2"


1 posted on 11/07/2001 12:35:02 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Hugh Akston; xm177e2; mercy; hole_n_one; GretchenEE; Clinton's a rapist; buffyt; ladyinred...

2 posted on 11/07/2001 12:36:00 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
early in the coverage when Mr. Limbaugh reported, erroneously, that the ABC News anchor, Peter Jennings, had been highly critical of the president on Sept. 11 for not returning to Washington immediately after learning about the attacks

interesting since Limbaugh wasn't on the radio on Sept 11.... that outcry was prompted long before Limbaugh mentioned it.

9 posted on 11/07/2001 12:56:26 AM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Oops! Now mail that the NY Times and see if they put it in the letters column.
10 posted on 11/07/2001 12:59:44 AM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
These outlets have kept tabs on the media for some time and were on the opposite side of the White House for the Clinton presidency.

Could it possibly be that the networks switched and not "these outlets"?

15 posted on 11/07/2001 1:13:57 AM PST by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Loved your two cents worth.
17 posted on 11/07/2001 1:16:37 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
"These are hard jobs. Just getting the facts straight is monumentally difficult. We don't want to have to wonder if we are saluting properly. Was I supposed to use the three-fingered salute today?"

Incredibly, getting facts straight from the Taliban seems to be their mission. And they wonder why Fox news has become so popular.

19 posted on 11/07/2001 1:22:52 AM PST by dokmad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
"Any misstep and you can get into trouble with these guys and have the Patriotism Police hunt you down," said Erik Sorenson, president of MSNBC.

Has he noticed how hard it is to walk with his foot so firmly crammed down his throat?

21 posted on 11/07/2001 1:29:48 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
The media, with rare exception, is little more than an intellectually vacant, pro-Taliban crime syndicate. They embrace a political platform that will lead to their destruction. I suspect that day is not far off.



23 posted on 11/07/2001 1:36:28 AM PST by who knows what evil?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
It's not very hard to point out America's losers,just turn on the nightly news and listen to the anchors.
24 posted on 11/07/2001 1:40:17 AM PST by BARGE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Oh my, where to begin? Practically every sentence in this deserves rebuttal! Here's a news flash: early in the piece they state that they are objective. Har har har! And to the lib news guy who mockingly wondered if he should use the three-fingered salute today, I suggest that he is thinking about two fingers too many when he salutes the public with his liberal drivel daily. It's just that now, he's being called on it. Sounds like the kitchen (the public) has gotten too hot for the girly boys in the newsroom, so now they have to start criticizing the public for being < gag > too patriotic.
25 posted on 11/07/2001 1:41:28 AM PST by GretchenEE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
The fact that these enemy claims of 'heroic' success suddenly surfaced against the backdrop of palpable advancement on the battlefront by U.S. forces and the Northern Alliance should have raised skeptical eyebrows, but the pallbearers in the press were too busy attending a *funeral* to notice.

Well said.

Some day these "reporters" are going to figure out that Rumsfeld isn't a lying clinton clone.

30 posted on 11/07/2001 1:49:30 AM PST by GretchenEE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
I haven't read of this in any media but believe it is worth bringing up here on FR, to whit: today's (American) journalists think more in "global" terms than they do "national" (I've met some young American journalists). Many really do not believe that their loyalties lie with the United States but with "globalities" or "global interests". Thus they're able to report quasi-objectively on the Mexican Zapatistas and while at the same time portray the Mexican government in a sympathetic manner they simply cannot do that with the U.S. since the U.S. is the bully of the globe (in their "objective" opinion). I believe many of these people have been so brainwashed in journalism school they're no longer capable of knowing the truth of any issue but simply stamp out stories which reflect their ideology. If you accuse them of bias they'll deny it... "bias" is a word which does not apply, in their minds, when the story is a "U.S. versus (fill in the blank)". In their opinion the U.S. today is simply an evil empire, built by Anglo males and therefore a worthy target; they think of themselves as "global citizens", not American.
37 posted on 11/07/2001 2:38:50 AM PST by waxhaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Though Mr. Limbaugh reported that Mr. Jennings had said, "Maybe it's wise that certain presidents just not try to address the people of the country," Mr. Jennings had actually made a general statement about presidents. "The country looks to the president on occasions like this to be reassuring to the nation," Mr. Jennings had said. "Some presidents do it well, some presidents don't."
A distinction without a difference.
38 posted on 11/07/2001 3:13:00 AM PST by Hugh Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Someone's got to slap Helen Thomas. The camera caught her falling asleep during Ari's daily press conference yesterday...did anyone else see it?

But before nodding off, she asked another of her anti-Israeli questions, complete with her standard interruptions as Ari attempted to respond. "Did the Israelis ask Bush not to meet with Arafat, is that why he's only meeting with Israelis?" [read that as her typical 'Israel runs America's foreign policy' rant].

I often wish Ari would insult her, or ignore her, or put her in her place some way, but of course if he did, the rest of the media would brand him a rude bully, or worse. Ari does a great job of handling her.

41 posted on 11/07/2001 3:44:14 AM PST by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Memo to the Pallbearers: Check the Casket -- it's empty.

LOL. Great line my friend. Your two-cents is right on.

Jennings is banned from my IB controller and while Rather has been somewhat fair and balanced since the events of 9-11, I don't believe that will last long. I don't watch Brokow. Can't understand his mumblings.

Think I'll stick with Fox News.

44 posted on 11/07/2001 5:07:12 AM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Funny, Rumsfeld doesn't have any trouble balancing patriotism and objectivity. Maybe Little Katie Communist on the Today Show is going to finally get confronted with decades of liberal bias in her reporting. Oh horrors, the NY Times is going to have to think beyond Clinton. Didn't Reuters and CNN merge recently, naming the Taliban ambassador in Pakistan as their new CEO? I guess I was just mistaken. Let's call Ashley Banfield, MSNBC's infobabe in Pakistan, and ask her -- or is she too busy getting yet another Islam make-over?
48 posted on 11/07/2001 5:30:45 AM PST by jrlc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
"Rumsfeld memo to the press hacks: Next time, before trafficking in rumors and ending up with egg on your mug, check with me first."

I would prefer that Rummy was a little more forceful. Something along the lines of: "Frankly you clym..er, journalists are really starting to make me doubt your honesty. You have been reporting the enemies' pap as gospel and give nary a care to the truth and this country's interests. If this bullsh*t doesn't stop, I'll just issue press releases and give interviews to those of you who display journalistic integrity--all two of you. I've got better things to do than respond to the lying Taliban. See you tomorrow after you've had a chance to consider what you have been doing. Good day."

50 posted on 11/07/2001 6:22:18 AM PST by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Good one, John!

I think conservatives should be proud of the effect they are having on the news media, forcing them to stand by their country instead of their mother socialism.

51 posted on 11/07/2001 6:38:15 AM PST by 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
As usual, your 2 cents is worth a million dollars! Outstanding!
52 posted on 11/07/2001 7:13:34 AM PST by kayak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Tonight's news was more of the same, piled higher and deeper. We started with Brokaw, who introduced 5 stories, each with a negative twist. Could not take it any more. Turned to Rather. The CBS reports completely contradicted the NBC reports.
55 posted on 11/07/2001 8:30:09 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson