Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Network Coverage a Target of Fire From Conservatives
New York Times ^ | Wednesday, November 7, 2001 | By JIM RUTENBERG and BILL CARTER

Posted on 11/07/2001 12:35:02 AM PST by JohnHuang2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Oops!

A buoyant air of excitement swept the newsrooms with "reports" -- ostensibly from 'credible' 'sources' -- of a U.S. Helicopter crash in Pakistan, allegedly killing four American military personnel.

Amid the pea soup muddle and haze (the 'Fog of War), reporters at times can be excused for the occasional -- but inexorable -- flubs and stumbles, but not this time.

Despite the holes and flaws, CNN ran with the story, posting it prominently on their website during the wee hours of Tuesday morning.

Not to be scooped -- or out-maneuvered in the pro-Taliban propaganda department -- United Press International did likewise, embellishing the narrative with embroidered tales -- straight from the orifices of Taliban "officials" -- of Afghan "fighters" walloping the chopper before it made its way back into Pakistani territory.

And when did this skirmish allegedly occur?

Not Tuesday, nor Monday, mind you, but on Sunday!

The fact that these enemy claims of 'heroic' success suddenly surfaced against the backdrop of palpable advancement on the battlefront by U.S. forces and the Northern Alliance should have raised skeptical eyebrows, but the pallbearers in the press were too busy attending a *funeral* to notice.

What 'funeral'? Why, that of Operation Enduring Freedom, of course! You see, the all-knowing, all-wise, all-seeing media elite have already declared our military operation a fizzling flop. News dispatches for weeks have read more like obituaries -- buzzwords such as quagmire, fiasco, debacle, etc., sprinkled ghoulishly throughout.

Memo to the Pallbearers: Check the Casket -- it's empty.

I'm reminded of that Mark Twain classic: "The reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated".

And speaking of fizzling flops, ultimately that's what became of the Helicopter crash tale.

By midmorning, the newsiews stupid enough to have swallowed the Talibani ruse were backtracking -- if ever so gingerly.

Yesterday's Pentagon news briefing was priceless.

One of the reporters, broaching the subject, asked U.S. Defense chief Donald Rumsfeld if he could clarify the claims that four U.S. servicemen were killed in the crash.

In his unique, inimitable way, the Secretary wondered aloud what the heck the buffoon was talking about.

"Four service members were killed?", he asked.

"Could it have been another Taliban report?", he laughed.

"They [the Taliban] are very busy, those folks", he quipped.

In an obvious jab at the press, he said "they [the Taliban] must have a hot line right into the media all across the globe".

Take that, CNN!

Secretary Rumsfeld is not one to mince any words, and he certainly wasn't mincing any at that briefing.

Looking the assembled throng squarely in the eye, he reiterated that "when we have a Helicopter that goes down, no matter for what purpose, WE TELL YOU".

Rumsfeld memo to the press hacks: Next time, before trafficking in rumors and ending up with egg on your mug, check with me first.

My two cents..
"JohnHuang2"


1 posted on 11/07/2001 12:35:02 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hugh Akston; xm177e2; mercy; hole_n_one; GretchenEE; Clinton's a rapist; buffyt; ladyinred...

2 posted on 11/07/2001 12:36:00 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

>>...like whether patriotism can coexist with objectivity<<<

They wouldn't know "objectivity" if it reared it's head and bit them ontheass.

4 posted on 11/07/2001 12:43:01 AM PST by fone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

..."Just getting the facts straight is monumentally difficult."...

HAH! They admit their ineptitude!

5 posted on 11/07/2001 12:44:42 AM PST by fone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

..."One executive [unnamed coward] said that while there have always been conservative critics, the current criticism could have a more volatile effect because of the fears and sentiments of a major part of the audience."...

GOT THAT? CONSERVATIVES are a "major part" of the audience.

6 posted on 11/07/2001 12:47:40 AM PST by fone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Gee, I miss all this crapola of the liberal media...by simply NEVER watching them!
7 posted on 11/07/2001 12:50:07 AM PST by D. Miles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

..."Mr. [The THING] Jennings disputed charges of bias but said he did not have time to investigate the claims..."

WHY is that Peter?????? To busy touching up your scars from your frontal lobotomy?

8 posted on 11/07/2001 12:51:26 AM PST by fone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
early in the coverage when Mr. Limbaugh reported, erroneously, that the ABC News anchor, Peter Jennings, had been highly critical of the president on Sept. 11 for not returning to Washington immediately after learning about the attacks

interesting since Limbaugh wasn't on the radio on Sept 11.... that outcry was prompted long before Limbaugh mentioned it.

9 posted on 11/07/2001 12:56:26 AM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Oops! Now mail that the NY Times and see if they put it in the letters column.
10 posted on 11/07/2001 12:59:44 AM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
I am REALLY getting tired of them throwing this up at Rush for 'getting it wrong'. I didn't need Rush to tell me what Jennings said: I heard it with my own two little ears!!! WE TOLD RUSH!!! Remember, he said he got hundreds of angry Emails. Every person I know who saw the coverage that day remarked about how Jennings slammed GWB all day.
11 posted on 11/07/2001 1:01:26 AM PST by SmartBlonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Now mail that the NY Times and see if they put it in the letters column.

There's not a snowball's chance in hades that they will ;^)

12 posted on 11/07/2001 1:09:26 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SmartBlonde
I agree with you completely: It was clear by his snide remarks that Jennings was implying that Bush was a quisling.

If ABCNEWS had a modicum of integrity, Jennings would have been fired long ago.

13 posted on 11/07/2001 1:11:55 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BurkeCalhounDabney
Why, that would be like the liberals suggesting that Rush Limbaugh was to blame for the Oklahoma City bombing!

Ah, and the "press" would never do that, of course </sarcasm>

14 posted on 11/07/2001 1:13:34 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
These outlets have kept tabs on the media for some time and were on the opposite side of the White House for the Clinton presidency.

Could it possibly be that the networks switched and not "these outlets"?

15 posted on 11/07/2001 1:13:57 AM PST by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartBlonde
I didn't need Rush to tell me what Jennings said: I heard it with my own two little ears!!!

Exact-amundo dear freeper!
On 9/11/01 our local radio station pre-emptied programming (natch) with ABC "coverage" as I listened (cringe) to Peter "the THING" Jennings I wanted to puke. Truly.
I have made every effort to avoid that lazy-eyed muck on TV and the only station I could hear covered him.

Admittedly, I was a bit too distressed about the entire situation to be really upset with him, but every other word out of his mouth was cause to give me palpatations.

I was outraged at the things he said. THAT without benefit of Rush's two cents.
Sometimes I think they just "don't get it." We do NOT take orders from RUSH. He just verbalizes what many of us feel on some subjects.

Pull that Canucks' visa....please?

16 posted on 11/07/2001 1:14:01 AM PST by fone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Loved your two cents worth.
17 posted on 11/07/2001 1:16:37 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Thanks, amigo =^)
18 posted on 11/07/2001 1:20:13 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"These are hard jobs. Just getting the facts straight is monumentally difficult. We don't want to have to wonder if we are saluting properly. Was I supposed to use the three-fingered salute today?"

Incredibly, getting facts straight from the Taliban seems to be their mission. And they wonder why Fox news has become so popular.

19 posted on 11/07/2001 1:22:52 AM PST by dokmad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dokmad
Those who wish to see just how awful the press's prejudices are need look no further than here:

-Media Research-free e-letter

-Reed Irvine's Accuracy in Media

-the Ben Franklin Foundation--

-Citizen's Coalition for Responsible Media--



20 posted on 11/07/2001 1:29:15 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson