Skip to comments.
Gay rights law foes must pay court
AP via The Washington Times ^
| November 1, 2001
| Tom Stuckey, AP
Posted on 11/01/2001 9:00:19 AM PST by FormerLib
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:35:48 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
ANNAPOLIS
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-139 next last
The Gaystapo may think that they've won a victory here but this will serve only to rally the forces of good against them. I'm attempting to find information on how to contribute directly to the affected individuals. Until then, donations can be made directly to
TakeBackMaryland.com.
1
posted on
11/01/2001 9:00:19 AM PST
by
FormerLib
To: Manny Festo; Bryan; Kevin Curry; Clint N. Suhks; EdReform
Ping!
2
posted on
11/01/2001 9:01:16 AM PST
by
FormerLib
To: FormerLib
...Gay rights law foes... It really hurts me to see the contortions the AP puts the English Language to these days... Communist b!stards...
;) ttt
3
posted on
11/01/2001 9:04:10 AM PST
by
detsaoT
To: FormerLib
I just heard a great anti-gay marriage commerical on WRKO (Rush.) If God wanted men to marry men and woman to marry woman, he would have put it in The Book. AMEN.
To: Big Guy and Rusty 99
Wait, was that a commercial on Rush or the Taliban Broadcasting Network?
Osama agrees with your logic completely.
5
posted on
11/01/2001 9:14:27 AM PST
by
Belial
To: Big Guy and Rusty 99
If God wanted men to marry men and woman to marry woman, he would have put it in The Book.I notice that the Founding Fathers left that out of the Constitution as well.
6
posted on
11/01/2001 9:15:09 AM PST
by
FormerLib
To: FormerLib
It is bend over time for the opponents of gay preference. It seems to me that the petitioners should have to pay only if they failed to get enough valid signatures, therefore wasting the states time and money. If they got enough but still have to pay that is a detriment to exercising the right to gather them.
To: FormerLib
Why do you want to PREVENT the voters from deciding on this issue?
If the law is as bad as you believe, then it will be struck down when it goes on the ballot.
It seems some people here are just as bad as Liberals in thinking that they know what is better for everyone else.
You make me sick.
To: Belial
Osama agrees with your logic completely.What, did you really expect him to be wrong about everything?
Actually, there have been a number of posts suggesting that many of Osama's followers have indulged in homosexual acts.
As to the flip side and their accuracy, well, let's face it, those bozos can't tell an exit from an entrance.
And make sure they don't forget to get their anal pap smear!
9
posted on
11/01/2001 9:22:40 AM PST
by
FormerLib
To: Belial
Could it really be that you know that no matter where the commercial was aired...it's right on the target?
(pull in your claws. The attack you used is as stupid as the content of your post)
10
posted on
11/01/2001 9:25:17 AM PST
by
John Doe
To: Belial
I don't want to stomp gays out. I just don't think they should get married. Am I a bad guy?
To: Paul C. Jesup
Why do you want to PREVENT the voters from deciding on this issue? If the law is as bad as you believe, then it will be struck down when it goes on the ballot.I think you better reread the article. The folks at TakeBackMaryland.com are attempting to get the question on the ballot. The Gaystapo doesn't want the people to be allowed to have a voice. If they get TakeBackMaryland.com to drop their challenge, the bill does not go to the ballot and takes effect immediately.
It seems some people here are just as bad as Liberals in thinking that they know what is better for everyone else. You make me sick.
I'll withhold comment here until you have a chance to reread the article, realize your mistake, and retract the rant.
To: Paul C. Jesup
If you live in California, and vote AGAINST homosexual issues, your vote gets struck down in the courts. Voting doesn't always help. Don't support a way of death. If you truly cared about these people, you'd encourage them to turn away from killing themselves and others.
13
posted on
11/01/2001 9:28:00 AM PST
by
goodieD
To: Big Guy and Rusty 99
There is a law that is higher and has more authority then mans law and that is Gods law. When mans law conflicts with Gods law, God commands us to break mans law. The bible makes many examples of this. That is why Paul spent so much time in Jail and God never said for him to stop breaking the law. I would urge every Christian to break any law that goes against Gods law.
14
posted on
11/01/2001 9:33:58 AM PST
by
Khepera
To: Big Guy and Rusty 99; FormerLib
"If God wanted men to marry men and woman to marry woman, he would have put it in The Book." And if God wanted people to eat pork, he would have put that in the Book. (The Constitution is likewise silent on consumption of bacon.)
Pardon me, but I fail to see why your religious notions should have any bearing whatsoever on secular law.
15
posted on
11/01/2001 9:36:24 AM PST
by
OBAFGKM
To: FormerLib
Gay Rights = UNequal Rights
To: Big Guy and Rusty 99
Marriage is a holy institution described in the Bible. God defined marriage to be between 1 man and 1 woman. That is marriage. Any other combination is not marriage but a perversion of Gods law based in heresy. Man could pass a law allowing this to happen but it will not create a healthy atmosphere for society. Christians must work against such laws with extreme prejudice.
17
posted on
11/01/2001 9:38:26 AM PST
by
Khepera
To: Khepera
Perfect rationale for murdering the infidels
18
posted on
11/01/2001 9:38:46 AM PST
by
JmyBryan
To: OBAFGKM
where are you again? I remember . . . The United States of America, a country founded on Judeo-Christian Morality. I am not saying that everyone should be Christian, but understand that these values are the core of the country.
To: Khepera
"There is a law that is higher and has more authority then mans law and that is Gods law. When mans law conflicts with Gods law, God commands us to break mans law." Isn't this precisely the sort of reasoning that recently led to unfortunate incidents in New York & Arlington?
20
posted on
11/01/2001 9:40:27 AM PST
by
OBAFGKM
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-139 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson