Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Big Guy and Rusty 99
If God wanted men to marry men and woman to marry woman, he would have put it in The Book.

I notice that the Founding Fathers left that out of the Constitution as well.

6 posted on 11/01/2001 9:15:09 AM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: FormerLib
The constatution does not tell us everything we need to know. The Bible on the other hand does. It's a bigger document too.
21 posted on 11/01/2001 9:41:56 AM PST by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: FormerLib
"If God wanted men to marry men and woman to marry woman, he would have put it in The Book."
I notice that the Founding Fathers left that out of the Constitution as well.

Just what does the Constitution have to say about marriage?

82 posted on 11/01/2001 12:58:29 PM PST by Looking for Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: FormerLib
The Constitution didn't define marraige as one man and one woman because the Constitution is not a dictionary.

Doesn't change the meaning of the word "marriage," any more than it changes the meaning of the words "bird," "frog," or "chimpanzee."

The Constitution is also silent on the issue of group marriage and interspecies marriage. Should we also accept that as tacit approval?


104 posted on 11/02/2001 6:13:56 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson