Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lock and load now! David Hackworth blasts brass for not trusting, training troops
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Tuesday, October 16, 2001 | Col. David Hackworth

Posted on 10/15/2001 11:37:51 PM PDT by JohnHuang2

WND Exclusive Commentary
Lock and load now!


© 2001 David H. Hackworth

Shooting first and straight while on a battlefield or a security detail is a matter of life or death. That's why weapons training normally gets the highest priority in the U.S. military.

If you're slow on the draw, you're dead, and your side loses.

Just ask the Marine guard in Lebanon in 1983 who didn't shoot fast enough when a kamikaze driver rammed his terror truck through the gate. It took the leatherneck one full second to chamber a round, another second to flip his weapon off safety and fire. By that time, the truck had smacked into the Marine billet he was securing and exploded. The Rules of Engagement forbade this expert rifleman from being locked and loaded even though his unit was on high alert for just such an attack. And those two seconds he lost arming his weapon cost 241 American lives.

Lesson learned: An unloaded weapon is useless. A lesson we've unfortunately learned and re-learned the hard way – over and over again.

Recently, the Navy dedicated a memorial to the sailors who were aboard the USS Cole when it was savaged last year by a terrorist attack in the port of Aden. But even though the members of the security detail on the Cole were at their posts on high alert – in an extremely dangerous port where they'd already been warned that a terrorist attack was highly probable – not one of their weapons had a round in the chamber. The security detail gave the small craft that almost sank the Cole and killed 17 sailors a big, friendly American wave – and the terrorists waved back – just before they rammed their human torpedo into the ship. Again, the Rules of Engagement stated no weapons would have a round in the chamber.

Not having a magazine in a weapon, even for a crackerjack marksman, adds at least two more seconds before he or she can get off a round. Four seconds is more than enough time to drive a 10,000-gallon gas tanker into a nuclear reactor, a high school, a chemical plant or some other tempting target.

Yet today, at virtually every U.S. military installation around the globe – and now at most of our airports, which are secured by the Army National Guard – the guys and gals manning the security details at exterior gates and other critical or sensitive areas, including ammo dumps and armories, are as impotent as the Marines were in Lebanon or the sailors in Yemen. They don't have a round in the chamber and, in most cases, they don't even have a magazine in their weapons. Yet America is at war, and we know that thousands of fanatics are out there ready to strike.

When I was a 15-year-old soldier in Italy right after World War II, I "walked my post in a military manner" with a loaded M-1 rifle. My sergeant, captain, colonel and general trusted me, along with thousands of other young soldiers, not to shoot myself or anyone else who didn't deserve shooting.

But somewhere along the way, that trust disappeared. In today's military, a leader makes one mistake and he or she is toast. So the brass do the big CYA thing to ensure that they don't get burned. As a result, uniformed MBA-types have made micromanagement a General Order. In a military where a soldier gets busted for drunken driving and his captain is threatened with relief, imagine what an accidental rifle discharge would bring.

Last week, in Germany, where some guards were ordered to tape their rifles' magazine wells for safety, four-star Gen. Montgomery C. Meigs actually charged his colonels with checking on the guards and reporting back to him. A job the corporal of the guard used to do when careers weren't at stake.

The other key factor in the mix is that the troops – less the Marine Corps and special units such as the Rangers – haven't been getting the training time they need on the firing range to be fully competent with their individual weapons. Even though there are millions of bucks for higher headquarters' simulation war-game playing for military planners and the brass, nowhere near enough money has been allocated for putting holes in targets.

Will it take another USS Cole disaster before we allow the troops to lock and load?

For Education And Discussion Only. Not For Commercial Use.



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: Lion's Cub
Do you think Rumsfeld knows about this?

The more significant question: Do our enemies know this?

Answer: YES

21 posted on 10/16/2001 4:32:00 AM PDT by cbkaty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: JohnHuang2
Quote of the Day by jwalsh07
23 posted on 10/16/2001 4:42:57 AM PDT by RJayneJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I had to purchase my own handgun 92sf Beretta and an armalite ar just so I could improve my qualifying score for promotion. We only shoot once a year for qualification and never practice during the year to improve skills. The stated reason is usually lack of funding.
24 posted on 10/16/2001 5:01:15 AM PDT by Newbomb Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
SMILE when you go through the airport you might see me Guarding it today.
25 posted on 10/16/2001 5:03:33 AM PDT by Newbomb Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: JohnHuang2
Where did this order come from and when did it get implemented? I have read an amazing amount of unbelievably ludicrous things but this one takes the cake. How in God's name can you expect troops to defend when they are holding what amounts to a water pistol without it being loaded?
27 posted on 10/16/2001 5:12:55 AM PDT by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: one_particular_harbour
Yea it's one of my favorites when I need a good laugh.
28 posted on 10/16/2001 5:17:09 AM PDT by Newbomb Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Newbomb Turk
Whenever my daughter (Gunner's Mate/Guns) came home on leave she always had me set aside a couple of days to spend at the range shooting M1A, AR-15, Beretta 92 FS, Colt 1911A1, Mossberg 590, and Remington 870. She could not believe how cheap the Navy could be about letting them practice.
29 posted on 10/16/2001 5:19:16 AM PDT by TEXASPROUD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: VietVet
If the examples cited in the article are true, I am more than just worried.

They are. You, we all, should be.

30 posted on 10/16/2001 5:45:30 AM PDT by Flint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
Where did this order come from and when did it get implemented? I have read an amazing amount of unbelievably ludicrous things but this one takes the cake. How in God's name can you expect troops to defend when they are holding what amounts to a water pistol without it being loaded?

Hey, I can top it. I was part of the Battalion Landing Team that went into the Dominican Republic in 1965. There had been a shooting revolt and the Marines were sent there to be police. We made a full Marine anphibious assault on the city of Santo Domingo. Not one round was in any rifle or pistol of any Marine (except perhaps the officers) during the landing on a hostile beach. The big joke amongst the troops was that when the bow door opened we were all to yell, "Bang, Bang, Bang:, as we ran up the beach to take defensive postion.

31 posted on 10/16/2001 5:54:11 AM PDT by Flint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: VW-Cat-Man
Hell they care more about our boots being shiny then us knowing how to shoot.

Don't kid yourself. There is nothing new about this.

32 posted on 10/16/2001 5:54:37 AM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dhuffman@awod.com
--I noticed that, too. Seems like any guard would have blasted the limo, but they didn't. But, no doubt it wouldn't have done a lot of good, bullets to bagels that particular limo has shootout proof tires, layers of kevlar, lexan windows, etc, etc. Because politicians, especially anti gun goon politicians, are "special".

It would be interesting to know exactly how many weapons were in that limo, plus on that private plane, I bet quite the deadly arsenal.

33 posted on 10/16/2001 5:57:02 AM PDT by zog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Arabesque
We take our first shooting lessons tomorrow

Congradulations! Chances are you will have a lot of fun,and end up loving it.

34 posted on 10/16/2001 5:57:09 AM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
I have a hazy memory of a young Military Police private on gate duty at Patch Barracks (7th Army HQ) many years ago who, when the general's driver ignored his upraised hand and drove through the gate, fired a warning shot from his .45 into the air, and pulled down on the limo. The driver hastily backed up to the gate, the general got out, and the private was promoted to Sgt on the spot.

Those days are long gone.

35 posted on 10/16/2001 6:03:06 AM PDT by logos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Scotty40
By the way, this posture among guards in Beruit was not dreamt up by the local Commander of the Marine Task Force - It was directed by the Head of U.S. Forces in Europe (I think an Army General in Italy at the time) to whom the Marine Task Force reported.

Nope,it was a civilian decision made by those elitist cowardly bastards in the US State Department. They are ALWAYS the people who make these decisions unless there is a actual war declared. Maybe even then,since they flat don't give a damn about American military people dying if it might make THEM "look bad" to the host gooberment.

BTW,never mind the guards at the gate. While it is true they should have had loaded weapons,the reality is they are only "speed bumps". There SHOULD have been some Marines manning a M-2 on the roof or some other commanding position that was set back but had a clear field of fire.

36 posted on 10/16/2001 6:04:36 AM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"Will it take another USS Cole disaster before we allow the troops to lock and load?"

Hack has a way with the language doesn't he? I wonder if it will take another WTC/Pentagon mass murdering before our news media and elected officials will give Hack and others like him the air time to educate our fellow citizens that we are in a life and death struggle and nothing short of total victory will do.

37 posted on 10/16/2001 6:12:56 AM PDT by ImpBill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logos
Back in 1967 or 68 three of my friends and myself decided to take a tour of Eglin AFB. The Base was an open base although certain areas were not.

After driving around and rubbernecking all the planes etc. we decided to drive out to the TAC area and see the Phantoms. As we drove, we approached a sentry standing in the middle of nowhere with an M-16. The guy driving simply waves at him and keeps going. The sentry had help up his hand to halt us and the driver either didn't understand or was just stupid (I think the latter was more likely).

We all began screaming at him to stop and he did about 50 yards past the sentry. We backed up and the guard simply told us to leave. The funny part was that as we passed him, the sentry was so flustered that all he did was stare at us.

About a year later, a story went around and I think it was true that a sentry at the TAC area had killed a real spy trying to get through a chain link fence.

38 posted on 10/16/2001 6:18:50 AM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Just ask the Marine guard in Lebanon in 1983 who didn't shoot fast enough when a kamikaze driver rammed his terror truck through the gate.

The explosives in that truck were provided by that great humanitarian and blood doner, Arafat.

39 posted on 10/16/2001 6:26:44 AM PDT by OrioleFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImpBill
Well said, my friend...Well said.
40 posted on 10/16/2001 6:31:17 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson