Skip to comments.
The Neverending Story (The New Christian Chronicles)
Southern Baptists ending talks with Catholic Church ^
| 3/24/01
| AP
Posted on 10/15/2001 6:54:40 AM PDT by malakhi
The Neverending Story
An ongoing debate on Scripture, Tradition, History and Interpretation.
Statesmen may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue. - John Adams |
Thread 162
TNS Archives
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: christianlist; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 941-960, 961-980, 981-1,000 ... 37,681-37,689 next last
To: angelo
Uhhh. Which one of those was "General Tso's Chicken" again?
SD
To: angelo
Man is my Hebrew's rusty. And it didn't help that it was unpointed. Say what?
To: allend
Except that we can domonstrate historically the distinctly Catholic doctrines were in place in the second century. This is why some Protestants are driven either to reject history or say that the descent into heresy must have been immediate.
Allow me to make an editorial correction in your post and I'll be in full agreement.
Except that we can domonstrate historically some distinctly Catholic doctrines were in place in the second century. This is why some Protestants are driven either to reject history or say that the descent into heresy must have been immediate.
To: SoothingDave
I understand that personal understanding grows. But I do not think you can make an analogy from the personal to the communal with respect to the Catholic church.
To: SoothingDave
Not to mention that the "images" we see here on our computer monitors. I guess if we post a graphic, or even a picture of little Hannah, it could lead Havoc to temptation. He should avoid any such threads.Oh my gosh! I've been worshipping my little Hannah by taking/posting pictures?!
I'm such a sinner.
965
posted on
10/18/2001 8:38:05 AM PDT
by
al_c
To: conservonator
Of course it develops, but in this sense: the Holy Spirit gives the Church a deeper or more poignant understanding of Christs teachings and Works, as we need them. You see that was the plan, not the modern tower of babble that sola scriptura, as embraced by neo-Christendom, has created.
I imagine you disagree with this.
Did you expect I'd agree. All necessary understanding was available immediately. Some, have played games with "Tradition" and/or "Magisterium" to modify this "understanding" to suit their needs.
To: the808bass
I understand that personal understanding grows. But I do not think you can make an analogy from the personal to the communal with respect to the Catholic church Just because we claim a guidance from the Holy Spirit to protect us from error?
A community understanding certainly can be transmitted over the generations. If we take as axiomatic that which our grandparents struggled to prove true, we can then work on to higher understanding. Truth does not cease to be true with time.
So why can't Catholic communal understanding grow?
SD
To: pegleg
Therefore a Christian trying to refute the Arian heresy would have had a hard time reading thru his/her bible to figure this out.This is true. Probably one of the reasons that the Arian heresy almost won. However, could a person depend upon the church for the teaching of truth? Aren't there some councils that have some Arian problems? Where would the individual turn to then?
To: Pelayo
When we accept His will and die to ourselves? If I, in a state of humility, don't belive I'm capable of understanding Scripture on my own, could that be an indication of the HS illuminating my mind?
No. Probably Satan.
To: the808bass
But I do think that there's a sense of communal guilt (which we see in the OT) that we, as an individualistic nation have gotten away from. Our actions do affect others. Our sin does affect others. To pretend otherwise is to put our heads in the sand.Well put.
To: SoothingDave
I actually believe my level of understanding was exactly the same the day I accepted Christ as it is at this moment.
Would I teach differently, would I change some of the things I have done? Sure, but my understanding hasn't changed. Do you see the distinction?
Now will you respond to the "Rocky" thing?
To: SoothingDave
I think if one wants to engage in apologetics and be taken seriously, he needs to be somewhat intellectually open. Oh. I thought you meant anti-intelectual. The above insinuates intelectual dishonesty.
To: SoothingDave
Then how come every scary movie with vampires or demons possessing someone (like the movie I watched last night) has people in trouble with the devil and they always want a priest? Huh? I've seen a lot of such movies and never, never has one person ever shouted out "get me a good Bible-based non-denominationl preacher." No, it's always priests and Holy Water and Crosses. :-) Hollywood goes in for image over substance. The world has no idea about the spiritual. Neither does catholicism. Jesus and the Apostles used the authority of the Father - not tokens, crosses and 'holy' water which have no power over a single demon. Faith doesn't make a symbol work. And invocation of symbols rather than the authority of God.. Witches call them "spell components" or "familiar" items.
973
posted on
10/18/2001 8:57:16 AM PDT
by
Havoc
To: al_c
Oh my gosh! I've been worshipping my little Hannah by taking/posting pictures?! I'm such a sinner.Last time I checked Al, pictures weren't graven images. A statue of little Hannah might be taking it over the line somewhat. No?
To: Steven
Last time I checked Al, pictures weren't graven images. A statue of little Hannah might be taking it over the line somewhat. No?My post was all in the name of fun, Steven. Don't worry ... I don't buy into the graven image thing (unless folks are actually worshipping them ... that would be wrong).
975
posted on
10/18/2001 9:13:02 AM PDT
by
al_c
To: OLD REGGIE
Now will you respond to the "Rocky" thing?Uh ... this doesn't fall under "idol worshoipping," does it? ;o)
976
posted on
10/18/2001 9:23:09 AM PDT
by
al_c
To: OLD REGGIE
No. Probably Satan. Well here we are, a news flash from the proddies "Satan is the author of humility!"
977
posted on
10/18/2001 9:27:11 AM PDT
by
Pelayo
To: al_c
Never ceases to amaze me how little regard the RCC and it's followers have for the word of God.
978
posted on
10/18/2001 9:41:31 AM PDT
by
Havoc
To: al_c
My post was all in the name of fun, Steven. Don't worry ... I don't buy into the graven image thing (unless folks are actually worshipping them ... that would be wrong).Too bad Aaron didn't own a canon 35mm. He could have taken a picture of the golden calf and then the milion and a half Israelis could have just stayed in their tents and bowed to the photos. :-)
To: Pelayo
Also if you take Ex 20:4, and De 4:16 to mean you can't make ANY image of a man or woman, than you have to include photos as well, and tv and film. They are all made by us and they are all images.This is getting crazy. Look at the scriptures...God says in the following verse (20:5) that we must not WORSHIP or SERVE the images, for "the Lord your God is a jealous God." He's talking about idol worship. Don't treat them as you would God. Don't pray to them, don't bow the knee to them, etc.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 941-960, 961-980, 981-1,000 ... 37,681-37,689 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson