Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Neverending Story (The New Christian Chronicles)
Southern Baptists ending talks with Catholic Church ^ | 3/24/01 | AP

Posted on 10/15/2001 6:54:40 AM PDT by malakhi

The Neverending Story
An ongoing debate on Scripture, Tradition, History and Interpretation.


Statesmen may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue. - John Adams


Thread 162
TNS Archives


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: christianlist; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 6,601-6,6206,621-6,6406,641-6,660 ... 37,681-37,689 next last
To: the808bass
I apologize for beig sarcastic, however you have yet to site any Biblical evidence to support your "worship" practices.
6,621 posted on 11/07/2001 10:41:37 AM PST by NATE4"ONE NATION"
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6361 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt
It is known to Us and to you that they who labor in invincible ignorance of our most holy religion

Cool. Now I know where I really got it from. And all this time I thought I got it from SoothingDave. Thanx XeniaSt.

6,622 posted on 11/07/2001 10:43:16 AM PST by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6619 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
The worshipping of the "image" of God or Christ is just as bad as worshipping to an idol because you are limiting the infinite to a picture or a symbol while you are trying to commune. Then why did God order the building of an ark and, later, the building of a temple?
6,623 posted on 11/07/2001 10:48:56 AM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6617 | View Replies]

Comment #6,624 Removed by Moderator

To: Havoc
Havoc, when you get a minute would please answer this question?

What is the difference between Salvation and Eternal Life? How can one have Salvation but not have Eternal Life? Where would that “saved” person go if he did not have Eternal Life? If there is a difference, what are we “Saved” from if not from Death unto Life?

Thanks.

-ksen

6,625 posted on 11/07/2001 10:52:26 AM PST by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6616 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
The worshipping of the "image" of God or Christ is just as bad as worshipping to an idol because you are limiting the infinite to a picture or a symbol while you are trying to commune. Then why did God order the building of an ark and, later, the building of a temple?

Because he could? The ark wasn't supposed to represent God, neither was the temple as far as I know...unless God looks like an ark or a temple, in which case I'm wrong.

6,626 posted on 11/07/2001 10:53:21 AM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6623 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
God might say, "What part of ANY didn't you understand?"

He might also say, "What part of worship didn't you understand?" You see, the two verses make up one sentence (there's even more, though, discussing the sins of the father) and you can't use one without the other. It basically is saying that we should not make images to worship. When I bow at the altar, it is toward God the Father, Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit ... not to the crucifix behind the altar or to the altar itself. There IS a difference.

6,627 posted on 11/07/2001 10:55:22 AM PST by al_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6617 | View Replies]

Comment #6,628 Removed by Moderator

To: allend
Yes, it is part of the Ordinary Magisterium.

Thank you. Does there exist another kind of Magisterium in addition to the Ordinary Magisterium?

6,629 posted on 11/07/2001 11:02:25 AM PST by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6624 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt
Pius IX, Encyclical "Quanto conficamur moerore," 1863: ................................

It is known to Us and to you that they who labor in invincible ignorance of our most holy religion
..............................

Proddies and IFBB's, can you make heads or tails of this? He seems to be asserting as true two completely mutually exclusive things.

6536 posted on 11/7/01 10:17 AM Mountain by angelo

Maybe it was this:

"But. the Catholic dogma that no one can be saved outside the Catholic Church is well known; and also that those who are obstinate toward the authority ... and persistently separate themselves from the unity of the Church, and from the Roman Pontiff ... cannot obtain eternal salvation"

It is the "but" that makes one wonder unless he also thinks the "obstinate" can also be "invincibly ignorant".

I have no idea what is going on, but It is not needed for my salvation.

Absoloutely true!
6,630 posted on 11/07/2001 11:04:09 AM PST by OLD REGGIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6592 | View Replies]

To: angelo
Would you agree that most people who attend mass should not be receiving communion, because they are not in a state of grace?

Without judging anyone in particular, it certainly is strange that hardly anyone abstains from taking Communion. And Confession is becoming more of a rare practice as well. Draw your own conclusions.

It should be said that in the olden days perhaps people felt too much the weight of sin keeping them "impure" for Communion. The pendulum has swung too far the other way now.

And, if you are not going to participate in the sacrament, is there a qualitative difference in being in the church versus watching it from home?

Is there a qualitative difference between watching the Packers on your RCA versus being at Lambeau Field?

That one is not in a state of grace to receive does not relieve one of the duty to worship and participate as fully as possible.

What about being in the church building, but in a separate crying room with closed-circuit TV?

If need requires (that is an actual crying baby) this concession is given, but one is still expected to make it to the altar for Communion. Likewise if a Churhc is too crowded and overflows onto the sidewalk or an auxiliary building, one can not accuse you of "missing" Mass because one is physically prevented from entering the building.

SD

6,631 posted on 11/07/2001 11:04:46 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6570 | View Replies]

Comment #6,632 Removed by Moderator

To: angelo
. If you are not going to receive communion, is it better to stay home and watch the mass on EWTN, or to go to your local clown mass?

As long as the local clown Mass is offering a valid sacrament, one should offer up the suffering to Jesus and go. Then watch EWTN.

SD

6,633 posted on 11/07/2001 11:06:53 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6573 | View Replies]

To: al_c
When I bow at the altar, it is toward God the Father, Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit ... not to the crucifix behind the altar or to the altar itself. There IS a difference.

Is it okay to do the physical act as long as you believe you're worshipping God? Does that mean it's okay to murder someone as long as you're worshipping God while you're doing it?

6,634 posted on 11/07/2001 11:07:50 AM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6627 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
The ark wasn't supposed to represent God, neither was the temple as far as I know...unless God looks like an ark or a temple, in which case I'm wrong. But your point was no limiting of god's presence.
6,635 posted on 11/07/2001 11:08:47 AM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6626 | View Replies]

To: Invincibly Ignorant; IMRight
Well. Wasn't what Bonifice said written in your magic sternum?

By golly, it is in there!!!


6,636 posted on 11/07/2001 11:09:16 AM PST by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6593 | View Replies]

To: allend
Yes, the Extraordinary Magisterium. Only two papal pronouncements are in that category. Numerous pronouncements of ecumenical councils are in it. A solemn definition is what puts a teaching in the Extraordinary Magisterium.

So the pronouncements that came out of vatican II are in the Extraordianry Magisterium?

6,637 posted on 11/07/2001 11:11:16 AM PST by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6632 | View Replies]

To: IMRight
Was Paul "infallible"? or Peter or James or the Gospel authors?

Being in a position of authority over God's people does NOT mean that you can declare that "the Redskins will win this weekend" and have it be infallible. Each of the examples given above is a fallible man who made many fallible statements, but was still used by God to act in an infallible manner.

Saying that the Redskins will win is prophecy, not declaration of doctrine. Besides your bad example, let us examine the rest of your statement. Were Peter or Paul infallible when they wrote their letters? Yes.

Each of these men were fallible creatures who were used by God to act in an infallible manner. That is exactly what happens when the Pope acts infallibly. Exactly the same thing. We don't mean that everything he says is correct for his entire papcy. We don't mean he never sins. We mean that in certain extraordinary conditions, the Holy Spirit works through him to guarantee truth.

SD

6,638 posted on 11/07/2001 11:12:47 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6587 | View Replies]

To: Invincibly Ignorant
Steven(Invincibly Ignorant) seems to understand it; he should answer it for us.

Huh?

I attempted an answer on your behalf. Forgive me for being so presumptious.
6,639 posted on 11/07/2001 11:14:16 AM PST by OLD REGGIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6594 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
The 2nd commandment precisely and exactly says:

Exo 20:4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:

This would seem to clearly rule out having a cross or a crucifix or anything else as a "symbol" of your faith. I have heard the following arguments:

"But we're not really worshipping the cross". That doesn't seem to matter. Thou shalt not make ANY graven image

Ahem. You have no graven images in your possession? No images of anything on earth, in the sea or in the heavens?

The literal prohibition is against making anything which images anything else. I bet your computer screen containsd representations of "letters" from the "alphabet." This is a violation.

SD

6,640 posted on 11/07/2001 11:16:55 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6602 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 6,601-6,6206,621-6,6406,641-6,660 ... 37,681-37,689 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson