Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DouglasKC
The ark wasn't supposed to represent God, neither was the temple as far as I know...unless God looks like an ark or a temple, in which case I'm wrong. But your point was no limiting of god's presence.
6,635 posted on 11/07/2001 11:08:47 AM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6626 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS
The ark wasn't supposed to represent God, neither was the temple as far as I know...unless God looks like an ark or a temple, in which case I'm wrong. But your point was no limiting of god's presence.

Well, my main point was the violation of the second commandment. My secondary point (my opinion) was that we shouldn't have images of God or symbols of God because they limit our understanding of the true God by boiling him down to a symbol or an image.

6,643 posted on 11/07/2001 11:21:42 AM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6635 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson