Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Neverending Story (The New Christian Chronicles)
Southern Baptists ending talks with Catholic Church ^ | 3/24/01 | AP

Posted on 10/15/2001 6:54:40 AM PDT by malakhi

The Neverending Story
An ongoing debate on Scripture, Tradition, History and Interpretation.


Statesmen may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue. - John Adams


Thread 162
TNS Archives


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: christianlist; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 31,641-31,66031,661-31,68031,681-31,700 ... 37,681-37,689 next last
To: Invincibly Ignorant
Might be a good idea to let everyone know from where this cut and paste comes from.

I think I seen it down at the grocery store in the check out line on one of those tabloid mags.

BigMack

31,661 posted on 03/04/2002 11:27:20 AM PST by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31653 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
"So why I believe it is because someone or something taught it to me."

Thank you for the response.

JM
31,662 posted on 03/04/2002 11:36:19 AM PST by JohnnyM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31644 | View Replies]

To: angelo
How goes it with the little one, my friend?

She's doing about as well as a newborn can. She complains a lot with bouts of gas pains ... but then, so do I. ;o) Other than that, things are great. I'm back at work now so the wife is pretty much going stir-crazy staying home all the time. But now that the unseasonably cold temps are gone, maybe she can get out more.

Did you notice that you have a FReepmail?

31,663 posted on 03/04/2002 11:41:28 AM PST by al_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31660 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; JohnnyM
(Hey, let's as angelo what he thinks.)

Most Jews interpret these "times" figuratively, not literally.

31,664 posted on 03/04/2002 11:42:35 AM PST by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31644 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyM
So here we have precedent of a day signifying a year in terms of prophecy. Now we have the benefit of hindsight on the issue and know for a fact that there was no fulfillment of this prophecy 70 weeks (490 days) after Daniel received it. We can, however, make a strong case using weeks as 7 years to pinpoint the coming of Christ. A more strict translation of weeks would actually result in the term "seven's" which would give more foundation to the the 490 years translation. So an interpretation of the 70 weeks using years is a valid exegesis using Scripture.

Yeah, OK. It's still not "literal." Go to any dictionary of the English language and look up the term "week." You will not find that it means a "year."

SD

31,665 posted on 03/04/2002 11:42:48 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31659 | View Replies]

To: angelo
Most Jews interpret these "times" figuratively, not literally.

Is that something they learned from the Catholics, or is it something to do with the way Hebrew is spoken?

SD

31,666 posted on 03/04/2002 11:43:58 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31664 | View Replies]

To: al_c
She's doing about as well as a newborn can. She complains a lot with bouts of gas pains ... but then, so do I.

Simethicone is your friend. (aka Mylicon)

SD

31,667 posted on 03/04/2002 11:44:47 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31663 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyM

70 weeks using years is a valid exegesis using Scripture.

Now I understand what you meant. However, I believe that your interpretation is still figuritive. Ie weeks does not mean weeks. It is different then a general interpretation that means "a long time" but it can not be said to be literal.

31,668 posted on 03/04/2002 11:46:30 AM PST by Joyful Wisdom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31659 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
"Go to any dictionary of the English language and look up the term "week." You will not find that it means a "year.""

Didn't say a week meant a year. Week means a period of seven and I used *shock* the Bible to interpret the passage. It is that way in the Bible. Now if you want to use the english dictionary to perform scriptural interpretation thats fine by me, but it will seriously hamper any real study of the Word.

JM
31,669 posted on 03/04/2002 11:48:49 AM PST by JohnnyM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31665 | View Replies]

To: trad_anglican
I'm not absolutely sure, but if I understand the rules correctly, he can do that as long as he's not speaking prophetically. Calvinball, anyone?


31,670 posted on 03/04/2002 11:53:22 AM PST by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31656 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyM
Didn't say a week meant a year. Week means a period of seven

I'm sorry, you are right. You said a week is seven years. Find that in the dictionary. Literally.

and I used *shock* the Bible to interpret the passage. It is that way in the Bible.

Who's arguing with you? What I am saying is what you are doing is not called being "literal." 70 weeks, literally means 70 times 7 days=490 days. Not 490 years. Literally.

Now if you want to use the english dictionary to perform scriptural interpretation thats fine by me, but it will seriously hamper any real study of the Word.

Say what? Are you going for Sentence of the Day, cause I think you've won? Using an English dictionary will seriously hamper any real study of the Word? LOL

(He shudders to ask about a Greek dictionary)

SD

31,671 posted on 03/04/2002 11:53:42 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31669 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
"70 weeks, literally means 70 times 7 days"

No. It LITERALLY means 70 sevens.

JM
31,672 posted on 03/04/2002 11:57:18 AM PST by JohnnyM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31671 | View Replies]

To: al_c
Did you notice that you have a FReepmail?

Now that you mention it...yes. Back at you, al.

31,673 posted on 03/04/2002 11:57:24 AM PST by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31663 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyM
week From the beginning, time was divided into weeks, each consisting of six days of working and one of rest (Gen. 2:2, 3; 7:10; 8:10, 12; 29:28). The references to this division of days becomes afterwards more frequent (Ex. 34:22; Lev. 12:5; Num. 28:26; Deut. 16:16; 2 Chr. 8:13; Jer. 5:24; Dan. 9:24-27; 10:2, 3). It has been found to exist among almost all nations.

Source: Easton's 1897 Bible Dictionary

SD

31,674 posted on 03/04/2002 12:00:41 PM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31672 | View Replies]

To: angelo
The good die young. Why couldn't Calvin and Hobbs have suffered the same fate as Peanuts and never gone away?
31,675 posted on 03/04/2002 12:01:13 PM PST by trad_anglican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31670 | View Replies]

To: angelo;saradippity;all
Vatican stance on gay clergy criticized.

All Catholic bashers should be thrilled to see them allowing their Church to crumble as we all watch on, but I love all Catholics, and will rejoice when I see them take the bull by the horns, and do what is best for the sheep.

Can you picture a herd of innocent sheep that have complete trust in their shepherd, finally finding out that he is the predator, and not the wolf they have hear baying in the distance.

I have never jumped on the RC's about this, because I knew it was so embarrassing for them, and I knew they wanted to see it dealt with as much as I did, but I think their own hierarchy may need their support now more then anytime, and by that I mean to let them know you support doing what is necessary to stop the cancer now, before it infects the whole Church.

How many parents are going to allow their children to become involved in church activities, if they can't trust them alone with a priest?

Again, your Church needs your support in order to know you back them in what needs to be done.

31,676 posted on 03/04/2002 12:01:56 PM PST by JHavard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31623 | View Replies]

To: allend
Thus, the Protestants claim more for every one of themselves than we claim even for the Pope.
Too bad.........

It's right there in the Book!


NIV 1 Timothy 2:5-6
5. For there is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus,
6. who gave himself as a ransom for all men--the testimony given in its proper time.

NIV John 14:16-18
16. And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Counselor to be with you forever--
17. the Spirit of truth. The world cannot accept him, because it neither sees him nor knows him. But you know him, for he lives with you and will be in you.
18. I will not leave you as orphans; I will come to you.
31,677 posted on 03/04/2002 12:02:33 PM PST by Elsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31477 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
** Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties - Gleason L. Archer **

"The word for 'week' is 'sabu', which is derived from 'seba', the word for 'seven'. Its normal plural is feminine in form: 'sebuot'. Only in this chapter of Daniel does it appear in the masculine plural 'sabuim'." "Therefore, it is strongly suggestive of the idea "heptad" (a series or combination of seven), rather than a 'week' in the sense of a series of seven days."

JM
31,678 posted on 03/04/2002 12:03:04 PM PST by JohnnyM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31674 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
In my confused, part Unitarian, part Bible Believing Christian, and part Jew, mind I find when I pray spontaneously, it is to God. I generally don't feel the need to pray to Jesus as the mediator. (I must qualify this because I have also prayed to Jesus).

I agree this issue is a popular one and I see no need to condemn you for it.
I have also prayed to Jesus. i do not believe we are to though.

Christ specifically taught us to pray to the Father.
He tore the curtain to allow direct access to the Father.
He is the sacrifice that having faith in brings us to communion with the Father. This is what "mediator" represents. Jesus does not repeat our prayers, His blood is what allows are prayers to be heard.

We are now direct ticket with God the Father because of Christ's "go between" (mediation) work of dyiung on the cross for our sins.

We ask the Father IN THE NAME of the Son, but it is still the Father we ask.

I liked your response.
31,679 posted on 03/04/2002 12:03:22 PM PST by NATE4"ONE NATION"
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31612 | View Replies]

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to:
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

Send PayPal direct to JimRob@psnw.com

31,680 posted on 03/04/2002 12:03:27 PM PST by theophilusscribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31677 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 31,641-31,66031,661-31,68031,681-31,700 ... 37,681-37,689 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson