Posted on 10/15/2001 6:54:40 AM PDT by malakhi
Statesmen may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue. - John Adams |
II Timothy 1:6 Wherefore I put thee in remembrance that thou stir up the gift of God, which is in thee by the putting on of my hands.
Steven, you are still missing the point. That being that the gift was bestowed by the laying on of hands. It is not a gift that was already there being stirred by the laying on of hands. No, it is a gift given by the laying on of hands. Examine the sentence slowly.
I put thee in rembrance - I am reminding you
that thou stir up the gift of God - to stir up the gift of God
which is in thee - the gift of God is inside you
by the putting on of my hands - the gift of God which is inside you because of my laying on of hands.
SD
What point am I missing? I agree that Paul is reminding Timothy to stir up the gift inside of him by the laying on of his hands? The gift in this scripture isn't the office of a bishop. The gift could be the characteristic that makes him a good bishop.
Are you pulling our leg? You can't really be that dense, can you? Get this: Strong's is not a dictionary. It wasn't written as one and it does not serve as one.
Is that clear? What Strong's does is tell you what the words used in the NT mean, in context. These words also have multiple meanings, often related. That is, a word can mean different things depending on context. To not recognize this fact is to be deliberately obtuse. We could provide many many examples of the same phenomenon in English or any other language.
Just because "Jesus said it" or the NT uses one particular definition of a word does not negate the existence of others. You are in grave danger of displaying the worship of the sacred text that we Catholics always accuse you of.
Do words have objective meanings or Humpty Dumpty meanings to you? If words have no objective meanings, then why do you argue with the meaning of the word "Theotokos" as "God of Usury". If meaning rests with the reader, then is it not the right of the reader to make up his meaning. You do it all the time.
The meaning rests with the people who originated the word. And that had to do with the controversies over the nature of Christ and had little to do with interest.
Do you understand at all that tokos can mean both childbirth/childbearing and interest on money? Do you understand at all why these would be served by the same word? Do you understand at all how language develops and evolves, how old words are forced into new meanings as situations change?
Have you ever heard of an "interest bearing" account? Does that ring a bell?
SD
Have you conceded that the gift was given through the laying on of hands?
SD
Good readings and meditation today ... I think we can all enjoy this one.
Please keep my wife, Dianne, and our soon-to-be-born child in your prayers tonight and through the day tomorrow. Specifically, for a healthy baby, a healthy wife, and that the induction procedure will go as planned and that she won't spend 11 hours in labor like last time. Ouch! :o(
Tuesday, February 5, 2002 St. Agatha, Virgin, Martyr (Memorial) |
||
|
Imagine what might have gone on in the mind of the synagogue leader Jairus before he came to Jesus for help. Maybe he had struggled with thoughts like, "A man of my position can't go begging to a carpenter-turned-preacher!" And what about the hemorrhaging woman? After twelve years of sickness, what hopeless thoughts and fears did she have to overcome before pressing through the crowd and reaching out to touch Jesus' cloak?
Whatever their challenges, both Jairus and the hemorrhaging woman chose to trust Jesus by taking a bold step of faith. Because they believed in what they had not yet seen, both of them received the reward they had sought: Jairus saw his daughter raised back to life, and the woman was instantly healed and sent away with a blessing from the Son of God!
This man and woman give us two powerful examples of the kind of faith that Jesus calls each of us to develop. Haven't we all been in situations before where we were reluctant or afraid to take action because it meant taking a risk? Maybe we weren't ready to step out of our comfort zones. Maybe we worried what other people might think about us. Maybe we were afraid we might fail. What about offering to pray for healing with a sick neighbor? Would we do it if we thought that Jesus was inviting us to? He has been known to put these inspirations into people's hearts sometimes! And when we do step out and take a risk, we often find that people receive this outpouring of love gladly, if a bit nervously. Even better, we might find that God touches them through our prayer and the witness of our calm trust in Jesus.
Today, let Jesus know that you will be looking out for any inspirations he wants to give you. Tell him you want to overcome your fears and hesitations and act on them. Ask him for the grace to step out in faith as he directs. Just knock and the door will be opened--a door that leads to deeper faith and intimacy with Jesus for you and to untold blessings for others.
"Jesus, please speak to my heart today. Give me ears to hear you and recognize your direction. Help me to grow in active, confident, risk-taking faith. I trust in your goodness and mercy."
----------
Have a great day, everybody!
AC
Yes I concede that the gift inside of him was given by the laying on of hands. I contend the gift inside of him is something he possesses that makes him an effective Pastor, bishop, whatever.
If you had coined the word yesterday, you could impart whatever meaning you would like to it. Seeing as how it is a word that has aready had a meaning associated with it for well near two millennia, it is quite silly to think you can redefine it now.
Maybe we should talk about basketball instead. Except when I say "basketball" I mean the sport played by white men chasing a black disc using sticks on an icy surface.
"Theotokos" means literally "God of usury, or God of interest on money loaned" or by extension "God of moneylenders or moneychangers" -- and which one of those three meanings a person chooses depends on the context?
Yeah, either that or the established definition, "bearer of God."
Thank you for your philosophy. .
Havoc? Is that you?
SD
OK, my mistake. I thought you were contesting that. I guess we are back to simply disagreeing about wheter the giving of the gift is also a bestowing of a role or office in the Church.
SD
"Tocology The science of childbirth, is one of the words in this theme. Tokos, the root of the word, is Greek for childbirth but obstetrics is commonly used instead."
Bet all those OB/GYN doctors out there will be shocked to find that they have been moneylenders all along.
Let's set aside for the moment whether Paul is referring to an ordination or to something else. Paul is not laying his hands on Timothy in this letter. He is speaking of an event that has already happened - that's the imparting of the gift through the laying on of hands. Paul is exhorting Timothy to stir up that gift.
My point is that the clear meaning of this verse is that the gift was imparted through the laying on of hands. Whether the gift was Holy Orders or something else, the impartation of a spiritual gift (grace) through an outward sign (laying on of hands) is scriptural.
Thanks, BigMack. I hope you don't mind another question or two! If I can make my earlier question a little more specific... When you pray, to whom do you direct your prayer? Do you just 'talk with God'? And when you do so, do you simply have faith that He hears you, or do you (on occasion) experience God's Presence?
Gee. I thought that was my point. All except for the Holy Orders.
That is one interpretation. I don't agree with it. I believe that the laying on of hands that Paul is talking to Timothy about was his ordination. I believe that the laying on of hands in Acts is a description of what we now call Confirmation, which is the sacrament in which a baptized person who had been properly instructed in the Faith, receives the seven fold gifts of the Holy Spirit.
Oh, and Dave. Havoc has been playing pretty nice lately. We need to cut him some slack. Woodkirk seems to be in a "class" by himself (though perhaps "class" is not the right word - I'll go check Strong's).
I'm sorry. I didn't understand that from your earlier posts.
I suppose. Even Havoc isn't going to try to redefine a well known word, so this guy is in a whole different class. I just thought the parting shot about "philosophy" was very, what's the word?, Havocian.
SD
Only words that ever run through my mind when Christianity is mentioned.
Will do, al! May God bless you and your family.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.