Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bin Laden 'will be betrayed'
The Guardian ^ | 10/11/01 | Staff and agencies

Posted on 10/11/2001 3:49:36 PM PDT by veronica

Bin Laden 'will be betrayed'

Staff and agencies

Thursday October 11, 2001

Osama bin Laden will probably be betrayed by an Afghan who will lead allied forces to the world's most wanted man, the Ministry of Defence claimed today. Sir Michael Boyce, Britain's chief of defence, said the current aerial bombardment would probably "flush out" Bin Laden - and if that failed someone would inform on him.

He also predicted that the offensive would last through the winter and well into next year.

He said: "What you can do is make support for that man so difficult that eventually someone will give him up. "I think the pressure we are putting on the country will flush him out and he will be flushed out by an Afghan person who doesn't support him, probably, in the first instance, and when he finds him he will tell us and we will do something about it."

As American warplanes continued daylight raids over Afghanistan, Sir Michael brought reporters in London up to date on the progress of the war. "We must expect to go through the winter and into next summer at the very least," he said.

"I certainly see the tempo fluctuating. I think it is certainly possible there will be a slowdown in the near future while we take stock." He indicated that if coalition ground troops were sent into Afghanistan, they would be likely to include the Royal Marines 3 Commando Brigade, currently taking part in exercises in Oman.

"They are our expert mountain and winter warfare troops," he said. "If we were to be thinking about doing any operations in Afghanistan on the ground, then clearly they would be one of the units we would give very close consideration to."

He made it clear that any deployment of ground troops would probably only be for a short period with very clearly defined objectives. "There needs to be a very clear reason for going in. It is not a country, as history has told us, for us to linger in, other than to go in for a very specific task and then withdraw again," he said.

Sir Michael said that the air strikes were having a "huge psychological effect" on the Taliban amid signs that the regime was beginning to fracture under the pressure.

"The Taliban leadership may make defiant statements, but the Talibs on the ground can see which way the wind is blowing," he said.

"They should be getting the message about our determination to root out al-Qaida. They have seen not just the coalition's military power but its resolve."

More than 40 targets inside Afghanistan have been hit during the raids and Sir Michael said that while the results of the battle damage assessment had been "encouraging", more needed to be done.

Afghan refugees who fled into neighbouring Pakistan said that the airport at Kandahar, where at least 300 Bin Laden followers used to live, and a terrorist training camp at nearby Maiwan were both hit in last night's raids.

US warplanes used 5,000lb "bunker buster" bombs, designed to penetrate reinforced strongholds, for the first time in a shift of tactics designed to clear the way for possible commando raids or the deployment of ground forces.

The Taliban claimed that more than 100 people died in last night's air raids in the heaviest bombardment so far by forces involved in Operation Enduring Freedom.

The Taliban ambassador to Pakistan, Abdul Salam Zaeef, said that they included 15 civilians "martyred" outside a mosque when US warplanes attacked the city of Jalalabad.

"The number is increasing with the passage of time. The pentagon is lying to the world when it says it is not hitting civilians," he said.

The defence secretary, Geoff Hoon, said that the claims - which had not been independently verified - would be thoroughly investigated. He said that every effort was made to "minimise" civilian casualties.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: veronica
Actually, bin Laden went to a fortune teller and asked what day he would die. The fortune teller told him he would die on an American holiday. He asked which one.

"Oh, that doesn't matter. The day YOU die is going to BECOME an American holiday!"

21 posted on 10/11/2001 7:01:48 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Usama bin Clinton was reported hiding in hardened underground bunkers, his sacred buttocks lip moistened and protected by his elite media bodyguards, including Mohammed Rivera and Mustafa Gumbal.

But who, oh who will be the betrayer?

22 posted on 10/11/2001 7:02:54 PM PDT by TheGoodDoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
,,, he could have some pigs' ears substituted for his own too. He could phone his momma again and say "something big has just happened; it may be a while before you hear from me again."
23 posted on 10/11/2001 7:09:37 PM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: WarrenC
The operative phrase is "recent days." They lost 2 million out of a prewar population of 17 million - over 10 percent. Another 10 million became refugees either internally or externally. There's been no attempt to give them anything positive to look forward to, other than if they get rid of Bin Ladin the bombing may - or may not - top.

I may as well point out the Soviets had bounties on the heads of various field commanders during their 10 years in the country, and none of the major ones ever got captured.

26 posted on 10/11/2001 10:30:43 PM PDT by AGAviator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
Consider the difference

It's not me you need to be persuading.

27 posted on 10/11/2001 10:32:43 PM PDT by AGAviator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik
If we do get him alive, he needs to fall down a long flight of stairs.

LOL! All the way to H.......!!

28 posted on 10/11/2001 10:36:31 PM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TKEman
would obl consider setting off a nuke in afghanistan just to blame the Americans?
29 posted on 10/11/2001 10:37:09 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
Would we set one off and blame it on him?
30 posted on 10/11/2001 11:02:02 PM PDT by paul51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: AGAviator
There's been no attempt to give them anything positive to look forward to, other than if they get rid of Bin Ladin the bombing may - or may not - top.

I think you need to consider that the Taliban are not exactly the popular guys on the block in Afghanistan. While many non-afghans and some nationals support the Taliban, I believe most Afghans really do look forward to a Taliban free Afghan.

I agree that tribal forces will unite to fight a common foe, but at this moment most of the tribal forces do not view America as the enemy, but rather a liberator.

That of course could change in a heartbeat for about a hundred reasons.

31 posted on 10/12/2001 2:37:29 AM PDT by Fzob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
I don't know. I think if he had a nuke, then he'd use it on the west.
32 posted on 10/12/2001 5:02:02 AM PDT by TKEman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Fzob
At this moment most of the tribal forces do not view America as the enemy, but rather a liberator

Since I happen to know people who have contacts with said "tribal forces," I have to tell you that you are wrong.

That of course could change in a heartbeat for about a hundred reasons

It has changed. Count on it.

33 posted on 10/12/2001 9:19:00 AM PDT by AGAviator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: AGAviator
It has changed. Count on it.

Why?

34 posted on 10/12/2001 9:29:50 AM PDT by Fzob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: AGAviator
It has changed. Count on it.

Why?

35 posted on 10/12/2001 9:31:20 AM PDT by Fzob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: AGAviator
History also teaches

We need to give bin Laden a very undignified death, maybe like Hitler's suicide. Stuff pork in his mouth before he dies so they know he's never going to see allah and cannot be a martyr. Just like the Nazis began to deny they ever were one, they too can disown bin Laden.

36 posted on 10/12/2001 9:43:02 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik
Nah, forget the stairs!!

I say we fence off central Park in New York, then the police when they are bringing him to trial can say that he made a daring escape into Central Park. The Police then say that they are not even gonna try and find him, and then leave. Let the people of New York deal with him, face to face, man to man so to speak. They would tear him to pieces, there wouldn't be enough left to feed pigs with.

I think that since he hurt New York so badly, we allow New York to take care of him and his minions. Shoot, let them all escape into Central Park and allow 25000 citizens, chosen by lottery go in and tear them into pieces... Yeah, barbaric, but never knew a guy who deserved it more!!
37 posted on 10/12/2001 10:15:44 AM PDT by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

To: Fzob
Why?

We're coming in bombing, without any attempt to get local support before doing it. There is "collateral damage," and there will continue to be.

40 posted on 10/12/2001 1:27:15 PM PDT by AGAviator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson